Also, I didn't notice before, but you used the term "fake" to describe the vagina of a trans woman. Keep that in mind.
At any rate, the analogy (as with the previous one) is not meant to offend. It's to explain the very question you asked me here.
I'd never treat a trans-gendered woman like man; I wouldn't even do such a thing to a trans-woman; but I retain my body's right to be turned off by such a thing, regardless of how illogical it may seem (the logical part of our brain simply doesn't control such things, what can you do?)
First date topic. Hell, it should be brought up the moment either person asks the other out on a date.
It is, though. I meant, for the record, natural in the sense of being born that way. Artificial being something changed (esp. by man). And before you go there, if my wife got a sex change, I would not be with her in the same way.
Also, I didn't notice before, but you used the term "fake" to describe the vagina of a trans woman. Keep that in mind.
At any rate, the analogy (as with the previous one) is not meant to offend. It's to explain the very question you asked me here.
That's fine as long as you're treating a transgendered individual like they want to be treated outside of not being involved romantically with them.
But I bet you're probably on the cusp of overcoming that last hurdle!
If someone identifies as a woman, then they are one.
Ha, I'm married so I doubt it'll ever happen.
you should actually read my post instead of just looking at the words, brah
I wasn't aware race and gender wet comparable. . Probably because it isn't true.
This is the part of the thread where you quietly back out because you have no idea about the concept of gender
I think, when it comes to things like choosing a mate, a lot of people have a relatively narrow internal definition of gender that doesn't account for plumbing changes. And yes it's a bummer but people can't pick what turns them on or off.I'm not sure that's a good analogy for this. Let me use a simple example. Say he was dating some girl. he really liked her. He was making all the right moves, of course they were sleeping together and all, and he finds out she's half black. He then proceeds to storm out and stop dating her. Why when he's enjoyed her company so long? Well, as he put it "I'm not into black girls!" I think at THAT point you would have a closer analogy.
See, I'm gay because I'm sexually and emotionally attracted to men. I don't feel that way towards women generally. If I DID however I don't feel so completely invested in my identity as a gay male that I would suppress my feelings because "I'm not into girls." What would be the point of such denial on my part except heterophobia? I mean, people are people and they like what they like.
I'm not telling you you would have to like a trans girl at all. I'm not trying to make any sort of value judgment. But I think that this is not so much a matter of personal taste, this is more narrowly about investment in a personal identity such that if a person was enjoying the company of a girl, and was even intimate with the girl and found no particular difference with any other girl they had been with, there is no rational reason to be upset with the situation except the lie of omission. Still, I get the sense that a large number of people are almost... afraid that they might like a trans girl and I never really got that. It seems an incredibly random fear to me, I mean, if you find someone attractive does it REALLY matter what their plumbing used to be?
No, I disagree. Because if that were really true, why would you get your gender changed...?
No, I disagree. Because if that were really true, why would you get your gender changed...?
I don't give a fuck if you don't find me attractive.
If sexes are so much set in stone then why are there things like hermaprodites?
No, I disagree. Because if that were really true, why would you get your gender changed...?
I have. So which part of my response was incorrect? Please, elucidate.
No, I disagree. Because if that were really true, why would you get your gender changed...?
So that how you are treated matches how you feel?
They didn't get their gender changed. They got their sex changed.
This. Take pictures of any cis women, no matter how attractive, and then tell your straight male friends that they are trans. Most of them will "be able to tell" every damn time.
Yeah, and if a fat person believes in being slim and still undergoes a liposuction, that makes no sense.
You don't get your gender changed, you get a sex reassignment surgery...
Gender is something you're born with irregardless of what's between your legs... as we learn more about developmental biology we are noticing this is a fact...
The sex of the person starts and ends with their reproductive organs & some physical structure...
it was satirical
Or, to be more specific, you are changing your bodys appearance to more accurately reflect the gender you identify as, which canbut not always!include genital surgery.
I applaud those who take the extra step to be closer to what they feel and to be happy in life and I'll wholeheartedly support you until the day I die. But for a man to be artificially altered and say he is 100% woman is an insult to my mom, my wife, my daughter and my sisters. You are not as much a woman as they are and you never will be. You are a transwoman, now and for the rest of your life.
Do these 'women in your life' share this attitude or do they even care? Or did you decide by yourself what's an insult to them?
I think, when it comes to things like choosing a mate, a lot of people have a relatively narrow internal definition of gender that doesn't account for plumbing changes. And yes it's a bummer but people can't pick what turns them on or off.
People are obligated to treat everyone with respect but they're not obligated to start or stay in a relationship if they're not comfortable in it. It's not always possible to apply rationality to something that's almost entirely predicated on emotions.
All of this is true, but I just don't think people are giving the other side enough credit infiguring how difficult this is.
Again, I dated a guy recently who I had read, initially, as Latino. After a few dates, I learned that he was actually a fair-skinned African American. I really didn't care what his "real" race is, but what if I did? I'm betting at least some people do. What if my sexuality were constructed in such a way that I just can't stand the thought of getting it on with a black guy, and any attraction I had to him vanished once I knew that he was "really" black? Is that just racist animus? Authentic personal sexuality? Both?
His race has never changed, for one. For two, that's your own thing, I guess.
And for three, I thought race wasn't an appropriate example earlier.
Personally I don't care, people are obsessed with labelling everything. If you like someone, you like them. If you don't, you don't. I would be considered heterosexual but I can't say 100% that I wouldn't be interested if a transgender gal came along, who I had an amazing connection with.
Yeah, you stated your opinion, and you also didn't do a ton to explicate why you felt that race wasn't a valid analogy.
His race never changed, but my perception of it did. He was indistinguishable from a Latino to me at first, and I later learned that he was "really" black, in a pretty similar way that a trans person can be indistinguishable from a "genetic girl" and later someone learns that she's "really" trans. The analogy gets at something previous race-based ones don't: the fact that the revulsion is intellectual and ideological, rather than instinctual and spontaneous. I was attracted to him physically, based on everything I saw, when I thought he was Latino. In our hypothetical, it was only when I learned that he was black, a piece of knowledge that doesn't change his appearance in the slightest, that I got turned off. This mirrors the situation of a trans person who passes well perfectly- our hypothetical straight man was totally attracted to her until he learned a fact that in no way changed her appearance, and all of a sudden found himself uninterested.
I'm not sure that's a good analogy for this. Let me use a simple example. Say he was dating some girl. he really liked her. He was making all the right moves, of course they were sleeping together and all, and he finds out she's half black. He then proceeds to storm out and stop dating her. Why when he's enjoyed her company so long? Well, as he put it "I'm not into black girls!" I think at THAT point you would have a closer analogy.
See, I'm gay because I'm sexually and emotionally attracted to men. I don't feel that way towards women generally. If I DID however I don't feel so completely invested in my identity as a gay male that I would suppress my feelings because "I'm not into girls." What would be the point of such denial on my part except heterophobia? I mean, people are people and they like what they like.
I'm not telling you you would have to like a trans girl at all. I'm not trying to make any sort of value judgment. But I think that this is not so much a matter of personal taste, this is more narrowly about investment in a personal identity such that if a person was enjoying the company of a girl, and was even intimate with the girl and found no particular difference with any other girl they had been with, there is no rational reason to be upset with the situation except the lie of omission. Still, I get the sense that a large number of people are almost... afraid that they might like a trans girl and I never really got that. It seems an incredibly random fear to me, I mean, if you find someone attractive does it REALLY matter what their plumbing used to be?
Sounds like a horrible movie featuring Adam Sandler and Martin Lawrence. *shudders*i would love to see a transgendered man and a transgendered woman dating eachother without knowing
Sounds like a horrible movie featuring Adam Sandler and Martin Lawrence. *shudders*
He's basically saying in harsh terms that woman does not equal transwoman, which is basically the truth. And it's for that reason that Id also think certain information needs to be disclosed early. The thought of a "transition" for many is too much to get over, and it shouldn't be assumed that people can just handle it
Now are trans insults to men/women? No. But I don't think he was saying that's the case either
.without question.
it's not even about telling them. even if you don't say anything, just sending the pic of a hot chick to them can throw up red flags.
"why did he send this pic to me of this hot chick" *starts staring intensely* +only a few options to consider+
So, for all those saying it is a 'first date' or 'first 5 minutes' thing, would you expect someone to tell you they were infertile in that time frame?
Would you tell a muslim there is pork in the casserole before or after he eats from it? You know the pork casserole is perfectly fine and tasty as fuck, but you also know that there is a high chance that he will be very upset when he finds out what he ate.
When do you tell him? Before or after?
Relationships should be about trust. Not disclosing who you are goes against this.That is an unbelievably terrible analogy. 'Hi, my name is James, and I am transgendered, would you like to go to a movie?'. Really?
That is an unbelievably terrible analogy. 'Hi, my name is James, and I am transgendered, would you like to go to a movie?'. Really?
I'm sorry, but i translated "first date" as an euphemism for "before sex". I was not aware that you meant 'do i have to tell him before we watch that jack and jill movie".
You tell him before sex and before eating the casserole. That's my position. And the analogy still works.
Relationships should be about trust. Not disclosing who you are goes against this.
I would never ever date a transgendered person.
I specifically said 'first date' and 'first 5 minutes'. But of course you tell them before you have sex if they are not already aware. If sex is the casserole I agree with you completely. I was looking at the movie as the casserole.