Putonahappyface
Gold Member
If you don't want to be here, you know where to go.
Unless you're perm'd there like everyone else.
If you don't want to be here, you know where to go.
Unless you're perm'd there like everyone else.
Yup.So, it took more than a month to notice these changes.
It is so funny that people here and on era are crying over this. Noone is satisfied.
Come on, that is not the point. Removing it does absolutely nothing but earn brownie points. It sends a message to the fans: we will now pander to what the status quo is.The caricatures in this thread about folks in the trans community are something else.
For removing low effort, punch down jokes? Ok. Sure.
Pushback against this stuff in the thread is not because of some alleged pearl-clutching about the removal of side content from a nine year old game. It's about:
(1) developers coerced to change their vision due to Internet activist pressure;
(2) a pattern. If you think people in this thread are taking objection to this particular, small incident, then... I recommend you work on strengthening your critical thinking skills.
People have the right to be skeptical of the direction western-developed games are heading towards.
R* is the creator and they should do what they want to do. You people whine too much.I don't think people are frustrated about these changes to GTAV, but about the implications that come with it about the studio's output moving forward. Heavy satire is burnt into GTA's DNA and if you take that away you're changing the identity of the franchise. It's like moving from classic comedy to woke comedy.
Will R* stick to their guns for GTAVI and do what they do best and that's making fun of everyone?
I asked this question last year, I guess R* might've answered that question for me.
Define woman.
*No one* should be using that word. You don't bother hiding your hypocrisy, do you?What "Black stereotypes?" And why would you remove that use of the N-word among two urban black men(s)?
…
Well, the bigger question is - are creators allowed to make changes to their work?Pushback against this stuff in the thread is not because of some alleged pearl-clutching about the removal of side content from a nine year old game. It's about:
(1) developers coerced to change their vision due to Internet activist pressure;
(2) a pattern. If you think people in this thread are taking objection to this particular, small incident, then... I recommend you work on strengthening your critical thinking skills.
People have the right to be skeptical of the direction western-developed games are heading towards.
You are clearly not getting it, it's never about logic, it's always about shutting you up.I consider myself very progressive, but isn't one of the main points of games like GTA to make fun of everything and everyone, nobody's sacred? They mock rich Republicans, poor folks in rural areas, black youth that ends up in gang wars, the excessively brutal police, the fake shit on TV, the sexual freedom and so on. That's been GTA for the longest time: a hyper-exaggerated view of the USA where all problems, social issues, political themes and such are taken to the extreme, with the player that can be anyone and do anything with very minor consequences, in a world where everyone hates everything. If these jokes offend you, clearly GTA isn't the game for you. Why fight for the game to remove that one specific joke, then turn the other way when they mock other people?
Especially the new gender select screen
- Agender
- Androgyne
- Androgynous
- Bigender
- Cis
- Cisgender
- Cis Female
- Cis Male
- Cis Man
- Cis Woman
- Cisgender Female
- Cisgender Male
- Cisgender Man
- Cisgender Woman
- Female to Male
- FTM
- Gender Fluid
- Gender Nonconforming
- Gender Questioning
- Gender Variant
- Genderqueer
- Intersex
- Male to Female
- MTF
- Neither
- Neutrois
- Non-binary
- Other
- Pangender
- Trans
- Trans*
- Trans Female
- Trans* Female
- Trans Male
- Trans* Male
- Trans Man
- Trans* Man
- Trans Person
- Trans* Person
- Trans Woman
- Trans* Woman
- Transfeminine
- Transgender
- Transgender Female
- Transgender Male
- Transgender Man
- Transgender Person
- Transgender Woman
- Transmasculine
- Transsexual
- Transsexual Female
- Transsexual Male
- Transsexual Man
- Transsexual Person
- Transsexual Woman
- Two-Spirit
I agree the true winner is Rockstar they are milking the game, gaining money while we are fighting each other… and Rockstar either gets applause or "they are being censured"It is a nine-year old game that they are still monetizing, they are only "coerced" so far as they want to make as much money as possible, and the changes are so god damned minor that only someone who is actively tracking "woke trends" would have ever noticed.
Now THAT is funny. Thanks for the laugh.Can you think of a single modern media product that satirizes a community specifically for what they perceive to be an immutable quality? Where are the satires of Blacks that are only based on them being Black? What about the brutal takedowns of the gay community with commentary focused SOLELY on them being gay?
There are a number of ways to satire these communities that aren't based in mocking their existence.
Define define.Define woman.
Are you being serious?What "Black stereotypes?" And why would you remove that use of the N-word among two urban black men(s)?
That population is extremely discriminated and subjected to constant mockery and harassment.What exactly is it with games and trans representation that always come up and game companies feel the need to censor?
They were not coerced. They did because they wanted to.Pushback against this stuff in the thread is not because of some alleged pearl-clutching about the removal of side content from a nine year old game. It's about:
(1) developers coerced to change their vision due to Internet activist pressure;
(2) a pattern. If you think people in this thread are taking objection to this particular, small incident, then... I recommend you work on strengthening your critical thinking skills.
People have the right to be skeptical of the direction western-developed games are heading towards.
If they are copying other businesses (non-gaming ones too), are they really pursuing what they want though, or just as afraid?R* is the creator and they should do what they want to do. You people whine too much.
*No one* should be using that word. You don't bother hiding your hypocrisy, do you?
Are you being serious?
Multi-million seller game with extremely lucrative online counterpart developer is not afraid at all lol, what are you talking about? They could've let this in the game and nothing would change but maybe, just maybe, they have a brain, saw they did this 9 years ago, realized it was low effort and tasteless and decided to take out of the game.If they are copying other businesses (non-gaming ones too), are they really pursuing what they want though, or just as afraid?
punch down jokes
History has proven that no western company is big enough to be immune to woke culture so why do you think R* is special. Coincidently they came to their "senses" just around the same time as everyone else did, not before or after but now. Too convenient don't you think?Multi-million seller game with extremely lucrative online counterpart developer is not afraid at all lol, what are you talking about? They could've let this in the game and nothing would change but maybe, just maybe, they have a brain, saw they did this 9 years ago, realized it was low effort and tasteless and decided to take out of the game.
What "Black stereotypes?" And why would you remove that use of the N-word among two urban black men(s)?
I'm assuming you mean THE BOONDOCKS and not BOONDOCK SAINTS; and THE BOONDOCKS is absolutely fantastic because it is satire done right. None of the jokes are laughing at Black's for being black. The "ITIS" (and the absolutely cynicism in it) and "THUGNIFICENT" episodes are leagues better than the jam-session, "whatever sticks" style of jokes that are peppered in GTAV. Why? Because the jokes are part of a larger criticism of Black attitudes towards health and homosexuality. It's not a throwaway gag on the side of a delivery van.
No, I don't. I think they reassessed the game and realized it was boring and tasteless.History has proven that no western company is big enough to be immune to woke culture so why do you think R* is special. Coincidently they came to their "senses" just around the same time as everyone else did, not before or after but now. Too convenient don't you think?
I love this idea that everone involved with gaming, movies, music, and basically the whole entertainment sector, all suddenly 'woke' up 5-10 years ago and realized just how 'bad' they had been. It also convenaintly alines with when the whole SJW/Wokeness/Cancel culture rose up. Funny that.No, I don't. I think they reassessed the game and realized it was boring and tasteless.
Nope, society needs to be given the opportunity to distinguishing fact from fiction, satire from sobriety and comedy from tragedy.That population is extremely discriminated and subjected to constant mockery and harassment.
Do we really need to encourage that kind of behavior by having these type of jokes in the most popular game of all time?
I don't know man, to me it's like kicking someone who is already down.
I can pretty much guarantee if 80s Care Bears cartoons released today there would be plenty these modern whack jobs would find offensive and they'd move to cancel that as well.Another pathetic move, it's only a detail and still too afraid to hurt an extreme vocal minority. This society is truly sick. And saying this while being myself from several "minority".
Just cancel everything and make Grand Carebears Auto 6.
![]()
'They are making fun of furries, i'm so damn offended!'I can pretty much guarantee if 80s Care Bears cartoons released today there would be plenty these modern whack jobs would find offensive and they'd move to cancel that as well.
It's happening, and Carmack & Sweeney are based….
![]()
Bring an end to this downward spiral….
I knew you would respond with that nonsense. The word is racist, full stop.What hypocrisy? That Blacks, who have largely co-opted a word once used to denigrate, make a distinction between their usage of it and say. . .anyone else, is perfectly fine? Yes. Hypocrisy. Much is.
. . .seriously if you're argument is "If I can't use the word. . ." maybe it's not a great argument.
. . .
Yes, but why did it have to be changed in the first place if it changes nothing? Removing content sucks.People having meltdown here over this change is pathetic. This virtually changes nothing in the game experience.
are you serious?Not surprising the leftists are in this thread being hypocrites.
Troons are disgusting, so I'm happy they removed them. My son was getting scared by seeing those monstrosities in the game and I try to help my family avoid seeing those types of degenerates in real life so I appreciate Rockstar helping me guard my family against further pedophilic degeneracy.