Tulipanzo
Member
Casuals still like value, otherwise the WiiU would have been a runaway success.Good enough for the casuals
Taking an established piece of hardware, then chopping off its most compelling features is going to play poorly.
Casuals still like value, otherwise the WiiU would have been a runaway success.Good enough for the casuals
No idea what they are waiting for with this? You going to launch it along side the series x and confuse more people?
That's not a good thing at all! What happens when a game is 1440p and 30 fps on XSX?
Hitting the nail on the head.That's not a good thing at all! What happens when a game is 1440p and 30 fps on XSX?
Developers would have to take Lockhart into consideration day one which means that can't go too crazy with the game designthis is not how it works. This would mean that basically almost every game out there will be limited by NINTENDO SWITCH. Lol
And keep in mind, that one the best looking games at the Sony event was a cross-gen game: Kena.
Game development nowadays is very scalable. They are basically like PCs now and with SSDs its easier than ever. its not like back then, when we had CELL etc. where developing a game was a nightmare.
Devs can easily get the best out of XSX and just scale down to XSS, its not that hard, since they have the same architecture. Lower Resolution and you are done.
Just look at Flight Simulator - the best looking nextgen we've seen so far. And it's coming to Xbox One.
Everyone gets what they are willing to pay for on Xbox, they catered to the casuals and hardcore alike.make sense, trying something ground breaking is welcome
Imo the only difference is in the loss of gpu power, so lower res here and there.
No idea what they are waiting for with this? You going to launch it along side the series x and confuse more people?
That's not a good thing at all! What happens when a game is 1440p and 30 fps on XSX?
I guess they pretty much forget the parity bs.
Same as PC. Use lower resolution textures.
Amazing concern trolling from the Sony camp.
Microsoft doing everything right here. The most powerful console for bragging rights, and the cheapest for all parents out there who want to get their kids a fifa/cod machine.
Classic pincer move, that should make some headway into the Sony/MS sold machines ratio.
what do you think the new Assassin's Creed will run at on One S?
or Watch Dogs 3? or *insert every cross gen game here*
the One S will be supported for maybe a year after the next gen launches, and it would be supported anyways since that's how cross gen periods work.
lower the settings, lower the resolution to acceptable levels and lower the framerate from 60fps to 30fps if necessary.
Microsoft themselves are targeting 60fps for all their next gen titles, that's pretty much a given.
this also gives them a lot of room for downporting their games to Xbox One.
they now not only have the option to run the game at lower resolutions and settings but also half the framerate.
this is not only a gigantic reduction in GPU performance needed but also greatly reduces the needed CPU performance.
so porting a 4k60 Series X game to Xbox One should be absolutely no issue and at worst would mean a 900p30fps port.
seems obvious 810p / 900p - 30 fpsThat's not a good thing at all! What happens when a game is 1440p and 30 fps on XSX?
That's not a good thing at all! What happens when a game is 1440p and 30 fps on XSX?
MS is driven by money, not the love of games. I cant believe that people actually believed that last statement...useful idiots indeed.
But I think they do still need Velocity Architecture and SSD to make this work. Xbox fans were shitting on PS5's SSD for allegedly not going to be utilized properly in 3rd party engines because the Series X will be the baseline around which next gen I/O will have to be designed. Well, Series S better be able to match the X, or we're all getting shit on in terms of I/O engine design.
Yeah i am more talking about the name. I cant believe they are sticking with it. So I will have an Xbox one X and an xbox one series xIn that regards, I don't think that the existense of the consoles will confuse people. Their naming scheme however, that's horrible.
For example, I was at a store a couple weeks ago and they had an Xbox One S and and Xbox One X next to each other. The One X was on sale for 299. The pricetags were right next to each other.
So an Xbox One S and Xbox One X were next to each other, both for 299. Based on the naming of the consoles, it's not clear cut for a customer to know which one is better.
PS4 Pro being better than a PS4 is self-explanatory. I really don't like MS's naming of these consoles.
Lockhart to me seems like the new baseline for a PC to run Xbox series games. Minimum SSD and ability to utilise smart features like DLSS and VRS
MS is driven by money, not the love of games. I cant believe that people actually believed that last statement...useful idiots indeed.
It's nothing like that.
These are both the same system. Running the same OS, Same Software, Same game package.
Just one is more powerful. It will probably auto adjust and the devs won't need to do anything.
Fucking MS botching nextgen again. XSX is awesome but of course they have to fuck it all up by making that Lockhart shit as base for nextgen games.
Yup, but the console crowd needs some years to except this.Damn nVidia did great with the 2080ti, but they had to fuck it all by making a 2060, now I can’t play Cyberpunk 2077 with Ray Tracing grrr.
Why ? You have the Ssd, velocity achtitecture , the same cpu and gpu architecture... I don’t think it will be a big deal.Anyone telling you that 7.5 gigs of RAM, an underclocked cpu, and 4 tflop gpu wont effect game design is willfully lying, shilling, or purposely running interference for Microsoft. Im no tech expert, but i refuse to believe it.
Anyone telling you that 7.5 gigs of RAM, an underclocked cpu, and 4 tflop gpu wont effect game design is willfully lying, shilling, or purposely running interference for Microsoft. Im no tech expert, but i refuse to believe it.
They'll use checkerboarding or DirectML to get it to 4K. That's less intensive, and you'll see the difference BUT that's what you get with a $200 console.
Hitting the nail on the head.
UE5 and the MineCraft RT demo are already showing certain GPU techniques may lower resolutions on main hardware.
In these scenarios the Lockhart goes well below 1080p.
Not a good idea if it's less powerful then the Xbox One X... but I'm no businessman , so what the hell do I know?
translation: "I have no idea what I'm talking about but I know this can't be true!"
why don't you join the flat earth society, you'd fit in perfectly... they have the same mindset.
My guess, if I were to make a PC analogy:
Xbox Series X:
4K @ Very High Settings @ 60FPS
Xbox Series S
1440p @ High @ 30FPS |
1080p @ med @ 60fps
Xbox One X
1080p @ Med @ 30FPS
Xbox One S
900p @ low @ 30fps
So, it won't be so cheap. My guess from 300 - 350$
Good, a final nail in their co....ass i mean.
They already have the "Mostest Powerfullest Next-gen Console" and now they are going for the "Leastest Powerfullestest Next-gen Console".Not a good idea if it's less powerful then the Xbox One X... but I'm no businessman , so what the hell do I know?
.
xsx is kneecapped by xss for sure.
the only issue I see with the system if it's specs are like this is the RAM.
they need at least 12GB of ram to make sure One X enhanced titles can actually run on it.
if it can only run Xbox One games in base mode that would be a huge bummer. of course they would run much better than on base Xbox One but some games are locked to sub 1080p resolutions and 30fps modes where the One X versions offer way higher resolutions and/or 60fps, see Minecraft Dungeons for example, which indeed has both, a massively improved resolution and twice the framerate over the base version
That could be a valid concern, but everyone here seems to ignore the improvement in the pipelines. HDD vs SSD, GDDR5 vs GDDR6, memory bandwidth/speed, and a multitude of other new advanced software that will eclipse what the One X was capable of in every category.
trash. this needs to be 300 cheaper than the ps5 im not even talking about the series x, to be worth it
lord lolSo you want Lockhart to be a $400 machine then?