I still keep my family's NES. My brother still keeps his Sega Mega Drive. We whip it out whenever there's a family gathering.Do people seriously keep their consoles and games in the next gen and many years after that?
Ubisoft did back in the days with Starforce on Splinter Cell Chaos Theory ..... the funny part is they used RLD's crack to do it in official patch :-D or the old comeback from online-only DRM mess back in the days(same goes for Simcity 2013)Are there any examples of games where the devs removed strong DRM protections later on? (But also within a reasonable time frame, so re-releases of old games on GOG doesn't count)
Are there any examples of games where the devs removed strong DRM protections later on? (But also within a reasonable time frame, so re-releases of old games on GOG doesn't count)
Guess I need to stop preordering indie games now. Too late for Inside, I already preordered that one, but in the future unless the dev specifically states the game doesn't use it I won't be preordering.
If Denuvo goes out of business the most valuable thing to it's creditors is it's Intellectual Property. Therefore there will not be any patch released in the event of Denuvo going under as the process will be sold to some other party who will either carry on like nothing has changed or bury it if they're a competitor. Hope to god it's the former.If Denuvo ever goes out of business, they better have some sort of kill switch that disables it for the games that have it.
I think pirates will only become potential consumers when the majority of games are behind Denuvo-type DRM. Since there are metric tons of Denuvo-free/cracked games, pirates just play whatever new DRM-free game is out. Once enough games get behind protection however, they'll have to make the choice between buying some games or only playing cracked games that are 6 months to one year old (assuming Denuovo doesn't get harder to crack, which it probably will).
Yeah, I'm with thisI'm all for content creators protecting their titles as long as it doesn't actually effect me playing the game.
Are there any examples of games where the devs removed strong DRM protections later on? (But also within a reasonable time frame, so re-releases of old games on GOG doesn't count)
Disappointing news. Denuvo is server based. When that server ends so does the game unless unlocks or cracks happen. I dont support that. If i spend full price i want to own it, like GOG offers. I have an absurdly large Steam collection and it took a long time for me to come to terms with Steam DRM. All the new shit is crap. Bargain bin it is for this game.
You can refund your pre-order or refund after the game releases and get your money back.
https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=6345-QIDX-7244
Denuvo is a good thing, it allows devs to have a safe launch and it doesn't negatively affects consumers.
It could very well be a big deal for the kind of person that likes to keep and replay their old games."what happens when servers shut down?"
yeah, if you buy the game now then I dont see why you'd worry about this... I don't think the servers shutting down in like 5 years+ will do something to you... but keep acting like it's a big deal
crazy how so many here went from "I want the game" to "Well im not buying it anymore"
and that just because devs want to protect their games vs piracy
heck, I have friends who are 20 + and STILL pirate SP only games because " why would I buy it when I can play it for free hehehe"
And it won't even affect like 99% of the people who are complaining about denuvo in this thread.
"what happens when servers shut down?"
yeah, if you buy the game now then I dont see why you'd worry about this... I don't think the servers shutting down in like 5 years+ will do something to you... but keep acting like it's a big deal
It will be, just launch the game one time while you're still connected to the internet. I don't think it ever checks again, or if it does, it's like a month or something.I was planning on playing inside on a 13-hour flight home, but from what I'm seeing here, Denuvo means that won't be possible? That's pretty disappointing.
I still keep my family's NES. My brother still keeps his Sega Mega Drive. We whip it out whenever there's a family gathering.
Ever feel the urge to play Dark Souls again? Well lucky you still can. But keep acting like this is a non-issue.
It is a big fucking deal. And yes, shutting down in 5 years would absolutely affect. I play games older than that all the fucking time.crazy how so many here went from "I want the game" to "Well im not buying it anymore"
and that just because devs want to protect their games vs piracy
heck, I have friends who are 20 + and STILL pirate SP only games because " why would I buy it when I can play it for free hehehe"
And it won't even affect like 99% of the people who are complaining about denuvo in this thread.
"what happens when servers shut down?"
yeah, if you buy the game now then I dont see why you'd worry about this... I don't think the servers shutting down in like 5 years+ will do something to you... but keep acting like it's a big deal
Denuvo is a good thing, it allows devs to have a safe launch and it doesn't negatively affects consumers.
Well, sure. I still have my PS2 as well. But compared to games that can still be played vs the opposite, which are the more common ones?
But is it a fact that if Dark Souls were using Denuvo we won't be able to play it right now? Why are we keep saying that Denuvo games won't be able to run anymore in the future as a fact?
Yeah I know. But Valve sent me a really snarky email about potentially declining future refunds (which I'm fairly certain goes against the orders of the legal proceedings they recently lost in Australia) and I'd rather not have to deal with that over this particular title.
Won't support because DRM so you experience it for free.Aww man, I was really looking forward to this game too. I can't support Denuvo, so I guess it's YouTube for me.
It will be, just launch the game one time while you're still connected to the internet. I don't think it ever checks again, or if it does, it's like a month or something.
Especially when so much of what works comes from actually playing it. The pacing, how that pacing builds and subverts expectations, the feel and fluidity of the animations, and so on...all those are major pillars of the game and what makes it so effective, and you can't get that from passively watching.Won't support because DRM so you experience it for free.
:-|
I mean, I don't agree with DRM, but I don't really agree with "YouTubing" single player story heavy games either.
Especially when so much of what works comes from actually playing it. The pacing, how that pacing builds and subverts expectations, the feel and fluidity of the animations, and so on...all those are major pillars of the game and what makes it so effective, and you can't get that from passively watching.
I would love to experience all of that, but I've had terrible luck with Denuvo and DRM in general. Likely due to my location and terrible connection, but that's something out of my control. Adam Orth would probably disagree.
Might pick this up on sale in a few months or so. Until then it's YouTube or Wikipedia.
Why would you want to ruin it by slogging through another person playing on YouTube when you plan on playing it eventually yourself?
I can't play Episodes from Liberty City on my new PC without downloading a crack because either SecuROM or GFWL (or both) refuse to run on Windows 10. DRM definitely makes a game worse, even if it doesn't affect you right now. If the game's free, feel free to add however much crap you want to it. When you're asking me to pay for it, it's only fair that I get to complain when I don't like something.crazy how so many here went from "I want the game" to "Well im not buying it anymore"
and that just because devs want to protect their games vs piracy
heck, I have friends who are 20 + and STILL pirate SP only games because " why would I buy it when I can play it for free hehehe"
And it won't even affect like 99% of the people who are complaining about denuvo in this thread.
"what happens when servers shut down?"
yeah, if you buy the game now then I dont see why you'd worry about this... I don't think the servers shutting down in like 5 years+ will do something to you... but keep acting like it's a big deal
Or, by not supporting it, you can show that you won't allow third parties to take your games hostage, therefore ensuring that most games avoid it in the future. Not my case, I already bought games with SecuROM and now Denuvo, but I sympathize with people who do this, and sometimes wish I had a bit more self-control when it comes to games that implement such anti-consumer practices.All this "servers shutting down" talk made me think that people love a self-fulfilling prophecy.
You guys should support denuvo, by buying more games with it and guaranteeing its success, you're also guaranteeing its servers.
All this "servers shutting down" talk made me think that people love a self-fulfilling prophecy.
You guys should support denuvo, by buying more games with it and guaranteeing its success, you're also guaranteeing its servers.
The thing I don't get is that it's only $20. It's not like you're taking out a mortgage here. Even if the severs shut down in 5 years, that's still only $20 for a game you've been able to enjoy for a long time.crazy how so many here went from "I want the game" to "Well im not buying it anymore"
and that just because devs want to protect their games vs piracy
heck, I have friends who are 20 + and STILL pirate SP only games because " why would I buy it when I can play it for free hehehe"
And it won't even affect like 99% of the people who are complaining about denuvo in this thread.
"what happens when servers shut down?"
yeah, if you buy the game now then I dont see why you'd worry about this... I don't think the servers shutting down in like 5 years+ will do something to you... but keep acting like it's a big deal
Let's be clear, DRM like this isn't a deal breaker, but I consider it just as much a failure as a significant bug. Thus it very much affects the value I place on the game. Sometimes it is enough to tip the balance and even more so these days when a person is spoiled for choice.The thing I don't get is that it's only $20. It's not like you're taking out a mortgage here. Even if the severs shut down in 5 years, that's still only $20 for a game you've been able to enjoy for a long time.
I do understand the argument that people just don't want to support denuvo, but I suspect those people were on the fence about the game anyway.
If Denuvo goes out of business the most valuable thing to it's creditors is it's Intellectual Property. Therefore there will not be any patch released in the event of Denuvo going under as the process will be sold to some other party who will either carry on like nothing has changed or bury it if they're a competitor. Hope to god it's the former.
The thing that you're missing is that there are tons of other games coming out. Even if someone's dying to play Inside, they have an entire world of Denuvo-free titles to choose from instead. It's not about the price being low, it's about the whole package (game + DRM) being unappealing, even if the game by itself seems awesome.The thing I don't get is that it's only $20. It's not like you're taking out a mortgage here. Even if the severs shut down in 5 years, that's still only $20 for a game you've been able to enjoy for a long time.
I do understand the argument that people just don't want to support denuvo, but I suspect those people were on the fence about the game anyway.
Basically this. I can afford the $60 that Quantum Break costs on the Windows 10 Store, and it's a game that I'd love to play (I'm a huge Max Payne fan, although I didn't care for Alan Wake). I won't buy it though, because I think UWAs aren't worth that. That's not a platform I want to support. It's a shame that good games will be skipped because of this, but that's not my fault. It wasn't me who chose the platform or DRM they'd be bundled with, so why should I pay to deal with the consequences they bring?Let's be clear, DRM like this isn't a deal breaker, but I consider it just as much a failure as a significant bug. Thus it very much affects the value I place on the game. Sometimes it is enough to tip the balance and even more so these days when a person is spoiled for choice.
The thing I don't get is that it's only $20. It's not like you're taking out a mortgage here. Even if the severs shut down in 5 years, that's still only $20 for a game you've been able to enjoy for a long time.
I do understand the argument that people just don't want to support denuvo, but I suspect those people were on the fence about the game anyway.
All this "servers shutting down" talk made me think that people love a self-fulfilling prophecy.
You guys should support denuvo, by buying more games with it and guaranteeing its success, you're also guaranteeing its servers.
That's indeed very interesting, thank you for linking it.
The top 10% of infringers (who accounted for just 1.6% of all Internet users over 12) were responsible for a massive 79% of all infringed content. Pull in another 10%, to consider the top 20% of all infringers (equal to 3.2% of all Internet users over 12), and this group were responsible for 88% of all infringements.
This means that the other 80% of the total infringers accounted for just 12% of all infringements by volume.
Across all content types, the top 20% of infringers on average not only spend more than the remaining 80% of infringers, but also more than consumers who never infringe. The figures are impressive – the 20% worst infringers spent £168 over the six month monitoring period with the remaining 80% spending £105. Tailing in last place were the ‘honest’ consumers with just £54 spent, three times less than the prolific pirate group.
I've heard this being mentioned a few times but have never read the full study.
The thing I don't get is that it's only $20. It's not like you're taking out a mortgage here. Even if the severs shut down in 5 years, that's still only $20 for a game you've been able to enjoy for a long time.
I do understand the argument that people just don't want to support denuvo, but I suspect those people were on the fence about the game anyway.
Seconded. Yay for a reasonable response!
A game entirely DRM free being a huge success, released on a popular storefront that is DRM free, all owned by a mother-company which was basically built on what happens when copyright goes astray and preservation is ignored. No fucking shit it's brought up. It's what happens when you 1) care long term, and 2) treat your customers with respect and not as opportunistic thieves.
Yeah, I think so too. There's no way such large games are using Denuvo without there being any contingency for server failure/shut downI feel like it would take an incredibly drastic event for these Denuvo games to be unplayable in the future. Like, on the scale that it would be understandable why it lost function. Barring some insane occurrence, I'm not sold that this is a one-way ticket to games not working. If there's is a problem, there will be something in place to correct it.