NotTheGuyYouKill
Member
Does this have any RPG elements? Or is it a pure shooter?
The purest shooter.
Does this have any RPG elements? Or is it a pure shooter?
Why Max runs slow or when he enters in that crib and kills those 3 gangsters is moving slow when using aim. The MP2 had nice walking/runing, I remember the hospital in Chapter III. Well, I think this happens because is a totally different engine and I have to get used with it.
Cover system is less important to me. I hope their are not turning the game into a cover by cover to every corner; Splinter Cell 5 thing because always both games gave me that adrenaline rush of going directly into the enemies like a train with bullet time activated.
Looking great. I dont care about story, acting, levelling, conversation trees, exploring or whatever.
I just want to shoot people in the face.
My only choice? If I shoot them in the face in slowmo or not.
Thanks. All I need to do now is quote this every time someone claims fans like you don't exist, and franchises aren't ruined to appeal to such types.
i want it right now. amazing
glad they ditched the old comic book panel style.
I enjoyed the comic book panels in previous games, but i mean, would they really work now? If they did, Alan Wake would of used them.
The game looks fucking great by the way. Rockstar.....holy crap I love em!!
Thanks. All I need to do now is quote this every time someone claims fans like you don't exist, and franchises aren't ruined to appeal to such types.
...just watched it
FUCK
Rockstar just made the best shooter of the decade
my god
You're confusing what he likes about the game with what Rockstar chose to put into it. MP3 has several of the things he said he wasn't interested in. And the rest aren't Max Payne hallmarks to begin with.
Maybe I'm not understanding you correctly.
I think it just might be. Third person shooters are my favourite genre... and the king has returned.
I just loathe anyone that plays Max Payne for shooting only and ignores everything else. Max Payne 1/2 are the best shooters of all time but I have issue calling them shooters because I find them to be much more than that.
As for this game itself. I think everything looks good except:
1. Atrocious, terrible, horrible, awful, ridiculous setting/atmosphere. (Deal breaker for me personally since when it comes to Max Payne/Alan Wake/Remedy games etc. I care more about atmosphere and story than gameplay) Remedy not handling this game means it isn't canon and is a spinoff.
2. The weird drunk look in the cutscenes, people seem to double up and it looks dizzying for some reason, looks bad.
3. Stupid cover.
Everything else looks good but I couldn't care less about another good shooter. Plenty of those exist. I wanted Max Payne 3 and this is not it (for me) because of the setting alone. It doesn't reflect what I care about in the series.
I just loathe anyone that plays Max Payne for shooting only and ignores everything else. Max Payne 1/2 are the best shooters of all time but I have issue calling them shooters because I find them to be much more than that.
The primary mechanic of Max Payne 1 and 2 was always... shooting. That's why it's a shooter. It's a brilliant, narrative-driven shooter, but it's still a shooter. It's genre-defining and a great step towards good narrative in games.
But you still jump in the air and shoot a lot of people in awesome ways.
I just loathe anyone that plays Max Payne for shooting only and ignores everything else. Max Payne 1/2 are the best shooters of all time but I have issue calling them shooters because I find them to be much more than that.
As for this game itself. I think everything looks good except:
1. Atrocious, terrible, horrible, awful, ridiculous setting/atmosphere. (Deal breaker for me personally since when it comes to Max Payne/Alan Wake/Remedy games etc. I care more about atmosphere and story than gameplay) Remedy not handling this game means it isn't canon and is a spinoff.
2. The weird drunk look in the cutscenes, people seem to double up and it looks dizzying for some reason, looks bad.
3. Stupid cover.
Everything else looks good but I couldn't care less about another good shooter. Plenty of those exist. I wanted Max Payne 3 and this is not it (for me) because of the setting alone. It doesn't reflect what I care about in the series.
I just loathe anyone that plays Max Payne for shooting only and ignores everything else. Max Payne 1/2 are the best shooters of all time but I have issue calling them shooters because I find them to be much more than that.
As for this game itself. I think everything looks good except:
1. Atrocious, terrible, horrible, awful, ridiculous setting/atmosphere. (Deal breaker for me personally since when it comes to Max Payne/Alan Wake/Remedy games etc. I care more about atmosphere and story than gameplay) Remedy not handling this game means it isn't canon and is a spinoff.
2. The weird drunk look in the cutscenes, people seem to double up and it looks dizzying for some reason, looks bad.
3. Stupid cover.
Everything else looks good but I couldn't care less about another good shooter. Plenty of those exist. I wanted Max Payne 3 and this is not it (for me) because of the setting alone. It doesn't reflect what I care about in the series.
Honestly for me the shooting is just something I go through to continue the narrative. I see Max Payne 1/2 as 8 hour movies and the gameplay is just there. I don't dislike it, it's fun but the 3rd or 4th reason why I play them. The top ones would be atmosphere, setting, dialogue, characters etc.
So when I see someone say none of that matters and this game looks awesome because 'xxxxxplosionnn super cool SET PIECE WHOA motorcycle jump slow mo zack snyder MAN ROCKSTAR DOES IT AGAIN LOLOLOL' I get infuriated.
Honestly for me the shooting is just something I go through to continue the narrative. I see Max Payne 1/2 as 8 hour movies and the gameplay is just there. I don't dislike it, it's fun but the 3rd or 4th reason why I play them. The top ones would be atmosphere, setting, dialogue, characters etc.
So when I see someone say none of that matters and this game looks awesome because 'xxxxxplosionnn super cool SET PIECE WHOA motorcycle jump slow mo zack snyder MAN ROCKSTAR DOES IT AGAIN LOLOLOL' I get infuriated.
Man, you come off as so elitist sometimes.
"Bah, you play this game for the ability to shoot your enemy? How positively proletariat. You don't truly appreciate the craftsmanship of the tale told, you degenerate."
Sometimes the same game will appeal to different people for different reasons.
last sec. of the gif: can you aim backwards and shoot? or is it ammo depleted animation?
last sec. of the gif: can you aim backwards and shoot? or is it ammo depleted animation?
Gameplay looks awesome, but the random subtitles appearing during cutscenes looks too cheesy. Not as bad as Splinter Cell Conviction.. I couldnt stand that game's presentation.
SO SO SO SO SO GOOD
Conviction's way of doing it looked better to me.
No I'll bet that is just the trailer.I thought the on screen text was just something done for the trailer, not something that was part of the scene. Huh. I don't hate it, but don't love it.
I hope so..No I'll bet that is just the trailer.
The RGB splits and digital effects look pretty bad overall. I'll probably just do post-process off and never look back. It's a shame because the rest of the visuals look great.
Yeah, here the choice of font is atrocious and it sticks out like a sore thumb. Splinter Cell's actually mesh well with the visuals.
Ahhhh.....so good!!
I don't remember being offended by the subtitles for non-English used in Man on Fire. They fit the style.I think it's interesting, but I can see why people won't like it. It's pretty much ripping off Tony Scott.