I know, it just gave me a feeling of personal satisfaction seeing it at >90Meisadragon said:Metacritic really doesn't matter. As long as people enjoy playing COD games, it isn't going anywhere.
I know, it just gave me a feeling of personal satisfaction seeing it at >90Meisadragon said:Metacritic really doesn't matter. As long as people enjoy playing COD games, it isn't going anywhere.
We meet again, Adam Sessler.butter_stick said:>Zelda avatar
Pokemon? I agree, although there is a different argument to be made there that I won't get into.Gravijah said:i find it hard to find fault with a series for "being too samey" when i'm a fan of a series that people throw the same criticisms at.
jabuseika said:Modern Warfare 94
Modern Warfare 2 94
Modern Warfare 3 89
Welp, there goes the series to the trash. /notserious
Mush said:Yes, like how it was in Black Ops.
Feature said:wow no way this can score perfect on the graphics point. Not only has it never changed graphics, it looks ugly.
+ the scripted events are just annoying. Are the endless spawning enemies still there?
I'm a big Zelda fan. It doesn't change the absurdity of criticising a game like COD for being samey when Zelda games almost always have an extremely familiar design. SS looks to shake things up a bit, but let's be realistic.Biggest-Geek-Ever said:
There is a lot going on, amazing set pieces. 60FPS.excaliburps said:Exactly what I was thinking. How the hell can a game that really looks similar even be lauded for its graphics which has been relatively the same for the past 3-4 years?
His review seems a bit standard, usually Sterling goes in on topics but this review is more like something out a PR box.Biggest-Geek-Ever said:Jim Sterling has lost his touch. Am disappoint
EatChildren said:The score was already posted, but our review can be read here.
Gravijah said:did they pay you in kangaroo meat for that review?
EatChildren said:I didn't write it and they never pay us .
Gravijah said:you're missin' out, kangaroo is mighty tasty!
jabuseika said:Wow, at the user reviews on metacritic.
The rage flood.
popcorn.gifjabuseika said:Wow, at the user reviews on metacritic.
The rage flood.
The Dutch Slayer said:fixed the gif link
Bad reception confirmed. Downfall of FPS genre has begun.jabuseika said:Wow, at the user reviews on metacritic.
The rage flood.
It went from 0 to 37 negative reviews in a matter of minutes, totally authentic.
My theory is that for every pre-ordained biased negative review there is one pre-ordained biased positive one.snack said:popcorn.gif
I love it when haters take time from their day just to write a downright biased review.
EatChildren said:The score was already posted, but our review can be read here.
Source: http://www.vg247.com/2011/11/08/mw3-reviews-start-hitting-online/VG247 said:Eurogamer 8
DToid 9.5
IGN 9
GiantBomb 4/5
Edge 9
1UP A-
Videogamer 9
VentureBeat N/A
Joystiq 4.5/5
ShackNews N/A
CVG 9
Game Informer 9
Digital Spy 4/5
PSU 9
Everyeye.It 9
Gamer.no 7
Xboxygen 3/5
Eurogamer.de 9
Metro 9
The Guardian 5/5
GameTrailers 9.3
Play3.de 8.5
Yup, endless enemies are still there.Feature said:wow no way this can score perfect on the graphics point. Not only has it never changed graphics, it looks ugly.
+ the scripted events are just annoying. Are the endless spawning enemies still there?
Not only are they still in the game, but Blops had less in its entire campaign than MW3 does in the 2 hours I've played.RS4- said:Yup, endless enemies are still there.
mxgt said:Don't know why this series gets such high scores for graphics. Looks like shit on consoles and is pretty outdated visually on PC too.
SP looks great. Runs at 60fps too.mxgt said:Don't know why this series gets such high scores for graphics. Looks like shit on consoles and is pretty outdated visually on PC too.
subversus said:lol Edge is a joke. All remains of respect for them are lost.