Kacho
Member
Can someone explain to me how Smash Bros. ripped off Fighters Megamix?
I thought people were joking about that. If they're seriously comparing the two, then yeah...I need an explanation as well.
Can someone explain to me how Smash Bros. ripped off Fighters Megamix?
Whether Smash will actually be able to compete with PSASBR is another question entirely.
Why do you think that? I think Sony is simply recognizing Smash's popularity and realizing that a mascot fighter is something that players want and will buy. I really don't think the intention of PS All-Stars is to take sales away from SSB, nor do I think it will.It's obviously Sony's intention to take a big ol' bite out of SSB's popularity, but for them to actually succeed... that would be a surprise. To put it lightly.
Kamiya should be thanking Sony. Smash is getting more advertisement from this and it will be more hyped as it has been set as a direct competitor to this game.
Whether Smash will actually be able to compete with PSASBR is another question entirely.
Wait.. Smash has to compete with PSASBR, and not the other way around?
You know that Smash ripped off the arcade game made by Namco? the game name is "The Outfoxies"....Youtube link!
yea but the catch here is that, the ones who worked on this game worked on SSB.
Why do you think that? I think Sony is simply recognizing Smash's popularity and realizing that a mascot fighter is something that players want and will buy. I really don't think the intention of PS All-Stars is to take sales away from SSB, nor do I think it will.
It will definitely take away sales from SSB., if you think about it SSB. was the only worthwhile game in the genre, now that Sony made their version, Sony fans who used to play SSB. for the simple mechanic will not buy SSB. because they have their own version and their will be alot of people changing their preference, it's all because of console wars.
I don't think that's true at all.
IF you like Smash, you'll continue to buy Smash.
You just have another game in the market to play.
More options is never a bad thing.
He is absolutely correct, Sony ripped off Nintendo, nothing new though since Sony always does that on a technical level now they do it on a software level as well with Sony Smash Bros.
Oh and i would love P-100 characters in The news Smash bros, P-100 alone has more memorable characters then any Sony character and it is a new IP.
I thought people were joking about that. If they're seriously comparing the two, then yeah...I need an explanation as well.
wowowow...that looks crazy fun to play *_*
And about the "ripping off" thing, it's just about the "platforming gameplay" or the "platform mascottes" use as characters?
Or the mix of them?
Because it seems so weird that there seems to be just 2 games about it, I'm sure there are more out there, maybe limited to just one franchise (ala Red Hot Rumble).
Yeah I love the intricate plot to P-100. I was especially blown away by the twist that the events in P-100 actually take place at the same time as the events of P-101: Bayonetta gets a haircut. I fell in love with the characters, I really did.
Not sure if dissing P-100 is serious :/
Whats the difference between every fighting game ever? Characters, stages, mechanics.
What's the differences between All Stars and Smash Bros? Sony vs. Nintendo.
Can someone explain to me how Smash Bros. ripped off Fighters Megamix?
We can't. It's not a legitimate question and there's no legitimate answer because it's a statement that doesn't really make any sense.
Why do you think that? I think Sony is simply recognizing Smash's popularity and realizing that a mascot fighter is something that players want and will buy. I really don't think the intention of PS All-Stars is to take sales away from SSB, nor do I think it will.
The big thing here is that the idea is a "mascot beat em up" from a first party company's respective IPs or historically associated IPs
In that sense, it is pretty blatant where the inspiration came from (Smash Bros) and to suggest otherwise is fully and wholly disingenuous on any person's part. Its ridiculous seeing some of the round-about defensiveness that is coming from it...it was clearly inspired by Smash Bros' precedent. In that sense, Kamiya is correct.
The issue on one side is that (some of the) more Sony rooted fans are refusing to acknowledge where the obvious inspiration originated from (Smash Bros) and the issue on the other side is (some of the) more Nintendo rooted fans cannot seem to understand the game might play entirely differently the way Dead or Alive and Tekken are different. More fighters like this is never a bad idea. This is the video game industry, and ideas are "taken" all the time. Or are we going to start blasting Nintendo for copying Sony's "clicky" sticks?
Kamiya should be thanking Sony. Smash is getting more advertisement from this and it will be more hyped as it has been set as a direct competitor to this game.
Whether Smash will actually be able to compete with PSASBR is another question entirely.
Most games are derivative of another game these days. We've been through how many console generations? I mean shit, Super Mario Brothers was derivative of a game like The Great Gianna Sisters, but you don't see many people complaining about that.
This is a joke, right?
That should have been obvious, come on.
This is a joke, right?
Huh? Kamiya has nothing to do with Smash Bros. Why should he even care?
Oh, now SSB4 has to compete with PASBR? That's funny. This thread continues to deliver.
I think the reality is just that 'mascot fighter' describes the draw of SSB in the first place. That's what SSB is, regardless of whether or not it was the first to do it.See. It has quickly dominated the vernacular.
Dude you're a hero. Heroes are supposed to be literate and aware. Did you not watch Drive?
Drive was a great movie.
Drive was a great movie.
I think the reality is just that 'mascot fighter' describes the draw of SSB in the first place. That's what SSB is, regardless of whether or not it was the first to do it.
What would you rather people say, "A game like SSB, you know with Mario and stuff but with different people this time for Sony."?
I like mascot fighter better for SSB and PS-All Stars :crossarms:Crossover. The Term is "Crossover". It has existed for a very long time and is a perfect word to describe these games.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fighting_games#Crossover
Agreed.
Huh? Kamiya has nothing to do with Smash Bros. Why should he even care?
Yes Hero, it certainly doesOh, now SSB4 has to compete with PASBR? That's funny. This thread continues to deliver.
I met all sort of people, this thing doesn't apply to me of course because I iwll buy PSASBR just to wait for SSB4....but alot of people love to play the loyalty game.....
Agreed.Yes Hero, it certainly does
Why do people keep using the term "rip off" in regards to this? To me it naturally has negative connontations involved with it that might rile people up?
Blizzard defense force isn't the same. I think it's the lack of genuine fear.Just like World of Warcraft has to compete with all those other MMORPGs.
Agreed.
It looks almost identical. If you showed someone that hadn't played either game a screen of each, they'd think it was the same game. All it looks like is that they came up with another rule set to go along with stock, timed and coin grab from ssb. Even the special moves are done in the exact same fashion. It's a rip-off and i can't believe they weren't too embarrassed to go through with it. It may as well be from Gameloft.
What about lining up pics of games like doa, tekken and virtua fighter?
I like mascot fighter better for SSB and PS-All Stars :crossarms:
It better describes something like Mario fighting Luigi.
Although I guess PS All-Stars would arguably make more sense being called a crossover fighting game, with that leaked roster.
Those look vastly different from each other other than it's similar visual style. IF you understood fighting games, you'd clearly see that.
Those look vastly different from each other other than it's similar visual style. IF you understood fighting games, you'd clearly see that.
Blizzard defense force isn't the same. I think it's the lack of genuine fear.
That's my point. And is the issue I'm having with this. I've played one and seen the gameplay of the other, and other than being in the crossover multiplayer genre, I'm not seeing what makes people call this a rip off.
It looks almost identical. If you showed someone that hadn't played either game a screen of each, they'd think it was the same game. All it looks like is that they came up with another rule set to go along with stock, timed and coin grab from ssb. Even the special moves are done in the exact same fashion. It's a rip-off and i can't believe they weren't too embarrassed to go through with it. It may as well be from Gameloft.
btw. I doesn't "feel" like SSB