I still can't believe some people really believed that the game was cancelled or was never going to be released -_-"
Sometimes information can get lost in the grape vine, so to say. It's not uncommon to get information that doesn't turn out to be true or is only partially true depending on the source.
You guys need to get over yourselves.
Do people never post rumours on GAF?
Do people not love discussing the rumours that Kotaku posts?
Do people not appreciate that they actually got some fucking news out of Wada on the subject?
Your behaviour is pathetic... ban Kotaku? Ban yourselves for talking about it, then.
Sure, but they are in the business for a couple of years now ? I assume they would have developed some mechanism to source for alternate views ? (e.g., Why not ask you if other Gaffers seem to "know" and trust you with FF info for some time now).
I'm just saying they are taking the easy way out and "retweet" what others report. If they do a little more leg work, their report could be very different, and work to their advantage.
They would still get more traffic and yet gain better reputation.
All depends on who you know I suppose. And what you decide to share.
OK now that this rumor has been clarified, what are the chances of seeing something new about the game at TGS?
Yes, and if they approached you with the other rumor, you would have said you heard otherwise right ? Just like you posted the same note here. It is indeed up to Kotaku how they want to approach the rumor, and how they want to build their business. They are not being smart. They can earn $$$ and trust at the same time.
I think everyone should thank Kotaku, otherwise we wouldn't have an statement on the development. *runs*
Typically it's better if you try and get multiple sources, on possible different sides of the matter, yes.
OK now that this rumor has been clarified, what are the chances of seeing something new about the game at TGS?
pretty big fail if they don't even show it at the FF25th thing before TGS
I wouldn't be upset if they didn't if that meant Versus got to have TGS.
Why the hell not? A rumor is a rumor. Websites like that would suck if they never posted them. There's always a chance they will be wrong, and if you can't handle that you shouldn't be reading rumor articles.
Also I find it offensive that you think you're some kind of authority on what can and can't be posted on a blog.
They heard it from multiple sources. They also contacted Square Enix who didn't clarify if it was still in development or not. The games been MIA for years. They didn't make anything up and had justification for reporting on it.
To me it's a matter of credibility. Guy claimed to have sources and he was willing to post it. So he's either an idiot for believing that source or he's making stuff up. Makes the site look really bad in my books.
If I can draw an analogy to sports there's solid rumour posting and there's garbage rumour posting. Insiders that report rumours that are not yet confirmed but turn out to be true in a few days are the ones who deserve your respect. To me, those are the only types of rumours that should be posted if you consider yourself to be a credible site.
We all knew that was the case. Kotaku simply wanted free clicks like usual...
Why the hell not? Uh, because reporting bullshit should logically lower someone's credibility? That's how journalism works.
If it's a rumor it may or may not be true. If it's clearly labeled as a rumor and ends up not being true it's not Kotaku's fault you're upset.
:/Kotaku operates on the same principle as supermarket checkout line magazines. The more lurid the headline, the better.
69 ways to please your PS3
Perhaps. But if they publish "too many" low quality rumors, their brand will devalue. Reading Gaf, it seems to indicate that they are already there.
80%. For 4 reasons:
1. It's about time
2. Wada said he's been going to regular meetings, which shows that they are working hard on the game.
3. What's a better time to show off than TGS?
4. Rumours of TGS appearance.
video for the event
playable demo for tgs
Big sites usually don't report such big rumours unless they are quite sure about it. What this shows is that Kotaku's sources are untrustworthy which lowers their credibility a lot. You can't just put rumour in a title and post things that turns out to be false repeatedly.If it's a rumor it may or may not be true. If it's clearly labeled as a rumor and ends up not being true it's not Kotaku's fault you're upset.
Or maybe people just need to learn what the word "rumor" means.
This would be even better, but of what event are you talking about?
Lol as if there was any doubt.
Now let's see if IGN put as much effort in to telling people the game is not cancelled. They went all out in informing the world the game was pretty much dead.
Game must be played sitting down, confirmed.
Game must be played sitting down, confirmed.
If it's a rumor it may or may not be true. If it's clearly labeled as a rumor and ends up not being true it's not Kotaku's fault you're upset.
Game must be played sitting down, confirmed.
They already know what "rumors" mean. The problem is the rumors become "lies" if they are proven false.
Oh that one, I already knew about this event but I wasn't considering it because it seems to be more about the "Lightning Saga" part of FF XIII (XIII-2 and possibly XIII-3).
It would be odd to have a Versus XII trailer there if that's the case, but who knows maybe they'll show something there.
Can we ban Kotaku yet?
I would welcome this..So, Kotaku is banned on GAF now or what?
Kotaku always listed it as a rumor though. It was IGN that listed it as a fact and report.
Wada says something that makes me like him?
It was a big problem in FFXIII because you just keep going from one corridor to another, but no one really complained about that in FFXIII-2 due to plenty of other distractions.Serious question why does gaf have such a hard on for hd towns although you barely spend any time in them in any ff game? Not counting "bases"