It's insane to think of how poorly this machine is doing, yet all the potentially fantastic Nintendo games we could get out of it.
For anyone saying they should cancel the Wii U and create something new(and stronger), how do you suppose they do that?
At the very earliest, the new console would launch in Q4 2015 probably. Do they push all of the Wii U games they have in development back to launch with the new machine, or do they continue releasing them on their dead console in the meantime?
Which is nonsense since most of those games also launched on other platforms. It's called competition. Most of those game probably didn't sell that much, but you'd expect the four best selling games of 2012 (AC3, CoD, Fifa, Madden) to become bestsellers on the Wii U too. Never happened.
Also, I read the OP and the article linked up and down, but couldn't find any direct quotes from Guillemot. Does anyone have them?
The quotes in the thread title are filtered through the voice of the article author, I'd like to know what Guillemot said himself.
I studied journalism in college, and there's a rule that says that everytime you paraphrase something, you put the corresponding quote afterwards to back it up. you can see that they use that rule with the Activision and EA guys, but in the case of Ubisoft, there isn't a real quote, just the paraphrasis of the journalist. The only Ubisoft quote there is the one that it says that they are gonna wait for the holidays to evaluate the situation. There's nothing there about ZombiU or Rayman, except the journalist assumptions.
I'm not saying he's lying or something, but I find it pretty weird that he has direct quotes from the other two guys, and not the Ubisoft guy.
the wii u is just going to be nintendo and platinum games eh?
Well, who would buy a console with such poor third-party support?
Especially with this lineup for the fall
Rayman
Watch Dogs
Splinter Cell
Assassin's Creed
I hate to say it, but Ubisoft for some people has a better lineup for Wii U than Nintendo.
If Nintendo's games flop this holiday (doubtful) than they have no choice but to pretty much VB Wii U. However if they bring in a nice profit like Gamecube Nintendo software and the hardware continues to fail they just focus more 3DS to make profits while waiting out this gen and building their teams and a strong arsenal of 3rd party partners for next gen launches. I hoped that with the death of the mid level game Nintendo could have a big chance to do something in that space, but I guess not this gen. There will definitely be some developers like Media Molecule floating around this gen and Nintendo has to be more aggressive in seeking out talent and fostering it and not just on their own IP.
As for what Nintendo should have done 6 months ago was create 2-3 "porting" studios (much like what MS created for their Minecraft version)
I think it's wrong for mr Moore to say all these things. He promised to back Nintendo and he didn't. No wonder no one is online.
The console needs games mister Moore.
Why? All four of those launched later on Wii U.
People who like Nintendo games. As is the trademarked answer.
Hopefully this will put to rest the idea that if third parties only tried, they'd find magical success on Nintendo platforms. Some of them tried on Wii; they mostly failed. Some of them tried on Wii U; they failed.
The ecosystem for the games Nintendo offers seems to simply be out of sync for the greater industry at large and for many consumers... and it's clear now that while the Wii seemed like a good idea at the time, it had unintended consequences. Like how Nintendo wasn't prepared for the HD generation still, and now let the system languish for a year. Or how the previous HD gen was making everyone exhausted of it after eight years, and now Wii U is just entering into that realm technologically and everyone has already moved on.
And now the third party situation just gets worse... we're looking at a system that might end up after the first year to have the worst third party situation yet for Nintendo.
It's tough. Beyond tough.
They're not going to flop, at least not in the traditional sense, but are they going to be relegated to 700-900k sales figures? NSMB is easily one of Nintendo's biggest franchises ever, and as you can see it didn't push the Wii U to any unprecedented heights. Will 3D Mario - which have sold considerably worse than 2D Mario - another Mario Kart and their other fall games really be enough to change this situation in any appreciable way?
It's no surprise after Nintendo chose a mini-game collection and a Wii-enhanced game (which looks like a DS game) as their flagship titles at a price tag of 350$.
Too bad about ZombiU sales, it was by far, the best WiiU offering at launch.
That is the whole problem with the article. It has no credibility whatsoever without a direct quote. And there is none.
Also, I read the OP and the article linked up and down, but couldn't find any direct quotes from Guillemot. Does anyone have them?
The quotes in the thread title are filtered through the voice of the article author, I'd like to know what Guillemot said himself.
MS didn't create a porting studio for Minecraft. They hired 4J Studios, an independent studio that worked on a dozen previous titles, original and ports, to work on it.
I think it's wrong for mr Moore to say all these things. He promised to back Nintendo and he didn't. No wonder no one is online.
The console needs games mister Moore.
I don't understand why Nintendo isn't pissed at these guy's (yeah I know they need them to make games, but then again, I would have been pised)
If the situation goes on and on like this, you can already know what's going to be next Nintendo's home console: a device that receives signal from the next gen handheld and outputs it on TV, in order to play games on the big screen, using the portable console (and its screens) as a controller. A Wii U reversed. Handheld and device sold separately at launch, then starting being bundled one year after launch.
The hardest problem is that it's a catch 22. For Nintendo to cultivate that audience on their platforms they need to have a good amount of 3rd party support to get people interested, but 3rd parties aren't going to invest in such an unstable ecosystem. So does Nintendo have to pay for every single port then? It's become a cycle at this point that seems very hard to break
I wonder when third parties will consider Wii U completely dead. Watchdogs sales will be interesting to see.
They're not going to flop, at least not in the traditional sense, but are they going to be relegated to 700-900k sales figures? NSMB is easily one of Nintendo's biggest franchises ever, and as you can see it didn't push the Wii U to any unprecedented heights. Will 3D Mario - which have sold considerably worse than 2D Mario - another Mario Kart and their other fall games really be enough to change this situation in any appreciable way?
It's such a nonsense argument. Do you expect me believe that all Wii U owners also have a PS3 and/or 360 at home and will therefore have skipped the biggest holiday titles of 2012 for the Wii U?
Yes, it may be true of a subsection of the Nintendo fans who picked up a Wii U during the holidays, but I suspect most of those Wii U buyers are either hardcore Nintendo fans or families buying a Christmas present. And for most of those Wii U buyers Fifa, Madden, AC3 and Call of Duty:BO2 would have been brand new titles. The reason those titles didn't sell was not because they were late, but because Nintendo fans only buy Nintendo games for a Nintendo console.
If Wii U is profitable in the end, Nintendo will make another console. Until that profit runs dry they won't consolidate.
Edit: The bad port argument really needs to go away as if everyone who bought a wii u is the most discerning customer. Shit games and bad ports sell well all the time. Hell you can look back at the wii for all the shovelwhare that did great
Why would anyone be mad at Mr. Moore or EA? They use Madden as an example. I'm guessing Madden on the Wii-U wasn't the best port to begin with? .
metalslimer said:John Harker said Ubisoft is watching Splinter Cell very closely.
I wonder when third parties will consider Wii U completely dead. Watchdogs sales will be interesting to see.
I wonder when third parties will consider Wii U completely dead. Watchdogs sales will be interesting to see.
There are no insults here? It's just him saying its not profitableUgh.. these are one if the reasons why I have a love hate relationship with Ubisoft. One minute, they defend the crap out of a system, the next day, they talk hella crap. Why? Just super why? Seriously.
On the other hand, Nintendo needs to grow up. I'll say this... I'm tired of Nintendo fans always defending Nintendo bad business choices. Sure, they have been the most innovative out the two but innovation is nothing when the output becomes useless. Everyone could go on talking about how everyone copies Nintendo but in some ways, regardless of copying, they always do so well without it.. I'm tired of the Nintendoom articles but come on... this is tiresome to hear the same issues all the time with every Nintendo system.
I think its now, they've got the PS4 and Xbone to graduate to, and they see even more detailed NPD stuff than we do of course.
They're locked into their second wave and cross-gen stuff for this holiday, but I don't think anyone expects miracles. As such, even if the WiiU became the hard plastic box equivalent of cocaine overnight, there'll be a 2 year lull between support due to no-one okaying new projects for it right now or since earlier this year and by that point WiiU will be at the end of its short and disastrous 4-5 year lifespan.
GI.biz isn't going to slander their interviewee to that extent, so the information presented is straight from the horses mouth. The article is presented as an article and not the Q+A form where we hear the interviewers questions, but the facts remain regardless what was asked:
- ZombiU was not profitable (Not even close)
- No plans (or even desire) for a sequel.
- Because of [ZombiU's] performance, Ubisoft decided to make Rayman Legends a multiplatform game
If you need to hear if the interviewer's end where he asked "was ZombiU profitable?" or "is this why you put Rayman Legends on other systems?" then you're both grasping at straws to invalidate bad news you don't want to hear.
Er you do realize this is 2013 and 3 years would be 2015 not 2014? If they wait til 2016 they will probably end up launching a new handheld and console in the same 12 month period which will kill them development wise. The best thing for Nintendo if they plan on having handheld/console be separate is to have at least a 2 year spread to get things ready and not have huge launch droughts
It was more or less Madden 12 with new rosters, and without any of the new physics features/engine. Without the spectacle of improved graphics to make people forget their buying an inferior product. Full price.
If Wii U is profitable in the end, Nintendo will make another console. Until that profit runs dry they won't consolidate.
UBI's said that after this holiday they're going to re-evaluate the console. So, Nintendo's looking at a very critical period over the next few months. That price drop needs to happen and they need to hope that their upcoming lineup catches on like they think it will.
Mario Kart comes out next year
So?
As for the handheld: they have no competition right now in the handheld space. They don't need to release a handheld right away. They could conceivably let the 3DS have a 10-year lifespan if they keep putting out software.
I'm not saying he didn't say those things. But I do want to know exactly what and how he said them, because that's important too. And if it were "straight from the horses mouth" as you put it, there would be a direct quote (just as I directly quoted you there).
And who said anything about invalidating anything, pretty aggressive there, sport. I don't think wanting to see exactly what he said, versus the informal lens of the article author, is anything out of left field.
You got the math wrong and said no way Nintendo would put out a new console in 2014 when the person you were respoding to never said 2014 but 2015. And Nintendo will kill their handheld business sitting on the 3DS for 10 years. That kind of complacency is what kills consoles. The mobile market would eat it alive at that point unless they were selling it for like 49.99. Even the DS couldn't last for 10 years if Nintendo wanted it to. The max you will see for 3DS is DS lifespan of 6 years, but I'm more betting on 5 so a 2016 launch.
Really!? Oh Christ they could have used that...
the wii u is just going to be nintendo and platinum games eh?
I'm not saying he didn't say those things. But I do want to know exactly what and how he said them, because that's important too. And if it were "straight from the horses mouth" as you put it, there would be a direct quote (just as I directly quoted you there).
And who said anything about invalidating anything, pretty aggressive there, sport. I don't think wanting to see exactly what he said, versus the informal lens of the article author, is anything out of left field.
Really!? Oh Christ they could have used that...
Wii U - Gamecube 0.5!
Wii U - Gamecube 0.5!