• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rockstar has removed several transphobic elements from next-gen GTA V

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you don't want to be here, you know where to go.

Unless you're perm'd there like everyone else.
wwBlx6D.png



TrlJuxm.gif
 
So, it took more than a month to notice these changes.
It is so funny that people here and on era are crying over this. Noone is satisfied.
Yup.

And morons saying shit like, "this is why I'm not excited for GTA6" are kind of pathetic.

I'm not a huge fan of censorship either, but don't be petty about it.
 
The caricatures in this thread about folks in the trans community are something else.



For removing low effort, punch down jokes? Ok. Sure.
Come on, that is not the point. Removing it does absolutely nothing but earn brownie points. It sends a message to the fans: we will now pander to what the status quo is.

It's true, some people here hate trans people, to the point they imagine them being in games like TLOU2, but that doesn't change the fact that one can be concerned they won't push the envelope as far as they did in the past anymore, because we now have protected categories out there.

Yeah, I'm with you, making fun of trans people for being trans and gay people for being gay si absolutely low lever trash, but you can still make fun of the insane shit we hear constantly.

A great satire of American society today should absolutely hit the right, with their Jesus freaks and the insane low standards that make you call Donald Trump the best president of all times, but it should also make fun of the terrible state of the media, trans activists and the harm they're making to the LGBT community and all the race baiting.

Does this crappy, useless change, made only to bring the game "in line" with the morality of the current left make you believe the game won't spare punches to the blue haired mob? If it does, I wish I were you.

Because I hate wokeness as much as I hate fascists, racists and homophobes, and I'm tired of living in a world were common sense seems to be completely gone.
 
Last edited:
Pushback against this stuff in the thread is not because of some alleged pearl-clutching about the removal of side content from a nine year old game. It's about:

(1) developers coerced to change their vision due to Internet activist pressure;
(2) a pattern. If you think people in this thread are taking objection to this particular, small incident, then... I recommend you work on strengthening your critical thinking skills.

People have the right to be skeptical of the direction western-developed games are heading towards.

It is a nine-year old game that they are still monetizing, they are only "coerced" so far as they want to make as much money as possible, and the changes are so god damned minor that only someone who is actively tracking "woke trends" would have ever noticed.
 
I don't think people are frustrated about these changes to GTAV, but about the implications that come with it about the studio's output moving forward. Heavy satire is burnt into GTA's DNA and if you take that away you're changing the identity of the franchise. It's like moving from classic comedy to woke comedy.

Will R* stick to their guns for GTAVI and do what they do best and that's making fun of everyone?
I asked this question last year, I guess R* might've answered that question for me.
R* is the creator and they should do what they want to do. You people whine too much.
 
Pushback against this stuff in the thread is not because of some alleged pearl-clutching about the removal of side content from a nine year old game. It's about:

(1) developers coerced to change their vision due to Internet activist pressure;
(2) a pattern. If you think people in this thread are taking objection to this particular, small incident, then... I recommend you work on strengthening your critical thinking skills.

People have the right to be skeptical of the direction western-developed games are heading towards.
Well, the bigger question is - are creators allowed to make changes to their work?
And if they are (and I believe that they are), is it possible to step over the line?

Removal of two jokes changes the original vision way less than higher framerate, resolution, improved graphics and especially HDR support (which makes the game prettier, but affects the tone of the game).
You can still purchase the original version and you can boycott R if you don't like this (although I am sure that I will see all the people complaining in the GTA6 OT).

There were way "worse" examples like Superhot VR. I've bought that game and I get why they've made the changes, but in that case, the game would affect me way less if I've played it after it was patched.
 
I consider myself very progressive, but isn't one of the main points of games like GTA to make fun of everything and everyone, nobody's sacred? They mock rich Republicans, poor folks in rural areas, black youth that ends up in gang wars, the excessively brutal police, the fake shit on TV, the sexual freedom and so on. That's been GTA for the longest time: a hyper-exaggerated view of the USA where all problems, social issues, political themes and such are taken to the extreme, with the player that can be anyone and do anything with very minor consequences, in a world where everyone hates everything. If these jokes offend you, clearly GTA isn't the game for you. Why fight for the game to remove that one specific joke, then turn the other way when they mock other people?
You are clearly not getting it, it's never about logic, it's always about shutting you up.

Cp2077 has got to be the most trans friendly game ever made. Choose your own voice, genitalia, and there's even a trans character voiced by a real trans. Everyone in night city is a commodity, no matter the gender.

But how it turns out? 2077 is called as being the most transphobic game! People are also criticizing that it is not making enough effort to change the "pronouns" for different voices! To record another hundreds and thousand of lines just to cater to them.

It is never enough, and never about logic. It's about shutting you up deliberately and you have to swallow it. The moment you voice something slightly to the contrary, then they can attach you with whatever "phobic" or "cist" term that is trendy.
 
This is dumb. I'm pretty sure they left the white jokes in there still, the black jokes still in, etc. As they should be: it's a satire of exaggerated American criminal culture and it's entertainment aimed at ADULTS. Also these are criminals; they are not saints and never meant to be, so of course they are going to say offensive things. Imagine Tony Soprano, Walter White or Omar taking a pause to ask for a victim's pronouns before shooting them. Unless it's comedy, it's dumb.

This is just more of the coddling of adults and regression of sensibilities. It's showing preferential treatment for one group over others: either they are too "good" to be given the same level of treatment of others, or are too "weak" and infantile to handle treatment others might be subjected to. Either way, it sends a pretty bad and I'd say even condescending message to the group they supposedly are trying to empower or protect.

But also keep this in mind: like with most overt political virtue-signal moves, it's NOT the majority of the people in the group itself asking for this stuff. Mainly, because that majority are only a statistic in the eyes of the people at these companies who do these things. Rather most of the time, the only ones wanting this stuff or care enough to want it, are in the extreme minority, and tend to be hyper-progressive liberal whites.

All I'm saying is, if you want to remove or ban jokes about one group, if you actually believe in genuine equality you'd remove and ban jokes about all groups. Fair is fair. There's no point in doing this selectivity IMO. And yes I understand that certain types of people may tend to be the butt of jokes or harassment more than others, and that's unfortunate. It shouldn't be like that, but if you want that to change then it has to be organically and come from hearts and minds of people changing from within, not giant corporations and governments coddling & treating full-functioning, grown adults like children and chiding them on what's right from wrong.

The vast majority of adults know right from wrong, it's why societies in general are able to function.
 
Last edited:
Especially the new gender select screen

  • Agender
  • Androgyne
  • Androgynous
  • Bigender
  • Cis
  • Cisgender
  • Cis Female
  • Cis Male
  • Cis Man
  • Cis Woman
  • Cisgender Female
  • Cisgender Male
  • Cisgender Man
  • Cisgender Woman
  • Female to Male
  • FTM
  • Gender Fluid
  • Gender Nonconforming
  • Gender Questioning
  • Gender Variant
  • Genderqueer
  • Intersex
  • Male to Female
  • MTF
  • Neither
  • Neutrois
  • Non-binary
  • Other
  • Pangender
  • Trans
  • Trans*
  • Trans Female
  • Trans* Female
  • Trans Male
  • Trans* Male
  • Trans Man
  • Trans* Man
  • Trans Person
  • Trans* Person
  • Trans Woman
  • Trans* Woman
  • Transfeminine
  • Transgender
  • Transgender Female
  • Transgender Male
  • Transgender Man
  • Transgender Person
  • Transgender Woman
  • Transmasculine
  • Transsexual
  • Transsexual Female
  • Transsexual Male
  • Transsexual Man
  • Transsexual Person
  • Transsexual Woman
  • Two-Spirit

That would actually be funny IMO.
You have options for male, female and other. When you select other your list comes up. Just chuck in a helicopter option as well.
 
Not sure if I care too much, but it does raise questions.

The game is filled with demeaning stereotypes from all walks of life, it's integrated into its world, like South Park. Why are other problematic representations ok and fun but not this?

GTA is known as a game where you drive across the sidewalks for fun, why is the video game industry obsessed with trans representation but ultra-violence is fine?

What exactly is it with games and trans representation that always come up and game companies feel the need to censor?
 
It is a nine-year old game that they are still monetizing, they are only "coerced" so far as they want to make as much money as possible, and the changes are so god damned minor that only someone who is actively tracking "woke trends" would have ever noticed.
I agree the true winner is Rockstar they are milking the game, gaining money while we are fighting each other… and Rockstar either gets applause or "they are being censured"

As if they would care… as long as they can keep selling the game they will do anything.
 
It's bad enough they pull music due to licensing, it's another then they change things because 1% of 1% of the population MIGHT be offended and not buy it.

Not that I was ever going to buy this again. I bought it when it came out and played it how the artists and world builders intended. If I want to play it with better visuals I can add mods that make it an order of magnitude better looking than what Rockstar slapped together.
 
youre all fucking weird. I think it's less "woke" to remove it actually.

but who cares.

You guys that bitch too much about these things need to get into game development.
 
Can you think of a single modern media product that satirizes a community specifically for what they perceive to be an immutable quality? Where are the satires of Blacks that are only based on them being Black? What about the brutal takedowns of the gay community with commentary focused SOLELY on them being gay?

There are a number of ways to satire these communities that aren't based in mocking their existence.
Now THAT is funny. Thanks for the laugh.
 
What exactly is it with games and trans representation that always come up and game companies feel the need to censor?
That population is extremely discriminated and subjected to constant mockery and harassment.
Do we really need to encourage that kind of behavior by having these type of jokes in the most popular game of all time?
I don't know man, to me it's like kicking someone who is already down.
 
Pushback against this stuff in the thread is not because of some alleged pearl-clutching about the removal of side content from a nine year old game. It's about:

(1) developers coerced to change their vision due to Internet activist pressure;
(2) a pattern. If you think people in this thread are taking objection to this particular, small incident, then... I recommend you work on strengthening your critical thinking skills.

People have the right to be skeptical of the direction western-developed games are heading towards.
They were not coerced. They did because they wanted to.
 
*No one* should be using that word. You don't bother hiding your hypocrisy, do you?

What hypocrisy? That Blacks, who have largely co-opted a word once used to denigrate, make a distinction between their usage of it and say. . .anyone else, is perfectly fine? Yes. Hypocrisy. Much is.

. . .seriously if you're argument is "If I can't use the word. . ." maybe it's not a great argument.

Are you being serious?

. . .are you?
 
If they are copying other businesses (non-gaming ones too), are they really pursuing what they want though, or just as afraid?
Multi-million seller game with extremely lucrative online counterpart developer is not afraid at all lol, what are you talking about? They could've let this in the game and nothing would change but maybe, just maybe, they have a brain, saw they did this 9 years ago, realized it was low effort and tasteless and decided to take out of the game.
 
Multi-million seller game with extremely lucrative online counterpart developer is not afraid at all lol, what are you talking about? They could've let this in the game and nothing would change but maybe, just maybe, they have a brain, saw they did this 9 years ago, realized it was low effort and tasteless and decided to take out of the game.
History has proven that no western company is big enough to be immune to woke culture so why do you think R* is special. Coincidently they came to their "senses" just around the same time as everyone else did, not before or after but now. Too convenient don't you think?
 
What "Black stereotypes?" And why would you remove that use of the N-word among two urban black men(s)?



I'm assuming you mean THE BOONDOCKS and not BOONDOCK SAINTS; and THE BOONDOCKS is absolutely fantastic because it is satire done right. None of the jokes are laughing at Black's for being black. The "ITIS" (and the absolutely cynicism in it) and "THUGNIFICENT" episodes are leagues better than the jam-session, "whatever sticks" style of jokes that are peppered in GTAV. Why? Because the jokes are part of a larger criticism of Black attitudes towards health and homosexuality. It's not a throwaway gag on the side of a delivery van.

The Boondocks have gotten the same criticism as you're saying here, there's a lot of people who get offended by it and it's VERY aggressive in its depiction.
A lot of racists do watch it and take it seriously too just like how transphobes will take stuff in GTA seriously.

Why does it matter if it's a '' throwaway gag ''? GTA is full to the brim of it I don't think that people who do drag or trans people are and should be immune to it.
Yes some people will take it seriously but so what, there's plenty of people who take the jabs at redneck republicans seriously and those people are generally very poor and low in the social chain making fun of them is also '' punching down ''.
 
History has proven that no western company is big enough to be immune to woke culture so why do you think R* is special. Coincidently they came to their "senses" just around the same time as everyone else did, not before or after but now. Too convenient don't you think?
No, I don't. I think they reassessed the game and realized it was boring and tasteless.
 
No, I don't. I think they reassessed the game and realized it was boring and tasteless.
I love this idea that everone involved with gaming, movies, music, and basically the whole entertainment sector, all suddenly 'woke' up 5-10 years ago and realized just how 'bad' they had been. It also convenaintly alines with when the whole SJW/Wokeness/Cancel culture rose up. Funny that.
Its so cute.
 
Last edited:
That population is extremely discriminated and subjected to constant mockery and harassment.
Do we really need to encourage that kind of behavior by having these type of jokes in the most popular game of all time?
I don't know man, to me it's like kicking someone who is already down.
Nope, society needs to be given the opportunity to distinguishing fact from fiction, satire from sobriety and comedy from tragedy.

The entire concept of gta is to be morally and mercilessly unsavoury. Well, at least it used to be.
 
Anyone who's offended by anything is a weak person and should do the world a favor and off themselves. Yes, the world is a better place without you. Bye-bye.
 
Another pathetic move, it's only a detail and still too afraid to hurt an extreme vocal minority. This society is truly sick. And saying this while being myself from several "minority".

Just cancel everything and make Grand Carebears Auto 6.
Care Bears Cartoon GIF
I can pretty much guarantee if 80s Care Bears cartoons released today there would be plenty these modern whack jobs would find offensive and they'd move to cancel that as well.
 
It's happening, and Carmack & Sweeney are based….

p2jLN8l.jpg


Bring an end to this downward spiral….

so open up twitter to freedom to be racist, homophobic , heave threats of rape and murder and what other types people want to be on twitter without any kind of punishment for it?
 
I never saw these characters in my game, but I sure don't miss them either. Good riddance.

People claiming this means you won't be able to steal, murder or carry out many other crimes in GTA6....really, now?

That's a huge stretch. Like Mr. Fantastic levels of stretchiness.
 
Last edited:
Not enough boycot those fucking bigots
Close Gta online

Maybe then i will get SP content
 
What hypocrisy? That Blacks, who have largely co-opted a word once used to denigrate, make a distinction between their usage of it and say. . .anyone else, is perfectly fine? Yes. Hypocrisy. Much is.

. . .seriously if you're argument is "If I can't use the word. . ." maybe it's not a great argument.



. . .
I knew you would respond with that nonsense. The word is racist, full stop.
 
On the one hand I've not come across the removed content in game so them removing it doesn't bother me that much on the other hand it seems a bit like pandering to people that probably don't even play the game in the first place.
 
Not surprising the leftists are in this thread being hypocrites.

Troons are disgusting, so I'm happy they removed them. My son was getting scared by seeing those monstrosities in the game and I try to help my family avoid seeing those types of degenerates in real life so I appreciate Rockstar helping me guard my family against further pedophilic degeneracy.
 
Not surprising the leftists are in this thread being hypocrites.

Troons are disgusting, so I'm happy they removed them. My son was getting scared by seeing those monstrosities in the game and I try to help my family avoid seeing those types of degenerates in real life so I appreciate Rockstar helping me guard my family against further pedophilic degeneracy.
are you serious?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom