I don't mean to be rude but I think this game is getting inflated reviews. I played the game at best buy and I've seen tons of video content and I really don't it deserves such a high score. It's kind of like GTA IV everyone gave it 10s because of the hype but a big chunk of players felt it just wasn't that good especially as a GTA game. To me 9.5s and 9.6s should go to really ambitious titles like Mario 64 and Mario Galaxy this game plays it way too safe.
Try watching a stream or something and at least try to gain a decent understanding of the Galaxy-esque creativity and exellent design that
every damn review points out before attempting to invalidate them based on an early in store demo and a trailer or two. maybe there's a reason the game is seeing unanimous praise. Maybe your assumptions about the game have been off base, oh wait no way high scores must be moneyhatted or inflated bc they don't align with my original kneejerk response to the game that still forms my opinion of it today or whatever
God damn. Every bit of media and every review at this point describe a game with as much level and gameplay variety as Galaxy, with music as great as Galaxies, and plenty of new features/interesting gimmicks/new concepts for power ups/new art styles/etc. etc. and you still can't let go of the perception that this game is still somehow some sort of lesser Mario. It's clear that it doesn't matter how legitimately good the game actually is because nothing will change the opinion you made for yourself about the game months ago.
It's amazing that when unanimous praise and reviews start to depict a game literally the polar opposite from the game you've been describing for the last few months - one that's not as lazy or safe as originally percieved, one that mixes things up like Galaxy did on a level to level basis, with an ever changing art style and incredible music, and a lot of merit as a fun multiplayer 3D platformer that can stand alongside Galaxy 1 and 2 despite being very different from them (and reviewing as well as them despite not having much more than the quality of its gameplay to fall back on - lacking GTA IV's years of hype, 'immersion, scale, Oscar worthy story' that distracted from its middling gameplay resulting in crazy review scores, and indeed lacks its reputation for sacrificing its strongest points to drive home some visual next gen scope and feel, and really just comes together to make for a poor comparison)- your response is to simply say, "Well, those reviewers, THEY MUST BE WRONG TOO" >.> as though it's impossible for you to think to take one step back and think, hey, maybe I have treated the game unfairly if literally everything out there in regards to the game goes against the complaints I had for it. it really,
really says something when all it took from an
extremely spotty developer is to go 'Look curved levels n shit' and copy wholesale from
Mario's repertoire for you to go "BEST SINCE THE NINETIES HAHAHA" (despite it turning out to be an objectively mediocre game) - buuuuuuuuut review scores and perceptions for a game developed by a team that's been busting out
record scoring games on the regular must be 'inflated' because they don't align with your perception of what the game is.
tl;dr here i was thinking that this game's impressive critical reception might be enough to get some of you to reconsider your stance and maybe give it another chance. nope. you're doubling down and it looks ridiculous