Super_Cobra
Member
WW1 with jet packs so you can double jump and dash through the air, is my guess of what will happen. Lol
As I've already said, WW1 does not lend itself well to the Battlefield series. If you want a WW1 shooter, you can always try Verdun.
WW1 with jet packs so you can double jump and dash through the air, is my guess of what will happen. Lol
WW1 with jet packs so you can double jump and dash through the air, is my guess of what will happen. Lol
Why even bother then? Just make another 2124.
Battlefield series still hasn't hit its peak these past few gens in terms of a futuristic playing field. They had that one 2185 on PC or whatever
As I've already said, WW1 does not lend itself well to the Battlefield series. If you want a WW1 shooter, you can always try Verdun.
Verdun is focused on.....Verdun, it does not have the scope or anything of WWI.
I'd like to know how it doesn't lend itself well?
You had Boats, Zepplins, planes, Tanks, rifles, mg's, Light mg's, shotguns, all sorts of melee things from spades to brass knuckles to maces.
Then you have the maps. WWI was not simply fought in the western front (with the trenches), the eastern front never devolved into the trench warfare like the western front did. You had a huge amount of fighting all over the world.
Here's a quick video series that shows the scope of the war by the year, look at how faster paced and how much the lines moved around on the eastern front vs the deadlocked western front.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbwH1ZBnYds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSzHDW0IsoE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-b746J2SdI
I agree. Both launched and worked day one.
BF4 was at system launch being rushed out for these consoles that did not even have fully fleshed out SDK's or Firmware stability yet. But their second and third attempt this gen with more polished SDK's, even a RUSHED less than 2 years from design to game Battlefront both went off without a hitch.
Verdun is focused on.....Verdun, it does not have the scope or anything of WWI.
I'd like to know how it doesn't lend itself well?
You had Boats, Zepplins, planes, Tanks, rifles, mg's, Light mg's, shotguns, all sorts of melee things from spades to brass knuckles to maces.
Then you have the maps. WWI was not simply fought in the western front (with the trenches), the eastern front never devolved into the trench warfare like the western front did. You had a huge amount of fighting all over the world.
Here's a quick video series that shows the scope of the war by the year, look at how faster paced and how much the lines moved around on the eastern front vs the deadlocked western front.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbwH1ZBnYds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSzHDW0IsoE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-b746J2SdI
BF3 was mess at launch and wasn't fixed for months. THe last gen versions of BF4 was broke as hell too. No next gen/SDK excuse there.
So argue yourself to the past then, while the most recent two newest examples have launched working.
If it's alternate history to the degree Wolfenstein was, I'm out. Hopefully, that degree of "alternate" was the discrepency, but as others have pointed out, I'd rather have proper WW1 first before people try to mix it up.
Hardline launched functional (if horrendously imbalanced), but BF4? DICE LA put together the pieces of an otherwise broken game back in 2014, but BF4's launch was horrendous. Nobody seems to remember how bad that game was at launch; it was unplayable. Entire servers crashed for seemingly no reason, progress wouldn't record after matches, and don't even get me started on the hit detection and broken killcams.
you forgot about battlefront. unless it's somehow exempt from dices track record because it has a star wars license?
No, I didn't. It's just not a Battlefield game, which is what the discussion was about. It may use the same engine, but they are far from the same game.
I think he was referring to the technical aspects, not the gameplay.
Game Informer is going to have their cover reveal next Tuesday. Some are speculating that it could be Titanfall 2 given the recent leaks and because GI revealed the original. But they also revealed BF3 before its GDC presentation. And BF4 was also revealed at GDC.
Another one? Yawn. And lol at WW1 being "boring" Jesus Christ.Please don't be WWI, so boring. Just be a modern shooter, no futurist jump pack bullshit, and I'll bite.
Another one? Yawn. And lol at WW1 being "boring" Jesus Christ.
Final mission where you're sent over the top of the trenches would be intense.
The one thing has been done to death and the other hasn't had a AAA release.Opinions. Crazy stuff right?
So no pre GDC teasers. Looks like there'll be no announcement this week. Bugger.
Here's to hoping they'll surprise us
The re-used BF4 font (literally the exact same font with no dirt/grime) makes it look so fake.Potential leak for BF5:https://imgur.com/a/x0oYY
Potential leak for BF5:https://imgur.com/a/x0oYY
Potential leak for BF5:https://imgur.com/a/x0oYY
Leak said:Revisit fan favourite Battlefield 4 maps.
Siege of Shanghai 2016
Operation Locker 2016
Golmund Railway 2016
Zavod 311 2016
Battlefield 4 Final Stand was set in 2020 - going back to 2016 is mighty suspicious.
I had 0 issues with BF4 up until Naval Strike launched, and I played it religiously. Some serious hyperbole about how bad it was.
Should have been 3D printed if they wanted it to appear legitimate. That's the standard now.Potential leak for BF5:https://imgur.com/a/x0oYY
Potential leak for BF5:https://imgur.com/a/x0oYY
Should have been 3D printed if they wanted it to appear legitimate. That's the standard now.
Potential leak for BF5:https://imgur.com/a/x0oYY
What a lazy fake...