clem84
Gold Member
Exactly. This trend will continue and grow, but also probably many people will rush to get anticipated games at 70$ so publishers will probably think it was the right call.already wait for sales at 60....
Exactly. This trend will continue and grow, but also probably many people will rush to get anticipated games at 70$ so publishers will probably think it was the right call.already wait for sales at 60....
I dont know if the 'development costs' thing can be used as an excuse as much next gen. Didnt some devs already say that costs and development time may actually go down next gen?, pretty sure i read that. And ray tracing is supposed to save a lot of time and money over having to do fake lighting. Then the consoles should be powerful enough for studios to use stuff like lazer scanners to scan objects and get a 3d asset instantly, as oppose to having a dev spend a whole day making a cup etc.Eh...not really. I know "rising development costs" and all, but I'm still fine with the level of graphics we had in the gen of PS360, so it's a really hard sell for me to be paying more for a graphics upgrade that I never asked for.
Similar in Poland. The game now is 250pln and people earn 2k. 70usd will be 300pln...As many of you are aware, I'm brazilian. The current exchange rate makes $70 the equivalent of over R$ 370 in BR money. That's over 1/3 of the local minimum wage. I can't begin to justify it.
lol i was waiting for Gamepass to be blamed for this, i'm surprised it took 2 pages before someone mentioned it.Yeah whatever. One way to pay devs more opting into gamepass
99,5% of people would buy (they don't really have a choice) impulse buy, others wont which wont make any difference in the grand scheme of things.
(excuse my bad eng)
I'm scrolling through the comments, and it's 2009 all over again - you guys said the exact same things last time, only to keep paying 60$ instead of 50 throughout the past decade on day one over and over again, so please, stop lying to yourself, yo know you won't stop gaming, and that 10$ isn't god knows how much money to kill you hobby. Once every publisher jumps on the 70$ ship and that's the only value you'll see, after a year you'll forget games used to be 60$. People are used to everything going up, no one will bat an eye when games will too.
$70 is more than $60. It's not the same.
Tons of people on here don't buy movies anymore, or music, or go to the theater, or do lots of other things they used to do a lot, but are no longer worth it.
Maybe for that rare game once a year you just have to have? But of course, tons of people are going to stop buying as many games as they currently do, or stop buying them altogether new.
I'm not sure Gaf represent 0,1% of the gaming community worldwide (the poll doesn't mean anything), also the main target selling games are kids/teens, adults are just icing on the cake.Well, the results of the poll thus far would indicate you're pretty far off the mark.
Are games cheap? Relatively. But they were expensive in the 80s. Those prices needed to come down.
I think the older we get the more patient we get and if im not dying to play a game im more than happy waiting to save 40-50%.
So yea I'll pay full price here and there but by and large? No way.