EdibleKnife
Member
I'm really boggled as to why his wife said he didn't have a weapon.
I've already mentioned before but it's completely possible he bought a weapon without his wife's knowledge.
I'm really boggled as to why his wife said he didn't have a weapon.
Possessing a weapon alone is enough? We have seen videos of other people who have shot and killed, or shot at others and have not been killed by the police. They were possessing weapons at the moment of their capture.
Guns are legal.
How do you know this is true? I have to admit that saying "I heard it on the news" (what I've said) isn't really compelling or convincing either, but I don't know. I'm not so sure that people can aim and shoot accurately, in the millisecond it takes for someone to raise their arm.
Why would I want black friends?
I've already mentioned before but it's completely possible he bought a weapon without his wife's knowledge.
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
How do you know this is true? I have to admit that saying "I heard it on the news" (what I've said) isn't really compelling or convincing either, but I don't know. I'm not so sure that people can aim and shoot accurately, in the millisecond it takes for someone to raise their arm.
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
I was a cop in the military for six years. I have enough real world experience and training to know what I'm talking about. If he would have tried anything he would have been dead before he got any accurate shots off, but he's fucking dead anyways.
He wasn't complying, but he wasn't showing an intent to use the weapon at all.
This such a trash ass commentOr she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
Well, I'm not in a position to argue with you then. If what I heard on the news is true though, the police might still classify these situations as justified shootings. Personally, I still get it. I think that anyone who doesn't drop a weapon when instructed is communicating an intent to use it. But if it's true that the police can easily disable someone, the instant they move to use their weapon, it would obviously be better to wait for that moment.
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
I now want to know what they edited.
Are you serious? Anyone already pointing their gun at a target will surely shoot and hit that target before someone that has their hands at their sides has a chance to raise and aim. These are trained...officers we're talking about, not civilians.
http://nation.time.com/2013/09/16/ready-fire-aim-the-science-behind-police-shooting-bystanders/According to a 2008 RAND Corporation study evaluating the New York Police Department’s firearm training, between 1998 and 2006, the average hit rate during gunfights was just 18 percent. When suspects did not return fire, police officers hit their targets 30 percent of the time.
The data show what any police officer who has ever been involved in a shooting can tell you–firing accurately in a stressful situation is extremely hard. In an article for TIME last year, Amanda Ripley looked what happens in the brain and body when shots are fired. The brain stem sends out signals that cause blood vessels to constrict and hormones to surge. Studies have shown that eyesight becomes narrower (literally tunnel vision) under such conditions. People who have been in gunfights describe hearing very little and perceieve time slowing down. Amid this chaos, as police officers have to make difficult, split-second decisions, humans can lose motor skills as the body reverts to basic fight or flight instincts.
<snip>
The NYPD has some of the most comprehensive and sophisticated firearms training of any police force in the country, using a combination of live fire, non-lethal force and simulated scenarios.
On your first point there's a huge difference between being in the hand or in a holster.
Of course they are. It isn't legal to be carrying one around in hand. That's considered brandishing. I don't get why people have such a hard time understanding the legal and threat level difference between carrying one in a holster or hand.
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
Are you fucking serious?
I think the dash cam footage proves Keith was not threatening any of the cops. None of them were in immediate danger. It looks like they shot him solely because he would not drop the gun he did or did not have.
Me too. I'm guessing they never clearly identify themselves as cops at the beginning of the encounter?
Why would I want black friends?
I now want to know what they edited.
Me too. I'm guessing they never clearly identify themselves as cops at the beginning of the encounter?
I think he's showing intent to use the weapon, by not dropping it. I mean, again, maybe he wasn't going to do anything. But as long as you keep a weapon, it's possible you're planning to use it. Also, I'm just relying on what I heard on the news: I heard an expert state that tests have indicated officers can't react fast enough to disable someone, if they wait for them to raise the weapon? But who knows, that could be wrong?
Trash human being.
I can't see it. It's a very brief shot on a low res camera.This isn't up for debate anymore. He had a gun in his hand. You can clearly see a gun in his hand in the body cam video if you pause it around 18 seconds.
Someone just felt like shooting someone and that's what they did.They shot him for fucking nothing. Over fucking nothing.
Fucking shameful
One of the most blatantly racist posts I have seen on GAF. It's really weird that he was posting in poligaf just today talking shit about Trump. Guess you never know about people, but there are some issues that will push them over the edge. For them it was saying bad things about cops.
...yeah, she planned this whole thing /s
You think she thought they wouldn't search and find the gun after they killed/arrested him?
yep sure this is exactly what she wanted.
I can't believe you had the balls to post this after we find out the cops lied
Not looking good for this guy considering he had a gun, and what we know of the police transcript.
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
Not looking good for this guy considering he had a gun, and what we know of the police transcript.
In the heat of the moment, that seems to be quite a stretch. If someone is pointing a gun at a family member I imagine your first thought isn't how to frame their death to increase anti-police sentiment. I would imagine most people want to figure out how to deescalate the situation instead.
If she knew about the gun, despite what she said on camera, the most I would be willing to go with is that she was trying to lower the intensity of the situation and get the officers to back off some. In the end though, I can very well imagine she simply didn't know, especially being a small ankle holster weapon that is easy to hide. It could even be something he kept hidden more in his vehicle and unseen at home. For all we know, he could have purchased it that day and she wasn't aware yet.
Not looking good for this guy considering he had a gun, and what we know of the police transcript.
Or she lied knowing that it would feed into the anti cop mentality and people would believe it with no evidence?
Most are viewed as heroes and most cops look like him.
To bash cops, would be slander on his way of life/thinking.