Wyndstryker
Member
Not the best looking console, but smaller is always better imo.
i'm horrible at judging these things, but isn't it about the size of a Wii U? similar dimensions at least?
Sony home console redesigns are always ugly. PSOne, PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim and now this.
no way, PS2 fat was amazing.
It looks like a pollen remover.
It's like the complete opposite of the phatboy, which looked expensive and elegant. This looks horrible and cheap.
Wow I didnt realize it may be slim but it's still f'n massive
Ah no its not.Wow I didnt realize it may be slim but it's still f'n massive
To me The ridges give off a distinctive 70/80s vibe, which in itself isn't a terrible thing, but because the rest of it is shiny and smooth it just doesn't work.
It looks like a cheap knockoff of an 80s Bang & Olufsen, and those have some sentimental value. I know 80s is retro chic now, but this is retro sans the chic, it's like it literally could've come out then, without the contemporary knowledge of design and production materials. As such it's probably not the ugliest, stuff like Turbografx are probably uglier on face value. But it's definitely the ugliest piece of shit when looked at the timeframe of release.
laser tag prop.
Wow I didnt realize it may be slim but it's still f'n massive
Gravy, I swear you're my nemesis. The anti-me. PSOne and PS3 slim were good. PS2 slim was alright-ish even if dull. I wouldn't pick up the originals of those consoles over the redesigns.Sony home console redesigns are always ugly. PSOne, PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim and now this.
not really. it looks pretty small.
They should have done this. How much more expensive could it be?
good I hope the last revision is cheaper now. So I can buy a bluray player