Azure Phoenix
Member
The vast majority of the blame for the Wii U's weak performance is squarely at Nintendo's feet, but the UK's biggest retailers have barely been pushing the hardware at all. The shelf space mentioned in the article is for Nintendo products in general. Go into any supermarket and you will see the Wii U stuff jumbled in with everything else. This does much more harm in terms of consumer confusion, just as it did with the 3DS.
Not to mention that the software actually available in shops that aren't Game Group is poor as anything. The Sainsbury's I shop at regularly has a Wii U top ten that consists of Nintendo Land, NSMBU and Zombi U. There is literally nothing else on the shelf.
That space needs to be used in a much better manner. Is it true that Nintendo usually guide the retailer in this aspect, or do all companies simply leave the retailers to display however they want?
Why would the retailers waste space (and cash buying stock) on a product that isn't selling though? It isn't their responsibility to dedicate valuable floor space on a system which is selling abysmally, the only way it'd make financial sense to do that would be if Nintendo were specifically paying the company for that shelf space.
The store I work at hasn't even been selling any copies of the so-called system sellers (NSMBU, Zombi U) for months and interest in the system is non-existent despite a large area dedicated to the system and a demo station. With conditions like that it is hardly surprising that tiny releases don't get stocked and shelf space is downsized.
Regarding customer confusion, the fact that we still get far too many people buying 3DS titles for their old DS systems and then trying to return them when they don't work is proof enough. Both of Nintendo's current systems have not been marketed anywhere near well enough to distinguish them as entirely new experiences to the mass market.