JoshuaJSlone
Member
No. Setting it in the stone age would be fresh.lockii said:Taking the series back to WWII is the stupidest fucking thing I have EVER witnessed. COD4 sells gangbusters and they're taking the game back to the stone age?
No. Setting it in the stone age would be fresh.lockii said:Taking the series back to WWII is the stupidest fucking thing I have EVER witnessed. COD4 sells gangbusters and they're taking the game back to the stone age?
Proelite said:and the Japanese army responded with honor by doing the same.
Also, CoD4 was one of the few FPSs that proved successful in Japan. How well do you think one where they have to kill their grandfathers will do?
No. Setting it in the stone age would be fresh.
Zenith said:Pacific theatre is the most boring of all theatres.
Also, CoD4 was one of the few FPSs that proved successful in Japan. How well do you think one where they have to kill their grandfathers will do?
DiddyBop said:all the ppl complaining know damn well that they will fall into the hype like tools when the game is released and most of you will end up purchasing CoD5. you guys are saying the game is crap before its even released? obviously activision and the developers know they have big shoes to fill; the reason cod4 sold so much was because of excellent word of mouth and AAA reviews across the board. they are obviously not going to fuck this up.
ksamedi said:For the people complaining about COD5 being a WW2 shooter despite sales of COD4. Isn't it obvious that COD5 began development way before COD4 even released? I'm sure COD6 and later iterations will be modern day shooters.
neonvision said:But of course they knew IW was working on long before COD4 was released. They probably just didn't think it would have been nearly as successful as it was.
Relix said:Must feel bad to be all lonely in your world right?
I thought it sold 10 million?Rated-Rsuperstar said:Just because 8 million people have bought into a shitty singleplayer campaign, doesn't make me feel bad.
cw_sasuke said:I expect big numbers on wii - since there is NO competition
Perhaps you should try one of those Earthling women. What they lack in extra tentacles they make up for in sheer vagina.Bigmac573 said:Personally, Im sick of fucking Gears style aliens.
You're right. There has never been a good shooter from a company other than Infinity Ward. Why even bother?Demigod Mac said:not Infinity Ward?
Fail.
stuminus3 said:Perhaps you should try one of those Earthling women. What they lack in extra tentacles they make up for in sheer vagina.
Is it just me, or are these charts a bad comparison?JoshuaJSlone said:
versus
I didn't buy Call of Duty 3. From the sales it looks like a lot of other people skipped it as well.DiddyBop said:all the ppl complaining know damn well that they will fall into the hype like tools when the game is released and most of you will end up purchasing CoD5. you guys are saying the game is crap before its even released? obviously activision and the developers know they have big shoes to fill; the reason cod4 sold so much was because of excellent word of mouth and AAA reviews across the board. they are obviously not going to fuck this up.
Never been a good Call of Duty from anyone other than Infinity Ward.No Means Nomad said:You're right. There has never been a good shooter from a company other than Infinity Ward. Why even bother?
We have our roots in the Quake 3 technology much like I imagine the Source engine has its roots in Quake 1. In other words, if you throw out all the rendering, animation, multiprocessor support, AI, scripting, and lots of other stuff then sure, we have roots in Quake 3.brain_stew said:COD4's engine still has its roots in Quake 3 technology, so I don't see why this is impossible or anything. It's not going to have all the next gen effects, but it running on the same basic engine should make development a whole lot easier for Treyarch.
Bobby1234SI said:PlayTM magazine also stats that Call of Duty 5 is set in the Pacific part of WWII.
Y2Kev said:why does anyone care? COD4's no SP beast.
Y2Kev said:Everybody should stop dogging Treyarch. They may not have the greatest track record and COD3 wasn't amazing, but they did the entire project on like six platforms in less than a year. That's very impressive considering the quality of game they put out (still like a C+/B- game, I guess).
Plus, what exactly are you all hemming and hawing about regarding Infinity Ward's ability to create a solid single player campaign? As long as they don't ruin the multiplayer-- and they might, based on what we see so far-- why does anyone care? COD4's no SP beast.
I'll give it a shot. Boo on the setting.
HondaF1Fanatic said:I would like a CoD set in Korea, Vietnam, or Afghanistan in the 80s as well. I don't think WWII or "Modern Warfare" are the only possibilities here.
legend166 said:CoD 4 engine running on Wii?
Say whaaaat?
Of course it's going to be an obvious downgrade, that's a good achievement, no?
ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:The Pacific theatre is in no way boring, Medal of Honor: Rising Sun may have left a bad taste in peoples mouths but yeah, there where some epic battles againt the Japanese who where brutally sadistic fucks.
Wouldnt mind a PNG level with Aus soldiers in it, my grandfather was there so it might actually mean something, have heard a few of his story's and the Japs are barbaric so killin a few hundred would be sweet..
Salazar said:Not as much as this post. Videogames as imaginative retribution for wartime atrocity on either side is just sad.