Those developers are probably B-tier anyway. And will close down in 2 years max.
Keep dreaming
Those developers are probably B-tier anyway. And will close down in 2 years max.
In this thread: Butthurt unreasonable Nintendo fans act unreasonable and butthurt.
Oh boy. Lowest common denominator content, here we come. Good thing we still have first party developers.
That Wii U quote is really weird. Most devs have said for a while it's really easy to work with, haven't they?
"Multiple developers also intend to launch software for an unannounced platform next year."
Vita 2 ?
Pfft. They can dominate MS and Sony on their 1st party alone.
Ah, i see. Yeah, it could look like it is about the same developer who said both things.You're right. I've misread, I thought that the one lamented about moving innovating games to Wii U was the same who said it was too complex. But for my defense, english is not my native language.
The PS360 configuration is what I was talking about. The Wii U ports won't have much differences than the PS360/NextBox/PS4 versions. What I'm talking about is nothing new.Funny, I thought third parties didn't support Wii that much.
In this thread: GAF members respond to shitty IGN article.
Banking on the success of the Wii, apparently. Wii U.N64 and GameCube say hello.
Barring lightning striking twice with the casual audience with Wii U, they are going to need to reverse the trend of getting poor third party support on their home consoles. If they aren't making that a high priority item, then I'm not sure what they are doing.
Those developers are probably B-tier anyway. And will close down in 2 years max.
It's clearly about the controller and how to go about using it. They could be developing a game that just makes no real sense to throw something pointless onto the controller.
I highly doubt it's about the hardware inside the box. They are probably looking at it in terms of "power" similar to that of the 360/ps3 that we are hearing about and then going, So that tablet/controller thingy, Um are we going to do anything with it? As they are porting their games across.
I imagine first party and even third party exclusive titles will make use of the controller correctly (hopefully). Straight ports will probably be a map, stat, select screen, some other thing you probably won't really care about.
Sony does not seem to be ready to launch the PS4 so soon, and since Microsoft is making so much money with the xbox360 and they are not pressured by Sony, I don't think we will see the next consoles in 2013...because if MS were to launch the xbox720 the next Xmas, they would be showing something at E3.
Yeah, which other than the mentioned case of unique tablet controller heavy games is still an idiotic excuse. Slap a menu screen or map on it and call it a day, the controller is the same as the others.
I do understand the issue perfectly with unique games. That being said I never expected much from mostly intellectually bankrupt western devs in that regard anyhow.
Hah every generation devs have their excuses.
n64: lol cartridges
gc: lol mini disks
wii: lol graphics
wii-u: lol too complex
Too complex is the worst yet. I think the truth is developers don't want to compete with Nintendo games.
Multiple developers also intend to launch software for an unannounced platform next year.
"We won't be woking on Wii U due to its complexities. However, we are perfectly fine porting shit over to the PS3 because it's the easiest shit to deal with"
All signs point to having a repeat of last generation with third parties and Nintendo.Just how many times will 3rd parties continue to fuck up? When nintendo beats the shit out of both MS and Sony again, what will they say this time?
PS4 is unannounced. It'll be that.
Too complex is the worst yet. I think the truth is developers don't want to compete with Nintendo games.
And that worked wonders last gen.
This industry really has to grow up.
Hah every generation devs have their excuses.
n64: lol cartridges
gc: lol mini disks
wii: lol graphics
wii-u: lol too complex
Too complex is the worst yet. I think the truth is developers don't want to compete with Nintendo games.
Apple console believe.
But I thought that the whole thing about the Wii U was that it's easy to develop for?
Keep dreaming
Microsoft will still have the edge for low tier devs with stuff like XNA.I thought that Sony chose a much more conventional hardware design after partnering with AMD. If that's the case then why is this still the case?
Wut? I don't think that we're going to see many games developed for all five of those consoles except in the very early beginning of the cycle, and I doubt there "won't be many differences" between Orbis/Durango and Wii U- which seems to be what these devs are saying as well.The PS360 configuration is what I was talking about. The Wii U ports won't have much differences than the PS360/NextBox/PS4 versions.
It's probably "complex" in the same way it would be complex to port a 360/PS3 game to the Vita, as opposed to like... the base product actually being complex to develop for.
Hahaha. Keep telling yourself that at night. A console with minimal third party releases is something only Nintendo fans could be proud of.
Wut? I don't think that we're going to see many games developed for all four of those consoles except in the very early beginning of the cycle, and I doubt there "won't be many differences" between Orbis/Durango and Wii U.
Do you really want me to post a list of the studios that closed this gen?
.Apple console confirmed? =P
Also I'm curious what these devs mean by saying the Wii-U is too complex.
But the thing is, it's not. At all.
I don't get this.
Hah every generation devs have their excuses.
n64: lol cartridges
gc: lol mini disks
wii: lol graphics
wii-u: lol too complex
Too complex is the worst yet. I think the truth is developers don't want to compete with Nintendo games because they see them more as competitors than they see Sony and MS. Sales charts tend to agree.
Well, developers aren't businessmen, and even the people who are have been abysmal at predicting where the industry will be to this point.3rd parties have already picked a winner.
In what sense?
I mean that from the reverse direction to note, not like PS3/360 -> Wii U.
"Multiple developers also intend to launch software for an unannounced platform next year."
Wait... does this mean there's a fourth platform coming or am I misreading it?
It's probably "complex" in the same way it would be complex to port a 360/PS3 game to the Vita, as opposed to like... the base product actually being complex to develop for.