I don't read 4chan.
Here are the facts. Druck is very ambitious - if you don't agree, read up on his biography. Amy got fired. With an NDA. He got her job. He steered U4 in a different direction from what Amy would have liked. He steered LOU2 in a different direction from what Charles would have liked.
From all these facts we can predict he will continue being extremely ambitious and after conquering ND will aim for head of Sony or similar. We can predict he will continue to champion the ideals of the grifter Anita (who is not interested in games herself - just in ruining them), of whom he is a self proclaimed fan. He will likely continue favoring being a navel gazing auteur as opposed to creating fun, entertaining experience like the ones before him. ND: No fun allowed.
well you sure spread conspiracies like you do, do you write "cuckman" alot on twitter also?
Oh no, not ambition, how dare a prominent developer have ambition!
yes he is a soy boy, but spreading nonsense FUD that he has some sort of stranglehold over Naughty Dog for the last 15 years or so is still just a silly statement to make and is incredibly incorrect.
Amy Hennig was let go because she couldn't deliver, there was no conspiracy and it's been proven evidently so with the plethora of cancelled projects and dissolved studios since that she has been a part of, with her only actual credit since U3 being Forspoken.
The only reason to blame Druckmann for with anything naughty dog is his game TLOUp2 (which is where I assume all your pent up gamer rage is coming from).
yeah i'm gonna wait and see how it all pans out first and see how his decision making legitimately effects the company since we have literally nothing tangible to go on currently, again Evan Wells was in charge when all that you apparently hated occured unlike your original theory that Neil "Controlled Naughty Dog" he just straight up didn't and he always has had someone above him.