Spyder_Monkey
Banned
It's such a nothing story I'm surprised this thread is still being kept up.
When square announced DQXI for it, which uses Unreal 4. They then pulled the announcement.When was UE4 support confirmed?
I thought that was nothing more than a rumor.
I like the idea of a base console and handled with moderate (say XB1) level hardware, with added SCD units to make your console as powerful as you want. they do have patents for such a device/s and i think it'd be the way to go.
Developers seem to have no problems developing or PC games which vary wildly in power, so I figure it'd be the same thing. Have several preset "performance settings" and depending on your SCDs it detects which performance setting you get.
Whrever it ends up falling on the power spectrum, just know we'll get a new 3D Mario game that looks better than 3D World is hnggggggggggg
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
When square announced DQXI for it, which uses Unreal 4. They then pulled the announcement.
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
And that's Nintendos problem, Sunshine, Galaxy, 3d World, sure they look better end better, but not hugely so, the artstyle used is stopping them.
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
And that's Nintendos problem, Sunshine, Galaxy, 3d World, sure they look better end better, but not hugely so, the artstyle used is stopping them.
And that's Nintendos problem, Sunshine, Galaxy, 3d World, sure they look better end better, but not hugely so, the artstyle used is stopping them.
I want the Mario NX game whatever it is, to be Super Mario 64 -> Galaxy/3Dworld jump, not a Galaxy -> 3D World refinement.
I enjoy how you paint the other side of the argument as overly hopeful and unrealistic while you talk about screenless controllers with integrated game systems and tv dongles
I dunno, have you seen Galaxy running in Dolphin? It looks downright gorgeous, despite being a Wii game. I really don't think art style is the problem.
They just need to make the games higher resolution, but everything else looks mostly fine. The only thing that stood out to me as bad in 3D World was the skybox water textures, the repeating tiles were WAY too obvious for a current-gen game.
Except the nx has vulkan and unreal 4 support that the Wii U didn't.
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
NX will be crushed by the new PS4K
And cost efficient enough for a 2TF+ part for Nintendo like profitability and retail pricing?
What if Nintendo is going to offer a cheap ($250-299) entry-level NX console, on par with XB1 power-wise, AND a 399 premium-console with twice the power and 4k upscaling/output, both sharing the same game library, together with their mobile derivate?
Just sayin...
I'd like that...
You do realize that Nintendo's never been focused on power, right? The reason their systems have *mostly* been more powerful than competitors in the past, neverminding certain aspects they were weaker in, is because of their late launches. And it's not like they blew their competitors clearly out of the water....ever, honestly. Just marginally more capable in a few ways is all.It can't just be "more" powerful than the PS4 and XBOne...that's what the Wii-U did against the PS3 and XB360...It has to be several orders of magnitude more powerful than the PS4 and XBOne.
Think about it like this. The NES could do 64 colors, the SNES did an Order of magnitude more at 65,000+. The SNES+FX(II) could do about 1200-1800 polygons per second, the N64 could do about 100,000-170,000 per second, and the GameCube went a step further at 1.20 Million Polygons per-second.
If Nintendo is Serious, it HAS to be an order of magnitude performance jump much like their past history. Make the NX at the VERY LEAST 10 times more powerful than the Wii-U. Anything less than 7 times more powerful than the PS4 is wasting everybody's time.
Couldnt disagree more, talented people (nintendo) will always utilise new tech in amazing ways, as they have done for years. Mario World blew everything out of the water, OOT did it, Galaxy did it, and they'll do it again.
What if Nintendo is going to offer a cheap ($250-299) entry-level NX console, on par with XB1 power-wise, AND a 399 premium-console with twice the power and 4k upscaling/output, both sharing the same game library, together with their mobile derivate?
Just sayin...
I'd like that...
As far as we know it could even be crushed by the PS4 without K.NX will be crushed by the new PS4K
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
As far as we know it could even be crushed by the PS4 without K.
There is a vine made with SFM that has Meowser dancing, the model is straight out of 3d world, but seeing it with all the fancy PC shaders and stuff makes it look incredibly better than 3d world, and again, it's the same model from the game, so yes, i think they can do way better.
If Nintendo is Serious, it HAS to be an order of magnitude performance jump much like their past history. Make the NX at the VERY LEAST 10 times more powerful than the Wii-U. Anything less than 7 times more powerful than the PS4 is wasting everybody's time.
NX will be crushed by the new PS4K
Floppage is usually mainly a GPU thing, and AMD doesn't seem to have any issues working with ARM CPU cores, so I don't see why not.
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
What if Nintendo is going to offer a cheap ($250-299) entry-level NX console, on par with XB1 power-wise, AND a 399 premium-console with twice the power and 4k upscaling/output, both sharing the same game library, together with their mobile derivate?
Just sayin...
I'd like that...
Not if it ends in the NX Console being expensive as shit.NX needs to support 4K if wants to be relevant in a long run strategy.
Can a new 3d mario game even look noticeably better than 3d world? I mean I honestly think that's the best they can look.
I should hope so, the ps4/xb1 are several years old now.
This is my thought. How could it possibly be less?
I'm expecting it to be slightly below the Xbox One for the sake of keeping costs down.This is my thought. How could it possibly be less?
I'm expecting it to be slightly below the Xbox One for the sake of keeping costs down.
What's the point of "details" when the games can barely make it to 30 fps lmfao. Look at Assassin's Creed. Beautiful game. So much going on..and oh it's a broken game.
Power isn't everything. It's how the power is used.
NX needs to support 4K if wants to be relevant in a long run strategy.
I'm expecting it to be slightly below the Xbox One for the sake of keeping costs down.