Yes, it is selfish to want a game to be changed to cater to you, but that's what every consumer is. Every consumer wants things to be best for them.
With that being said, the content we're talking about is optional. It seems reasonable to say that the removal of optional content is a bad trade for people who wanted it there, in terms of how much value is gained by the people who don't want it there.
Optional content is engaged with as a matter of desire, and is at worst a negative tinge at the periphery of the experience for those who don't want it there. The removal of it serves to get rid of that tinge, but also completely guts a positive experience that someone who wants it there would actively engage with.
There's a disproportionate trade happening in terms of which party is gaining and losing value in the game.
--
Also, it's fine to be happy about it. It's also fine to not be happy about it. Where I think a line is crossed is when you express your opinion in a way that attempts to shame people that have a different opinion.
RM8, I recognize that people attempt to call you prude because of your distaste for fanservice, and that's shitty. But look at the volume of that kind of talk that happened near the beginning of this thread, where people were being called weirdos/insane/creeps/pervs/gamergaters, etc, for having the opposite opinion. Clearly you must recognize the opposite is happening just as much, and is just as shitty.
I'd also like to thank Steve Youngblood for quelling those posts somewhat by calling it out.