-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
GT5 Demo/Forza 2 comparison (56K and trolls go back to Drivers Ed)
- Thread starter Sho Nuff
- Start date
- Status
Joust Williams
Member
How does a thread comparing graphics in a 5 month old sim game to a game not coming out for 12 months get so many posts?
I almost want to throw my PS3 off a cliff just to see some people cry.
I almost want to throw my PS3 off a cliff just to see some people cry.
user friendly
Member
acabado said:
Apocryphon
Member
Concept17 said:In any case, NFSS will be more fun than either.
It's subjective. They're very different.
mysticstylez
Banned
So if you play in 1st person view Forza 2 looks better with it's courses. If you play in anything but 1st person view GT5's car models make it look better.
Pizza Luigi
Member
It's not like GT5 > Forza 2 in graphics or other way around, the areas do just look plain different
szaromir said:
I HOPE that you're joking... I really do... Because that is the most rediculous comment I've seen here in weeks, and that includes stuff in the latest NPD thread...
People are in for a rude awakening when going with the "Forza 2's physics are much better than GT4's, thus GT5's gameplay is worse"... The physics system seems to have been revamped drastically...
I love this pic :lol ... Looks like a spectator threw a bucket of cement at the car...
user friendly
Member
Dante said:
Different year/make.
SolidSnakex
Member
user friendly said:
Diablohead
Member
Is that a row of 2d people on the right of the bridge in the gt5p demo shot?
The bridge itself looks much better in gt5p, but what about the rest of the track
The bridge itself looks much better in gt5p, but what about the rest of the track
Great that this thread is without doubt in GT5's favor so I can't be accused for being a whining fanboy for saying this:
Game comparison threads, especially between competing exclusives, should be banned from NeoGaf as they never bring anything good.
Big piles of steamy poo attracting flies, that's what these threads are.
Game comparison threads, especially between competing exclusives, should be banned from NeoGaf as they never bring anything good.
Big piles of steamy poo attracting flies, that's what these threads are.
I should know, I'm attracted to them and have made a couple in the past ^.^
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
Sho-Nuff, you are in the position to answer this. Is it really OK to have both consoles on a TV with same color settings for both. Do they actually have the same exact color/brightness output? Try just showing an identical static picture on both - do they actually look the same or does PS3 require different color settings on a TV compared to X360?
GT5 Prologue is coming very soon I think, and that will be a (small) full game in it's own right.Joust Williams said:
SolidSnakex
Member
VonGak! said:
Yep, there was an interview with some professional driver after GT4 was released who said they nailed every turn and bump in their version of the Nurburgring with the exception of one part (he didn't say what the was).
Apocryphon
Member
spwolf said:
Next you [purists] get to tear the ProStreet demo to shreds. It's with MS at the mo.
Majik said:
Listen, this is a discussion about daddy racing sim games... Not a "scene" racer... Nobody giving that pic you threw up before of prostreet a second look should've told you that...
Anyways, I'm really warming up to white on the Evo X... If it's a nice pearl, I may give that more though... Then again, that's if I go Evo again this time instead of STI... I love the way the STI looks and the interior... Tough decisions...
szaromir said:
There's a really huge difference between slowly accellerating around town, and even on a highway, and knowing how your car is going to react when your rear wheels break the gripping point, and you use the throttle to push through the corner.
There is a big difference between knowing how to slow down for a turn coming off a highway, and slowing down to hit an apex, and knowing how much throttle to use to come out of the apex, and not going overboard to maintain traction, or knowing how to keep the car under control once the traction threshold is passed.
Your example, sir, is a failure.
Trax416 said:
It sure does. Oh wait.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8313674&postcount=255
Panajev2001a
GAF's Pleasant Genius
The lighting GT is using is making the scenery look like, well overexposed: well, to make myself clear, look at the blu skies in these two pictures (GT and then Forza)...
Can this result be caused by the different time of day and thus sun light intensity and height in the sky ?
Can this result be caused by the different time of day and thus sun light intensity and height in the sky ?
Diablohead
Member
Just a shame that it's like one of the only areas of the track that looks better in gt5pjett said:
True, it's like going from a beta to final, but the time gap between both would make forza like a year and a half old by then?J-Rzez said:
user friendly
Member
jett said:
huminahuminahumina
I beg to differTrax416 said:
You can see that the tracks in GT by far ar more detailed with each little detail, there's no difference in texture resolution and GT5 goes for realism.
Not forgetting this straight comparison:
acabado said:
I do not know who made up that GT games have drape tracks. GT4 had some lookers which if not better were at least on pair with the top of the competition.
Just take a look at the Nürb, Grand Canyon, Autumn, Le Mans and Cathedral Rock tracks.
Anyone denying this are either doing PR or haven't touched GT4, perhaps both.
bad memory is also a possibility
HocusPocus
Member
Are there any estimates to how much larger the GT series development team is compared to Turn-10? You have to take that into account, as the little graphical details seem to have more attention paid to them in GT5.
BrokenSymmetry
Member
RSP said:
I agree with this sentiment. To me there are many issues much, much more important in a racing game than the graphics of cars and environment:
- Driving and physics model. Forza 2 was by far the best I have ever experienced in this respect.
- Leaderboards and tournaments, both in-game and available over the web. Again, Forza 2 has done this better than any game ever before.
- Other community features like car clubs, garages that can be visited by other players, user-created leagues and tournaments. Here Forza 2 has some way to go yet.
In my opinion, a racing game's longevity is completely determined by its community support, so where is Polyphony's Che?
EDIT: Sorry about the DP
Dunno if it's just time.
I mean just look at what Naughty dog has been able to do in two years with a team of 80 guys/gals and a budget of $20.
Talent and experience has a lot to say, the PD guys live for GT and all the old guys from the first games are still there plus the have a huge data-base filled with info gathered in the past.
They must pretty much have nailed an efficient work procedure by now, something which can't be bought for money.
I'd say this is also the reason why the GTA games keep beating the competition.
EDIT:
Best car physics ever!
HocusPocus said:
Dunno if it's just time.
I mean just look at what Naughty dog has been able to do in two years with a team of 80 guys/gals and a budget of $20.
Talent and experience has a lot to say, the PD guys live for GT and all the old guys from the first games are still there plus the have a huge data-base filled with info gathered in the past.
They must pretty much have nailed an efficient work procedure by now, something which can't be bought for money.
I'd say this is also the reason why the GTA games keep beating the competition.
EDIT:
Tieno said:
Best car physics ever!
Joust Williams
Member
Yeah...I think I'll cross GT off my "buy" list. If this is what the community is like, there's not much point.
Opus Angelorum
Member
Joust Williams said:
The sad truth is exposed
- Status