John Kowalski
Banned
I like how much GAF is hated by those Youtube commenters. To be hated by youtube commenters = huge compliment, really.
they never mention me =(
I like how much GAF is hated by those Youtube commenters. To be hated by youtube commenters = huge compliment, really.
they never mention me =(
Doesn't PewDiePie disable them now? YouTube is just a cesspool. Also you run the risk of TotalBiscuit appearing like Candyman to "actually..." you to death.
1. anita made a super entry level feminism 101 video criticizing portrayal of women in videogames (not necessarily a bad thing, entry level doesn't mean bad)
2. people take what would be a regular, everyday internet post about women in * form of media as a personal insult because it's videogames, not movies and videogames are the last bastion of masculinity in a world where emasculated sissy boys are the status quo and the real he-man is an endangered species
3. escalation, trolls on all sides, people from various websites intentionally spreading misinformation about these angry people and about anita/etc basically siphoning a bunch of really gullible/stupid/willfully ignorant people into believing falsehoods through sheer volume and repetition
4. groups of people who would normally never give a shit about internet feminists making a youtube video see an opportunity for profit and viewers, even more groups of people who see an opportunity to make a shitload of people mad join in, various fractured corners of the internet such as supposed MRAs, republicans, libertarians, conspiracy theorists etc etc join under the banner of #gamergate because this whole thing is a catalyst that proves women are trying to cut everyone's balls off and turn the world into a hellish postapocalyptic matriarchy where everyone must be fed feelings pills and kick dirt at the new 'male subhuman'.
Did I miss anything? I don't really follow this shit much anymore, but I was there for its inception
And your slippery slope argument has no legitimate basis. It is by its nature and foundation a fallacy, and in the way you're using it, it's a cowardly, selfish and immature argument that's more worried about 'muh AAA games' than anything socially important.
though even prior to the harassement issue she wasnt very open to online discussions anyway....
Dug one up. Scroll down past the statistics for a whole load of what the academia is doing regarding sociology and gaming. You'll find more if you check out some of Lime's other posts, check out the journals those papers are published in or look into what the authors have published as well.
So:
1. Businesses design and market product for a variety of target audiences.
2. Somebody gets offended when a group of products have a design that they don't like
3. Group takes donations to publicly say "Fuck You" to an entire industry
4. Group successfully picks a public fight with an industry
5. Group acts surprised when consumers and figures in and around industry say "Fuck You" and lash back
6. Group reacts by literally saying "Fuck You"
7. Group acts like a victim in a fight they started in public
Am I accurate? close? 50/50? way off?
When there's criticism of something isn't the natural reaction to do something that reduces said criticism?
Also, isn't calling the poster cowardly and selfish a little harsh and unnecessary?
Youtube comments turned out like the Deep Internet. You have to dig deep to find any decent discussion, plus I always avoid starting a debate there.
But I mean even if you exclude YT videos, she avoided online discussions even with people that supported her or wanted to discuss in a civil manner. Nowadays that is the right thing for her of course.
I still hope to god that at least some of the people left don't necessarily believe what they're saying. I've been participating on 4chan since 2005-2006 and I've met, some in real life, many well rounded and likeable people who participate in the anything goes, irreverent nature of the site. In fact, I live with one right now who i've known since '08. That being said, there's an often-repeated phrase on 4chan itself - 'Any community that gets its laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe that they're in good company.'A lot of the chan crowd hate us because Gaf will ban you for what they see as normal chan culture. You know, gay bashing, sexism, racism, foul language, etc. Actual moderation scares the crap out of these guys, because they are so use to chan style anything goes be as foul as possible stuff.
He did for a while. They're back on now.
You have a kawaii icon, friend. <3
True, but a slippery slope is more then just that. It's a argument that doing A leads to not just b, but c, d, e, f, g, h, i, etc, often to absurd lengths.
When there's criticism of something isn't the natural reaction to do something that reduces said criticism?
Also, isn't calling the poster cowardly and selfish a little harsh and unnecessary?
Why does she leave the comments on?
Yeah I would think he would leave them on because in the end them making a comment means he is getting a view click which is one way for him to get paid.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
There is a NeoGAF fb group?! Is it a funny place or sad?
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Slippery slope arguments are by their nature fallacious and are harmful to actual discussion.
And I think a person who can't see things outside the limited scope of their own media-based hobby is selfish, yes.
Dat Neogaf drama in the comments.
I tried to get Anita by watching a video of her's one time. It wasnt anything more than critiquing ladies' portrayal in games.
It wasn't my cup of tea, I didn't feel like she was doing anything horribly eye-opening or ground-breaking for humanity, but it's always good to see people criticize things that they feel misrepresents people. I wasn't into her though and that's fine.
Then "gamergate" happened and I didn't keep up with any of it because the idea that there are enough people hating on her that the whole thing has become a divisive movement is nuts! Like, she has some cool feminist shit to say but she isn't doing anything at all that warrents threatening her life or loins at *all* and all this whole thing has done is martyrize her and at this point she is literally being put into games.
It's nuts that big pouty idiots can fuck with someone so hard they become famous. And I'm glad she's famous at this point: almost no one should go through the shit she has, and she deserves being recognized for pushing though.
I like how much GAF is hated by those Youtube commenters. To be hated by youtube commenters = huge compliment, really.
I feel terrible for getting that reference.Holy shit you were not joking... people are just so damn angry at NeoGAF its like the forum transformed into Shadow the Hedgehog and took their candy...
I made my point politely and correctly as best I could. No need to look for a fight. I enjoy GAF as I can debate topics, even if they are new to me, without people being insulting. Thank you.
The problem with her is that she concentrates exclusively on these sorts of low hanging fruits when addressing criticism of her analysis. It's lousy that the "12 year old on CoD" subset have been giving her so much shit, but why are they worth such focus? They do it largely because of the anonymity provided by Youtube comments and Twitter. What are people looking for the company's which own these services to actually do to curb these comments? Are they to blame for creating the environment in your eyes?
You say that but how many devs have been supportive of her? The Naughty Dog guys said her work influenced them on TLOU, how many devs have come out and said she's wrong/annoying etc?
The people who hate her are all keyboard warriors or just, I don't even know why people hate her, they think she wants to change their games? Or take them away from them?
Even if you were close, the response to Anita/co. is disproportionate. Do you think that being angry at a woman pointing out gender imbalances in video games really merits death threats? I think that a lot of people on the anti-GG side are distasteful and game journalism is corrupt, but death threats, really? Are these people so threatened by gaming becoming inclusive that they needed to lose their minds?
The problem with her is that she concentrates exclusively on these sorts of low hanging fruits when addressing criticism of her analysis. It's lousy that the "12 year old on CoD" subset have been giving her so much shit, but why are they worth such focus? They do it largely because of the anonymity provided by Youtube comments and Twitter. What are people looking for the company's which own these services to actually do to curb these comments? Are they to blame for creating the environment in your eyes?
Because the way we discuss it here saying "That's awful" is basically worthless.
Fight? Oh please. I challenged your points firmly. You're like that other guy who acted like a martyr for being called out on their fallacious dross.
sexism is the status quo in games. how is it going to ever get better without people criticizing it?
and the big figureheads of gamergate are all grown ass men. this problem is a lot bigger than a few bored teens trying to push the boundaries.
Keep up the great work Anita. Thank you for standing up and facing these issues and these imbeciles.
For a little while in the middle of that talk she lost her composure a little and for a moment you could see just how much weight she has to carry on her shoulders.
Fuck the haters. Fuck those gaters.
That this is even a thing that is happening is so depressing. Ever since this industry's birth, we've done nothing but fight people who've tried to destroy and marginalize our hobby, being as classy as we could all the while. Now the industry has mainstream acceptance and the old demons are gone, but we're still fighting. We need to stop.
Unfortunately, It seems like the root of this problem is that most people don't understand that criticism is not the same as an attack. This is more of a problem with human psychology in general though, so I wouldn't even know where to start fixing this.
So what is the problem - my point is that for normal AAA games I worry the end game may result in some devs not making the 'knight saving the princess in the tower' or games like TLOU before the 'influence'. OK not greatest example but hope it portrays what I mean.
I 100 % think there are many games that are a million times worse and are more deserving of movement to change them, some of the Japanese school game stuff needs to be addressed and is just wrong.
This should be the focus, not TLOU type games is my point..
You say that but how many devs have been supportive of her? The Naughty Dog guys said her work influenced them on TLOU, how many devs have come out and said she's wrong/annoying etc?
The people who hate her are all keyboard warriors or just, I don't even know why people hate her, they think she wants to change their games? Or take them away from them?