ShockingAlberto said:Did they stick Wii Fit in to their condescending little "Non-Gaming Monthly" thing they did with Endless Ocean?
Luckyman said:Infamous must have gone 2009 if not shown at E3.
Pureauthor said:For comparison's sake, how did you find FFTA for GBA?
Paracelsus said:Fixed.
charlequin said:
Tadale said:I'm guessing Wii Sports, Wii Play, and Wii Fit. I'm pretty sure that's all they need at this point.
jmdajr said:edit: ebgames still lists pilot wings. And what ever happened to that wii music game with the orchestra?
Wii Music will propably be one of Nintendo's big Fall titles. They just want to keep the attention on Wii Fit for now so there's no need to release new information about the game right now.jmdajr said:but mario baseball?
edit: ebgames still lists pilot wings. And what ever happened to that wii music game with the orchestra?
Blu_LED said:Is this magazine worth getting? Should I get this one for Game Informer?
skip said:re: Infamous preview...I honestly don't know what's up with that -- not my department. but historically, if we have assets & information about a game people are interested in, we don't intentionally hold it back. I imagine the logjam is somewhere at Sony.
JDSN said:So the game is set in the middle east while ignoring the war, people can get their arab-killing fun without directly facing the moral ambiguity of current world issues.
OldJadedGamer said:So Skip, what's up with the MGS4 review? OPM got review code months ago, Shane was flown to Japan to see it, you promised it last month, and other mags are getting their reviews out. What was the hold up?
daCuk said:without the obnoxious comments.
pgtl_10 said:Hating on Dubai is the new fad in America. Hopefully we get to see a realistic view of Dubai including that ski slope in the mall.
skip said:...stipulations
Opus Angelorum said:Very restrictive I assume?
skip said:vaguely and inappropriately so.
Opus Angelorum said:Seems counter-productive on their part, if it makes for a more thorough review then the delay is welcome.
Opiate said:Thank god Medal of Honor is being made grittier and more realistic.
charlequin said:
Yeah, she really liked Soma Bringer.Bebpo said:Yeah, but keep in mind that Aeana likes everything. I take her posts with a grain of salt.
Bebpo said:Yeah, but keep in mind that Aeana likes everything. I take her posts with a grain of salt.
skip said:we didn't like the stipulations set forth in Konami's NDA, so we bumped the official review to next month. we'll blog about it when the time comes.
OldJadedGamer said:I'm going to take a wild guess and say that the stipulation was that it receives a 9.5 or it doesn't get printed. Well, if you guys are holding your ground on a big title like this... this just bumped my respect points up for the mag.
We all know that Shane is going to give it a 10/A+, that's a given but I'm interested to see what the other two guys give the game if you are holding it back.
HK-47 said:something something tag lol
OldJadedGamer said:I'm going to take a wild guess and say that the stipulation was that it receives a 9.5 or it doesn't get printed. Well, if you guys are holding your ground on a big title like this... this just bumped my respect points up for the mag.
Hammer24 said:Oh Google ads... :lol
OldJadedGamer said:I'm going to take a wild guess and say that the stipulation was that it receives a 9.5 or it doesn't get printed.
Ashhong said:what a stupid thing to guess.
Euphor!a said:It isn't like it is unheard of. I've read somewhere that some publishers say you can't publish a review for their game until xx/xx/xx unless you give it a certain score.
SolidSnakex said:If you've seen the other reviews you know Konami has put in rules about how much you can talk about specific parts of the game so that people won't be spoiled. I guess by EGM holding out for a month that means the game will be out and they'll be able to talk about it without those rules in place.
Blu_LED said:Is this magazine worth getting? Should I get this one for Game Informer?
LegendofJoe said:I'm going to get off on the soap box for a bit, but it seems to me that a lot of people still don't understand the Wii and feel threatened by it. I want to try and allay those fears.
I think the problem a lot of people have with the Wii is the fact that they don't understand the underlying strategy behind it. Nintendo is seeking to expand the definition of how the public at large views video games. I think their long term goal is to get people to view video games as digital interactive entertainment, and not simply as games that cater to younger people. In my opinion this signifies a maturing of the industry. There are many different types of movies, music, and books that all cater towards different audiences. Some movies cater to families and children, while others cater towards teenagers and young adults. Some music genres cater to older people, while other music caters towards middle aged people. There is nothing strange or alarming about this trend, it is simply a natural evolution.
Games you enjoy will not go away, in fact this trend will strengthen and energize the industry in the long term by bringing video games into the mainstream and getting the public at large to accept them as a viable form of entertainment no different from television or movies.
OldJadedGamer said:Sounds like it's going a little deeper then just talking about story points. Strange to hold up a review of such a hyped up game over that.
Euphor!a said:It isn't like it is unheard of. I've read somewhere that some publishers say you can't publish a review for their game until xx/xx/xx unless you give it a certain score.
Ashhong said:is there proof of this? thats pretty fucking ridiculous if true. i refuse to believe any publication would abide by that rule, and therefore the publisher wouldn't do it
My impression is that none of the reviews before the game comes out is allowed to talk about the game past the Act 1. Which I agree doesn't make for much of a review, and would sound more like a tease/preview. This obviously is not a problem for internet outlets (they publish reviews on day and date with games' release all the time) but it is for print.SolidSnakex said:It's not just the story, they don't seem to really want you going into detail about the locations outside of the initial Middle East location.
LegendofJoe said:I'm going to get off on the soap box for a bit, but it seems to me that a lot of people still don't understand the Wii and feel threatened by it. I want to try and allay those fears.
I think the problem a lot of people have with the Wii is the fact that they don't understand the underlying strategy behind it. Nintendo is seeking to expand the definition of how the public at large views video games. I think their long term goal is to get people to view video games as digital interactive entertainment, and not simply as games that cater to younger people. In my opinion this signifies a maturing of the industry. There are many different types of movies, music, and books that all cater towards different audiences. Some movies cater to families and children, while others cater towards teenagers and young adults. Some music genres cater to older people, while other music caters towards middle aged people. There is nothing strange or alarming about this trend, it is simply a natural evolution.
Games you enjoy will not go away, in fact this trend will strengthen and energize the industry in the long term by bringing video games into the mainstream and getting the public at large to accept them as a viable form of entertainment no different from television or movies.