I dunno.. COD can move consoles at this point. If you create a product that can generate hype and appeal enough, people will be willing to make the jump.
Why are people so concerned with who gets a marketing deal? What difference does it make to you?
ughhhhh:
I'm not even sure I like the Destiny bit as well. So it's titanfall x destiny.
No Wii U, no sale.
Wii U version
#Believe
To be fair, that's probably XB1 footage, and AW was farmed out to another dev for last gen development, so Sledgehammer were only making the current gen version anyway.
I think that's the best we can expect for 1080p 60fps for COD, its a lot better than sub HD, with barely 60fps like last gen
I dunno.. COD can move consoles at this point. If you create a product that can generate hype and appeal enough, people will be willing to make the jump.
Wat? Advanced Warfare already wasn't on Wii U.
ughhhhh:
I'm not even sure I like the Destiny bit as well. So it's titanfall x destiny.
Thanks for stopping by.Haha people think next gen only matters. Its COD its using the same damn engine. Its going to be turd, the last true COD was 4.
And as always don't buy it on PC its going to be turd
- No Server browser
- No rent-able servers
- No private Servers
- Artificial Latency(40-50 extra latency for no reason)
- No mods
- No no fov slider
- 90 FPS cap.
GG
Also Xbox will still have the Marketing as will the CoD Champs
Oh and it looks terrible.
Yeah but that was a new studio. And Treyarch has always made de Wii and Wii U versionWat? Advanced Warfare already wasn't on Wii U.
No it did not. It is PR-talk, but they use the same old engine with the same old flaws. Damn their marketing is really good, because I read that crap everywhere.
No it didn't it was "updated" but its still the very same core engine. Thats why PC versions lately have been capped at 90. Because the devs are two lazy and tied some of the weapon fire rates to the FPS.Engine changed a while ago dude.
Why are people so concerned with who gets a marketing deal? What difference does it make to you?
No it didn't it was "updated" but its still the very same core engine.
So uhh was this a typo or is it legit confirmed?
No Wii U, no sale.
I just really wish I can play cod on my console of choice, a man can dream. I still play B02 on wii u to this day
Yep! They just tack on new graphics tech but as you can see in the screenshots its not doing much these days.They're still using the old Quake engine?!?!? Fucking hell that is beyond ancient at this point. You'd figure all the money they are making would be enough to fund development of a new engine for crying out loud.
black ops 2 had a 90 fov slider, and a 200fps cap on pc.
No Wii U, no sale.
No loss.
No loss.
No loss.
How's the online community these days? I haven't fired it up in a while, and at that time it was around the 3,000 mark.
They're still using the old Quake engine?!?!? Fucking hell that is beyond ancient at this point. You'd figure all the money they are making would be enough to fund development of a new engine for crying out loud.
Just to reiterate:
Looks like I'll be skipping cods till they do away with the awful jetpack gimmicksurprised a publisher like activision would ditch the last gen systems.
uughhh... if this is true, I will be extremely disappointed.
It's not the "old quake engine" it's absolutely silly and incorrect when people say that. Having some legacy code does not mean it's the same engine.They're still using the old Quake engine?!?!? Fucking hell that is beyond ancient at this point. You'd figure all the money they are making would be enough to fund development of a new engine for crying out loud.
Just to reiterate:
Eh. When your emphasis is on framerate above everything else, I don't blame them for keeping that core. New engines are always built on top of old cores.
edit: Christ, Windows is still built upon DOS.
It's not the "old quake engine" it's absolutely silly and incorrect when people say that. Having some legacy code does not mean it's the same engine.
Advanced Warfare on PS360 was not the same engine as current gen versions and it was in no way being held back by technology...as evident by the fact that it was using advanced technically.
Its the same engine. They just stub on new graphics technology.It's not the "old quake engine" it's just silly when people say that. Having some legacy code does not mean it's the same engine.
Advanced Warfare on PS360 was not the same engine as current gen versions and it was in no way being held back by technology.
Agreed. BO2 also did better than ghosts. So crossing my fingers for BO3I'm sure the Wii U version of Blops 2 hell maybe even Ghost would have sold more if they bothered to release them on the Eshop.
"To be fair"
lol come the fuck on now. that is obviously just an extremely poor quality screencap.
Wat? Advanced Warfare already wasn't on Wii U.
Its the same engine. They just stub on new graphics technology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine
It's not the "same engine". Jesus.Its the same engine. They just stub on new graphics technology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine
That's because it's current genJudging from the new trailer, this game looks really not "next gen".
It's not the "same engine". Jesus.
It's like saying Far cry 1 and Ryse run the same engine as they are both iterations of the same engine with one having new graphics tech stubbed upon...see how silly that sounds?
Game engines dont work like that,the notion of naming an engine is purely arbitrary and is used only for licecing purpose.
I'm sorry but that's just bullocks. Advanced Warfare looks might fine, it uses almost every modern renderi g techniqie seen in games these days. And if you think it looks similar to last gen COD then you are factually wrong. The simple fact that it uses physically based rendering is enough to make it a legit current gen engine.Yeah, but the new Cry engine looks much better than the old one, where IW engine looks like butt.
That's because it's current gen
I'm sorry but that's just bullocks. Advanced Warfare looks might fine and if you think it looks similar to last gen COD then you are factually wrong.