Up to 200FPS. Says so in the OP.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
NVIDIA releases DOOM PC footage of the game running w/ the Vulkan API - 1080p@60fps
- Thread starter Gattsu25
- Start date
Up to 200FPS. Says so in the OP.
UnrealEck
Member
Video is 1080p@60fps.
Earlier, they showed the game running with a GTX1080 at 120~200 fps
However, this footage was taken with a GTX Titan X which is a less powerful card. They didn't say what the FPS was here so I just went with what the video was encoded at in the thread title. (also, I was just below the thread title limit so couldn't expound there. I quoted nvidia's explanation of the footage in the OP)
Baffling that Bethesda / id didn't show this sort of stuff sooner, particularly to the PC crowd and die-hard old school fans.
They focused a lot on the console versions / controller gameplay and focused on weapons more than the speed of movement and action that I've always felt is Doom along with a sense of dread eerieness and frantic fighting. This footage alone has it all, especially with a mouse wielding player with good fov and enough skill to demonstrate the game nicely. Also a good segment with better enemies and action. Definitely sold me in particular with the last minutes.
Kicking some metal in there at the end when the action kicked off brought a massive smile to my face, thinking this is that Doom feeling.
They focused a lot on the console versions / controller gameplay and focused on weapons more than the speed of movement and action that I've always felt is Doom along with a sense of dread eerieness and frantic fighting. This footage alone has it all, especially with a mouse wielding player with good fov and enough skill to demonstrate the game nicely. Also a good segment with better enemies and action. Definitely sold me in particular with the last minutes.
Kicking some metal in there at the end when the action kicked off brought a massive smile to my face, thinking this is that Doom feeling.
It won't play like this, no matter how many frames per second it gets on console.
200 fps was peak. It was mostly running 120fps+ in the demo.
It's notable better than the Titan X. 1070 might even be close to it; it is faster
Agree. It makes no sense to me why id or Bethesda didn't show this kind of footage before, it looks so much better.
There's still a lot of dead time in that first arena where the player is just running around waiting for enemies, but I guess that's just the difficulty setting and the player being good enough to kill enemies before they swarm them.
sunshine and gasoline
Banned
Looks much better than all the prior footage I saw of this game. Still won't get the game anytime soon but that is mainly because I have a relatively weak computer at the moment. Probably won't upgrade for another year or two which is when I'll get this game.
Forerunner
Member
Now this is why I bought Doom! Can't wait until Friday.
If i can adjust fov to at least 90, i'll buy it d1.
Here. Just mute the other video and start both at the same time. Fixed it.
We should be able to get close to 100.
Here. Just mute the other video and start both at the same time. Fixed it.
We should be able to get close to 100.
DalikSkywing
Member
Hope I can get 60 fps on mi 970 to, 1070 still another month away damnit.
DeathSparks
Member
Would a GTX 770 be able to keep a stable frame rate?
The fov is actually 120, sadly the guns are still masive because the fov doesn't affect them for some reason.
That's somewhere between min and recommended settings, i think?
I'd imagine the answer is "yes", depending on the settings.
EDIT from Steam store page:
MINIMUM:
OS: Windows 7/8.1/10 (64-bit versions)
Processor: Intel Core i5-2400/AMD FX-8320 or better
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 670 2GB/AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB or better
Storage: 55 GB available space
Additional Notes: Requires Steam activation and broadband internet connection for Multiplayer and SnapMap
RECOMMENDED:
OS: Windows 7/8.1/10 (64-bit versions)
Processor: Intel Core i7-3770/AMD FX-8350 or better
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 970 4GB/AMD Radeon R9 290 4GB or better
Storage: 55 GB available space
Additional Notes: Requires Steam activation and broadband internet connection for Multiplayer and SnapMap
I'm in
Edit: strike that, I have a lowly GTX980 not even a TI
Yeah, I imagine you would be able to keep a stable framerate at console or better settings
I'm waiting until the non-reference model 1080s come out and will be jumping on one of those.
Yeah, same thought. Would love to see that changed, or at the very least modded
Dictator93
Member
Most fps games fake fp models and as such have two fov settings: camera and fp assets. Idtech 5 did it that way and so does this probably.
DeathSparks
Member
Thank god because the Beta ran fine for me
BadAss2961
Member
Man, this is how FPS were meant to be.
I gotta get back in the PC game.
I gotta get back in the PC game.
7DollarHagane
Banned
Will this api benefit all cards or just newest highest end ones?
Bethesda's blog post after the beta implied they've made the game run better with minimum requirements or something like that.
You'll probably be fine, at least if you fiddle with settings.
Presumably those with Vulkan support. So R9 series for AMD at least... unsure about Nvidia's GPUS other than Pascal-based ones.
EDIT https://developer.nvidia.com/vulkan-driver
J
JeremyEtcetera
Unconfirmed Member
Pasting my comment from the other thread here so someone can answer:
MrRemyJe said:
DeathSparks
Member
I'll probably be able to run it at medium settings at the minimum.
Until I get a GTX 1070 this fall this is what I'm gonna have to get used to
All desktop GTX 6xx series cards upwards support Vulkan so far. Not sure what the AMD support looks like, but I'd expect something similar. They'll expand to laptop GPUs eventually
Speed is increased by runes but important differences:
Mouse aim, not controller aim
120 fov, not default on the console version (75? Not sure, but it's less than 90 by a fair bit)
Quick weapon swapping thanks to keyboard, not using the "weapon wheel"
control pads are a travesty for shooting games, I hate having to play exclusive console games with them.
InsaneTiger
Member
Seriously! Bethesda is terrible.
They had a recent "behind the scenes" (without any actual behind-the-scenes info, ugh) promo video where they mention that one of the devs prefers to customize their character by boosting animation/movement speeds over other upgrades.
So my assumption is that this save has gone down the "primarily speed increasing passives" upgrade path. Not everyone will be that fast.
Speed looks perfect to me, tho 😋
Hello? This is Hailun!
Member
This footage looks significantly better than anything they've shown before
terencecah
Member
I usually don't agree with armchair advertising, but i think youre totally correct
I was just wondering since my current card -- the 760, get's me slightly-above-console performance. Knowing it's 60 on consoles makes me believe I'll be able to at least tweak settings until I get there, but I'll probably just wait for the 1070.
I remember hearing that the console versions have dynamic resolutions, tho. So they would always be rendering a 1080p image but, depending on the complexity of the scene, would be scaling up a sub-1080 image.
Edit:
RE: ↓ ↓ ↓
haha, tell me about it
BoboBrazil
Member
So most new games going forward should have vulcan support right?
I wish. But probably not.