I hate to admit it because I think they're both lunatics, but I have two good friends who are both very much on the same page as Heavy.
I hope he's wrong, but he may not be in as small a minority as I'd like to believe.
Game Informer info, courtesy of Go Nintendo.
On this note they really need, and I mean NEED to highlight which stages have hidden exits this time like SMW itself.
Eh, the best selling titles have and continue to be the fun, gamey-type games (I can't believe I have to actually clarify this distinction) so I think he's pretty far off-base there.
On this note they really need, and I mean NEED to highlight which stages have hidden exits this time like SMW itself.
I am freaking out right now.
Ummm, or you can just get the issue in the iPad like I said over a page ago. You guys are too busy arguing to actually see the real newsGame Informer info, courtesy of Go Nintendo.
Ummm, or you can just get the issue in the iPad like I said over a page ago. You guys are too busy arguing to actually see the real news
Like I've been playing Guild Wars 2 several hours a day since it came out. It blows my mind people would use that time to play a platformer when there's incredible games like this available to you. Except on like a cell phone when you're out of the house. It would feel like a complete waste of time. No goals, nothing to strive for except beating your score or what have you. Platformers are just a really bad, archaic, boring genre imo.
Ummm, or you can just get the issue in the iPad like I said over a page ago. You guys are too busy arguing to actually see the real news
It looks like the New! series has finally caught up to Super Mario World.
Maybe it's time to drop the moniker, since its entire existence is based on lifting certain elements from old Mario games and, well, not really doing anything "new". The nostalgia well is dry at this point.
That being said, SMW is my favorite 2D Mario, so hype is slowing increasing for NSMB U.
I am SUPER hyped right now. Finally some good variety.
This is without doubt, one of the stupidest things I have ever read. Ah man, it made me laugh.it's just pure gameplay which isn't even good imo.
So... giving you the same tropes as the games that "don't have variety", but giving the tropes goofy names, solves the problem... If only Nintendo knew it was this easy they'd have done it with NSMB2.
Plains, Water World, Ice World, Desert World, Forest World, Sky World = awful.
Acorn Plains, Sparkling Waters, Frosted Glacier, Layer Cake Desert, Forest of Illusion, Sky world = finally more variety!
This is the most devastating quote I've ever seen on NeoGAF. Forget "Square Enix Just Shot Themselves In The Foot" or the nonsense spewed in the Uncharted 8/10 thread. This damning condemnation of a game for being "pure gameplay" is the spawn of a gaming mindset I do not ever wish to understand.
This is without doubt, one of the stupidest things I have ever read. Ah man, it made me laugh.
Even more telling to me is the insinuation that 2D platform games are "wasting time"... implying his preferred videogame is not. The self-importance is amazing. It's like, get the fuck over yourself, know what I mean?
Wow, this sounds great. Glad I skipped out on NSMB2 for this.
Game Informer info, courtesy of Go Nintendo.
Izuka?!
Lol woops, Tezuka. The hype has affected my brain.
WELL TOO LATE, NOW IIZUKA TOOK OVER NSMB U! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!
Because... Nintendo.I'm late but the art in the magazine.. Those assets.. Is there a reason those are not the game assets ? Cause the WiiU could definitely handle that... Would be impressive at least.
Blue eyesSuper Mario Generations: Fall 2014
I'd buy it.
Can someone make me an avatar out of this? It's beautiful :lol
Blue eyes
Because... Nintendo.
Super Mario Generations: Fall 2014
I'd buy it.
Holy crap, did NOT expect that lol. Just giving my opinion, it's probably my least liked genre outside of ultra casual garb, for the aforementioned reasons.
First of all, I appreciate such a reasonable and well-thought out reply. I can totally see where you're coming from as well. For me, being skilled at something like that is not rewarding. I'd feel no satisfaction from being able to run through a hard level fast without dying, especially in a single-player game. Feels like a complete waste of time playing these games with ZERO story, the most basic of characters, little to no dialogue, just brutal. Even if it had all those aspects, I feel the gameplay is an utter bore. Just going from left to right, jumping, trial & error, random puzzles, not my thing. No customization, no loot, not much strategy, no planning, no atmosphere, no feeling of getting sucked into the world.
I'm REALLY surprised that opinion is controversial. There's no way I'm in a tiny minority with disliking this genre as these responses seem to imply. I'm feeling kinda blind-sided...
Like I've been playing Guild Wars 2 several hours a day since it came out. It blows my mind people would use that time to play a platformer when there's incredible games like this available to you. Except on like a cell phone when you're out of the house. It would feel like a complete waste of time. No goals, nothing to strive for except beating your score or what have you. Platformers are just a really bad, archaic, boring genre imo.
I'm the one who should come to terms with it? Look at those replies and say that again.
This is a Game Informer cover thread, not just about platformers. I figured there might be something more inside, a hint or previews of what else was in this month's mag, so I clicked it then saw that post and replied. Had no idea it would lead to that barrage.
GW2
Mass Effect
Deus Ex HR
Diablo 3 if it wasn't awful
Sleeping Dogs
Far Cry 3
Borderlands 2
That's my style. Can't imagine putting any significant time into a platformer when these types of games are out there. No way I'm in a minority with that opinion.
You can go even further with this type of thinking... we're all going to die anyway so why go to work and be constructive when it's all for nothing.
You're implying that platforming more "gamey" than other genres, which isn't true. Just because they lack story, atmosphere, memorable characters and such and mainly rely on gameplay doesn't mean they're more 'gamey' than other genres. Other genres can have just as much gameplay, much more in fact with much deeper mechanics, along with all those narrative aspects mentioned above. That's why I feel like it's a waste of time.
Sports games are a different beast altogether because they have such a strong connection to the real world. And no, I don't play puzzle or racing games.
A good story and characters cannot HURT any individual game. It could only improve it. This is an unobjectionable truth. You can have both. Why settle for less?
For example, if Transformers was remade with all the action scenes and special effects equal but it had a better plot behind it, higher quality dialogue, it would be a better film, despite the core aspects of the movie (the action and SFX) being the same -- this can't be denied.
Hobby? We're talking about a specific genre here. Don't put words in my mouth. That's like saying when we crap on Kinect and other super casual games we're mocking a hobby.
That wasn't the initial post that started it.
So have I just been not paying attention?
When did Dennis2K4 become Dennis?
Dude, wtf. Like, seriously.
Platformers have offered some of the best gameplay in the industries history. I cannot believe you actually cant comprehend how people would love the platforming genre. Yes, open world games are fun. Yea, FPS are fun. Sure, fighting games are fun. But they don't invalidate the platforming genre anymore than platformers invalidate them.
Play them on your cell phone indeed, lol. Wow.
Game Informer info, courtesy of Go Nintendo. Awesome sauce evolved SMW maps, rush mode and unique levels.
He was only producer of Generations
HE MADE SHADOW THE HEDGEHOG THOUGH
OHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Who's the Mario equivalent of Shadow? Wario?
I'm all for another Wario game. 3D, 2D, handheld, console, good, bad. Let Iizuka at it.