So many children, all of them wearing pajamas, attacked during their sleep
The world are playing double standards with Egypt and Syria, in Egypt their warning to pull support away from the Egyptian army although they haven't used brute force as AL Assad did, while in Syria it's just harmless condemnation.
Assad wins this war without chemical weapons, why should he use them?
False flag operation by a rebel group? Or is Assad really that brazenly confident in Russian support?
Not if Russia has anything to say about it.
I don't remember the Egyptian Army using F16 planes and chemical weapons in Cairo?1000 dead in Egypt in a week's span isn't brute force?
It may not be killing children with nerve gas while they sleep, but what the Egyptian army is doing certainly can't be classified as acceptable.
EDIT: The evidence looks strong for the attack but I found an question on Reddit that is interesting no matter what part you support (This is most likely from a Assad supporter as he has a little Syrian flag next to his username):
"My question pertains to the logicality of using chemical weapons on a small scale?"
Damn, that video ...
Can we finally send in the troops? US, Europe, Turkey?
Ignore Russia. They're supporting human rights abuse in their own country and abroad.
To "cut of the head" maybe?
Intel indicates that Rebel leader XY has set up his HQ in a certain district, troops cannot enter for obvious reasons, artillery strikes are too ineffective/the infrastructure is too valuable...
Isn't it precision bombing?Presumably you mean tactical bombing?
Anyway, absolutely horrific this, there's really not much you can say beyond that is there? :/
Maybe Egypt and Turkey can do something with their ridiculously huge armies that each has more tanks and jet fighters then France and the UK combined. Something other then shooting their own citizens.
So is this a red enough line?
Why would assad use chemical weapons when he had just invited UN chemical weapon experts to Syria? And they are there? To investigate allegations that he used chemical weapons?
Why would assad use chemical weapons when he had just invited UN chemical weapon experts to Syria? And they are there? To investigate allegations that he used chemical weapons?
No fly zone and tactical bombing in 3, 2, 1....
So Syria does something that we accused Iraq of doing which led to the invasion, and we do what? Oh, yeah...
Sure they did.You forgot that Iraq was clearly supporting Terrorism and Al Queda while Assad isn't.
Damn, that video ...
Can we finally send in the troops? US, Europe, Turkey?
So Syria does something that we accused Iraq of doing which led to the invasion, and we do what? Oh, yeah...
Do NOT watch the videos. Completely horrible.
And as always people claiming false flag attacks. Just because the SAA has had gains in the past months with the help of Iran and Hezbollah in some areas does not mean that the war is lost. That's not how war works.
As people have said it's more of a stalemate with the Rebels being pushed back in some areas but pushing forward in others and vice versa.
EDIT: The evidence looks strong for the attack but I found an question on Reddit that is interesting no matter what part you support (This is most likely from a Assad supporter as he has a little Syrian flag next to his username):
I have a little theory. Sectarianism. Maybe it has reached a boiling point that some Alawite Generals has seen it as a nescessity to find more fast ways to exterminate people.
Please share your insights with the rest of the thread. People can't guess your thoughts.The truth is quite obvious, people are just too brain washed to accept it.
The truth is quite obvious, people are just too brain washed to accept it.
1300 dead, holy fuck.
The truth is quite obvious, people are just too brain washed to accept it.
Why would assad use chemical weapons when he had just invited UN chemical weapon experts to Syria? And they are there? To investigate allegations that he used chemical weapons?
1300 dead, holy fuck.
What did you find confusing in it? It's a simple statement of fact. No where in the title does it bear responsibly on a party.Thread title is extremely misleading. Both the rebels and government have been accusing each other of using chemicals. Last I read, the UN found evidence to support the latter
Because that worked so well LOLSo Syria does something that we accused Iraq of doing which led to the invasion, and we do what? Oh, yeah...
So is this a red enough line?
So Syria does something that we accused Iraq of doing which led to the invasion, and we do what? Oh, yeah...
Hopefully not. We have no business intervening. Neither side deserves to "win."