or maybe you play hzd2 and it's ass they just messed it up bad but you need to scratch that itch so you play the first one again and you don't even have to drag the ps4 outPicture the scene: you just put down 500 hard-earned readies for the new and advanced Xbox Two Pro Scarlett. You unbox your shiny new toy and plug it into your 52-inch 4K HDR TV.
You think 'I know, I'm gonna load up that old gem Crackdown 3. It played like a 2007 game when it was released in 2019, and I'll enjoy it even more in 2020' .
Being serious, the point is this; on a next gen console there should be enough content to keep you busy for a long ass time. If you're considering old BC games right away it means content is lacking (that goes for PS5 too). Sure it's a handy feature. But not at the expense of boundary-pushing next gen AAAA titles.
I mean after 8 years PS5/XboxTwo will be unshackled from the constraints of a Jaguar netbook CPU with their first-party output. I want to be far too busy getting my mind blown in Horizon Zero Dawn 2 than thinking of loading up Sea of Thieves. If I want that I'll just plug in an Xbox One.
Isn’t that because it cost too much to put a ps2 cpu in every ps3? And then the PS3 has its issues with CELL so emulation is even harder there.Sony already did and I could never care about even after they removed it
So...if Sony made a ps5 hzd remaster you are not interested to buy right?Picture the scene: you just put down 500 hard-earned readies for the new and advanced Xbox Two Pro Scarlett. You unbox your shiny new toy and plug it into your 52-inch 4K HDR TV.
You think 'I know, I'm gonna load up that old gem Crackdown 3. It played like a 2007 game when it was released in 2019, and I'll enjoy it even more in 2020' .
Being serious, the point is this; on a next gen console there should be enough content to keep you busy for a long ass time. If you're considering old BC games right away it means content is lacking (that goes for PS5 too). Sure it's a handy feature. But not at the expense of boundary-pushing next gen AAAA titles.
I mean after 8 years PS5/XboxTwo will be unshackled from the constraints of a Jaguar netbook CPU with their first-party output. I want to be far too busy getting my mind blown in Horizon Zero Dawn 2 than thinking of loading up Sea of Thieves. If I want that I'll just plug in an Xbox One.
Hey tried some ways... full hardware, only CPU, and full emulation to the end remove it completely.Isn’t that because it cost too much to put a ps2 cpu in every ps3? And then the PS3 has its issues with CELL so emulation is even harder there.
This is kind of what Microsoft is banking on: by offering backwards compatibility for their old catalogue along with not-insignificant upgrades to the games, they can compensate for an overall lack of new titles. Almost every new system suffers from this problem after it launches. To be able to use enhanced versions of your old games may not have been as important in the past because a big part of upgrading your system was to play drastically improved games. Nowadays, the payoff for graphical advancement is smaller and smaller.Another interesting point is, what happens to PS plus games that I got for my ps4. will they work on ps5 ?. which means I won't be buying any new games for a while cuz I will just play all those games rock solid 60 fps or 30 without stutter.
The attach rate for PS4 owners is about 9.6 games. Since we know there are tons of PS4 gamers who own far more than 10 games, that means a lot of households only have three to five games (the Minecraft, Fortnite, and yearly Madden players I mentioned above).
The players who own more than the average are your "hardcore" customers who are already locked into your ecosystem. Getting them onboard is easy whether you have backwards compatibility or not. The people who own fewer than 10 games aren't interested in a new system with a ton of new, foreign games. They are typically your late adopters. However, maybe you can entice them with "this plays your whole library with a lot of extra enhancements, too".
BC hasn't made a huge difference so far, but maybe this time it'll be different.
So you're saying as a current owner of PS4 and as an above-average customer of their brand, you won't be sticking with this brand unless your existing games are supported?I have more than 10 games and getting me "onboard" won't be happening if the PS5 doesn't offer bc. The reason bc hasn't made a big difference so far on consoles is because digital game librarys weren't a big thing in previous console gens. Now they are and it's ridiculous to expect people, especially hardcore gamers to give them up and just move on. Try doing that with pc owners and there'd be riots
As I consumer I really think consoles should have BC.
As a business I would think BC is a good idea because it keeps people locked in your ecosystem, if I have a bunch of games on my ps4 and they're supported on ps5, I'm much less likely to switch to the green team where I'd be unable to play those games.
I genuinely do not understand the large contingent that thinks backwards compatibility is a killer app. History says it is not. I really don't understand.
Personally, I never wanted to play a PS3 game on my PS4.
So you're saying as a current owner of PS4 and as an above-average customer of their brand, you won't be sticking with this brand unless your existing games are supported?
I genuinely do not understand the large contingent that thinks backwards compatibility is a killer app. History says it is not. I really don't understand.
Personally, I never wanted to play a PS3 game on my PS4.