Kenzodielocke
Banned
Review thread tomorrow, gonna be fun. Anyone have the exact time?
really, people acting like if you don't like you "don't get it" or something. It was corny and not funny to some of us. I'm no big Crash fan either, only played like the first one. Content just wasn't good IMO.I'm not exactly sure what point you have to make.
I stated my displeasure with the trailer. I agreed with certain parts, like Mario 64 being much more ambitious as a game, and i disagreed with certain parts, then saying crash was a bad game.
I reserve the right to complain about it and think they were being disingenuous on this one
And we reserve the right to call you out for being frankly ridiculous.
Sometimes I feel like a freak in this hobby because I can't frickin' stand Mario 64. I don't like the way Mario moves, i don't like the level design, the graphics, the camera, the objectives. I just don't like it at all.
Even forgetting 64 vs Ps1 I find it funny that within a playstation only bubble Crash is more beloved than all the other more open platformers that emulated M64 rather than Crash (Spyro, Jak, Ape Escape).
I looked up the actual salesThe install base of the playstation was nearly thrice as high as the one of the n64, so it's really not that unbelievable, which is probably what rustled some NintendoGAFs Jimmie so hard that they are still mad about it 20 years later
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/finance/hard_soft/index.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20110722094946/http://scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdataps_e.html
Some people prefer tight linear level design instead of running around empty spaces from one place to another doing shitty sub-quests.
Yea it's so funny haha how dare these people want classic 2D Mario level select obstacle course gameplay hahaha poor souls, I pity them for preferring to the point, tightly designed levels instead of wasting time in some shitty open world "platformer". They've yet to see the light.
Oh, you have a very common opinion honestly. And while they aren't 'ground breaking' like Mario 64 or the Banjo games, they are damn solid platformers.
It's like the evolution of the 2D platformer; taking the side-scroller and making it a forward-scroller...if that makes any sense :l.
Crash 2 is the strongest game in the trilogy while Crash 3 has a soft spot (the music and the platforming stages are really dang solid). Crash 1 aged the worst but thanks to the N. Sane Trilogy, it should be a much smoother experience gameplay/control wise.
Just glad Gaf doesn't hate the Bandicoot nearly as much compared to last year....got so bad, I pushed my remaining retrospectives on the series to other places...
Mario 64 is a shitty open world platformer huh? Lot of hot takes in this thread.
Open doesn't necessarily mean better...Even forgetting 64 vs Ps1 I find it funny that within a playstation only bubble Crash is more beloved than all the other more open platformers that emulated M64 rather than Crash (Spyro, Jak, Ape Escape).
We're on a hardcore video game forum, i dont think growing up is apart of the discussion.
So I'm assuming Smosh are Mario fanboys?
Mario 64 is a shitty open world platformer huh? Lot of hot takes in this thread.
It's the old "Oh, you think the thing I like is bad? Well,I think the thing you like is BAD!" game.
It's the internet.
No they despise everything
If I remember correctly, they actually like The Last of Us.
To be fair, presentation and graphics wise it was miles ahead of SM64, but gameplaywise... yeah open world vs linear, the difference was and still is palpable.The Crash one is not supremely negative either, pointing out that Crahs Bandicoot was less ambitious than Super Mario 64 is not exactly strange.
The Crash one is not supremely negative either, pointing out that Crahs Bandicoot was less ambitious than Super Mario 64 is not exactly strange.
I haven't seen the video yet. And if that's mainly what they've said then I don't understand all the fuss in this thread.
The Crash one is not supremely negative either, pointing out that Crahs Bandicoot was less ambitious than Super Mario 64 is not exactly strange.
Good to see we have some historical rewriting here. There's a reason the Crash series is the highest selling PS1 classics and sold some of the most of any game on the PS1 at the time. And it's not because they were "ok".
i would recommend you watch it, and then come to a conclusion
Or maybe people acyually enjoyed those games without resorting to fanboy nonsense comparing them with SM64?I do wonder how old some of the Crash fans are. Maybe it's a rose colored glasses thing?
I haven't seen the video yet. And if that's the crux of their argument then I don't understand what all the fuss is about in this thread.
I do wonder how old some of the Crash fans are. Maybe it's a rose colored glasses thing?
I was 10 when I got a PSX. I don't think I even remember anyone in my school saying crash was better than Mario 64. Mario 64 was a huge wow moment in gaming.
They also made some comments about his grotesque character design
I understand why some people would be down on this video, Smosh ripped in to crash whilst praising Mario 64. They talk about linear gameplay as if it's a bad thing.
Actually, I disagree with quite few things in this video.
Yeah lol. I still think the design is fine.
Jason Rubin said last week that all 3 Crash games outsold Mario 64.
Or maybe people acyually enjoyed those games without resorting to fanboy nonsense comparing them with SM64?
Do some really think these games are so bad that the only way people can think fondly of them is because nostalgia?
Edit: this is not per se directed at you, but it's something I've seen quite a few times.
They also made some comments about his grotesque character design
OR maybe they honestly just like it more. I dunno.
Gex was always the real MVP. Mario, Sonic, Crash and the rest of the prentenders to the thrown can go suck eggs.
I only got to play the Crash games sometime way past release, like 2006, and they just never took hold of me. I tried coming at them with an open mind but I feel like part of the love of that series really was a "you had to be there" moment.
I know it's an unpopular opinion, but I've never found the Crash games to be as good as such a large fan base would make you think.
I mean, MARIO 64 was just on a completely different level: more open, more variety, real 3D, better camera, more varied gameplay, more varied environments, etc etc.
And if you consider it a 2D title, it just doesn't come near the best Mario and Sonic and DK have to offer.
Ignoring it's less ambitious design, the control never felt as tight or fluid as the bests in the genre.
That said, glad those that do love the games are getting what looks like a really well-done remake here very soon!
Running towards the camera is a bad idea though, I dunno why they thought that was good. Even if it isn't absolutely terrible, its always been a bit weird.
I don't know. It's Smosh and they're obviously just jokingly bringing up some of the mentallity that was going around at the time of the games original release.
Honestly don't understand why some people are getting riled up over this. This brand of humour has been their stick since forever.
Probably talking combined, because Mario 64 sold 11,91 Million on N64...
Can't the same be said for all early 3d games? The fact is that none of the 3d games from that era hold up. Even games considered some of the best of all time like Mario 64/Zelda do not hold up well. They're shit by the standards we expect today. I can't see how anybody can argue any different.
Running towards the camera is a bad idea though, I dunno why they thought that was good. Even if it isn't absolutely terrible, its always been a bit weird.
Being more "open" does not necessarily make for a better experience. Mario's levels mostly consist of empty voids with level objectives ranging from completely trivial to totally obtuse, with very little of the tight, precision based navigation through enemies and obstacles that made the previous entries such a joy to master. As a fan of classic platforming, it's clear that Crash passed the torch into 3D far better than Mario 64 could ever dream of.
And you can tell who's just hating when they say the games don't hold up bs. Crash 1 is the only one that feels dated. Crash 2 in particular is to this day an absolute joy to play and an unquestionable must for anyone who pretends to be a fan of platformers.
Mario 64 holds up extremely well by the standards of today. Like honestly outside of camera control and arguably graphics, Mario 64 could come out right now as some indie platformer thing and would fit right in.
Doesn't that take the DS and Wii version into account?
Edit: sorry for the double post.