Lol at specs being important for nintendo hardware.
If the marketing is good, the console will sell just fine. See how good the initial reveal video was perceived. Most people will see ads in that genre. The WiiU was a mostake because of the bad marketing and name. Lots of people thought it was a Wii accessory
2014 on PS4 was saved for me by Alien Isolation, Mordor and Wolfenstein. All of those were surprisingly awesome games. But again, those were all cross-gen too.I think everyone pretty much agrees that the hardware itself, the pricing, and positioning were all great. There's no doubt that the PS4 immediately assumed the thought lead and became the go-to hardware for AAA games.
But when it comes to the software coming down the pipeline in the first year, it was a stumble. Ghosts is not regarded as a good CoD. Watch_Dogs was widely regarded as not living up to potential. AC4 was viewed as superfluous, Unity was the technical disaster. Destiny had an extremely underwhelming launch critically -- it's a testament to Bungie's hard work that the game's reputation recovered.
Sony had Knack (generally held to be bad), InFamous, and Killzone (generally held to be forgettable). Other major titles included Thief 4, Wolfenstein TNO, and Murdered: Soul Suspect, and I think a late port of Tomb Raider. SKU counts collapsed across all publishers. Major indie titles included Resogun (excellent), Outlast (also excellent), ports of PS3's indie games, and TowerFall Ascension.
Probably the only unexpected success in the first year of the XBO/PS4 was Middle-Earth: Shadow of Mordor and there were many unexpected disappointments
It was a rough transition for the industry and even though PS4 got all the third party support, it was a pretty anemic year in general.
PS1 stumbled at first? I thought it was a smash hit from day 1.
Yeah... I would feel better about the price if it had a pack-in of some kind, but oh well. I fully expect that we'll have a version with Mario or some other big title for the same $300 this holiday.
Explain the Wii U then. Because I'm not sure where you're going with this since none of those titles are singular roads to a console success story.The common consumer also buys Zelda, Mario Kart, Splatoon and Mario so I'm not exactly sure where you're going with this
The common consumer also buys Zelda, Mario Kart, Splatoon and Mario so I'm not exactly sure where you're going with this
I'm convinced people had a harder time understanding that the Wii U was a next generation up from the Wii. That may have doomed it early. Pokemon, Zelda, and Mario Kart sold tons on the 3DS.Explain the Wii U then. Because I'm not sure where you're going with this since none of those titles are singular roads to a console success story.
The dock is a charger and HDMI passthrough, nothing more. The concept of being "powerful" is as applicable to the Switch dock as it is to a desktop USB hub.They could've made the dock more powerful...
I guarantee you if the switch had specs even CLOSE to an xbox one the backlash would be dramatically reduced by that fact alone.
Explain the Wii U then. Because I'm not sure where you're going with this since none of those titles are singular roads to a console success story.
Does the common consumer even know what Splatoon is?
What are you talking about? PS4 launch year sucked dude
You had Resogun and Infamous and that was basically it
Meanwhile, while I fully admit the Switch's launch is anemic, you're getting Mario Kart, Splatoon, Mario, and Fire Emblem Warriors all within the first year
That is WAY better than the PS4's first year any way you slice it
Yes, but not at first. I see this being like the 3DS or DS, or even the PS1. Where it starts slow out of the gate, with sluggish sales and little fanfare, then following a price drop and compelling software releases, it starts catching on with the masses. I don't see this being a Wii U style failure since Nintendo has been doing a much better job marketing and design wise with the Switch.
I think that's only one piece of puzzle to the Wii U's failure.I'm convinced people had a harder time understanding that the Wii U was a next generation up from the Wii. That may have doomed it early. Pokemon, Zelda, and Mario Kart sold tons on the 3DS.
But then the cost would be higher? Would people be excited if it had the power of an XBONE but launched at $350 or higher?
.
Nintendo making profit and getting 40-50 million consoles into homes would be a success in my book.Is that really a success though? If the 3ds was 63million and the wii u was 13 million and the new combined system sells 40 million isn't that like half the market they had before? Wasn't combining the efforts supposed to strengthen their position?
I'm convinced people had a harder time understanding that the Wii U was a next generation up from the Wii. That may have doomed it early. Pokemon, Zelda, and Mario Kart sold tons on the 3DS.
You seriously want to compare the first years?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_4_games
It's not even close, you Nintendo diehards never cease to amaze. PS4 had plenty of great games 1 year in.
And Zelda is available on WiiU (the version i'm getting).
The one thing I would say in the Switch's favor is that even if Nintendo doesn't announce any more games for 2017, it's lineup over the first 9 months won't be nearly as disastrous as the Wii U's was.Explain the Wii U then. Because I'm not sure where you're going with this since none of those titles are singular roads to a console success story.
It sold five millions on Wii U so yeah
What is wrong with the price exactly? Sure, it's not as powerful as a PS4, but it's a lot of tech crammed into a small space and has an actual screen on it too. Not to mention the dock. The price seems fair to me, or maybe I can't properly judge how much these devices should be made for and in turn what price is reasonable to sell at to make a profit.
Isnt 2 million first month their goal?
What is wrong with the price exactly? Sure, it's not as powerful as a PS4, but it's a lot of tech crammed into a small space and has an actual screen on it too. Not to mention the dock. The price seems fair to me, or maybe I can't properly judge how much these devices should be made for and in turn what price is reasonable to sell at to make a profit.
The internet has in the last 2 or 3 years just gave me the impression that everything is an over reaction. Quite sad since I used to think it was a source of well thought out arguments and discussions at times.
I have seen a lot of people not recognizing the fact that you can get Zelda on the WiiU. If anything.. The WiiU is probably a better deal right out of the gate.
I think people saying "well the specs aren't high enough so it should be cheaper" are missing the real issue.
If you don't have an Xbox One, PS4, or Switch, and all three are the same price (and all three have pay online, and the Switch has the most expensive extra controllers but also sort of a second controller packed in), but the Xbox One and PS4 have 4 years worth of excellent games available for cheap and all the hottest new releases, while the Switch has Nintendo games and a handful of versions of third party games, most of which will almost by definition have smaller communities or technical limitations or both, then the Switch is going to seem like a worse value for a lot of people. It's true, Nintendo games count for a lot. That's why there are 12 million Wii Us sold and not 0.
If you do have an Xbox One or PS4, maybe you would consider the Switch as a second console. You'll buy most of your stuff on your primary console, but you'll check out Nintendo games. But the $300 upfront barrier, plus online subscription if you want to play online, makes it a much bigger hurdle when you know you could get 4 or 5 new release games for your primary console for the same price.
But the other major risk is that the Switch launches at $300 and then within 6 months the Xbox One or PS4 get to $249 or $199 or they are $299 with aggressive bundles that have two or three games. Now all the problems I mentioned above are actually exacerbated.
Now, maybe you say that there's a target audience with families who love Nintendo games and don't want AAA shooters because their kids are too young or whatever. I buy that, for sure. Except that almost everything in the kid/family market segment has run for mobile and tablets, which the family already has, and among licensed movie games, they can get those on Wii U, and if they want to buy a dedicated system, it seems to me like it still wouldn't be obvious that they'd pick the Switch as that system even just for family-dedicated titles.
I think if the value proposition of the Switch is "well, it's like the Wii U, except we stopped making a dedicated handheld so now you need one of these to play the games you used to play on the 3DS", then it will do better than Wii U but a lot worse than Wii U and 3DS put together.
(Full disclosure: I'm trying to choose between GameCube tier and "above GameCube and Wii U" tier)
Huh? PS1 exploded out of the gate for its day. It surpassed total Saturn sales in its first month.
The dock is a charger and HDMI passthrough, nothing more. The concept of being "powerful" is as applicable to the Switch dock as it is to a desktop USB hub.