-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
This thread is officially really creepy looking now
- Thread starter weekend_warrior
- Start date
- Status
Well i did say MIGHT but the difference between that thread and this one is the fact that this thread is SFW (except for a few posters that tried to get it closed and failed) I really doubt that thread was closed because of a single poster. It was going to happen regardless.corkscrewblow said:
Ill just drop the subject now and go back to watching victorious. You have a justice avatar, go appreciate her.
T.M. MacReady
NO ONE DENIES MEMBER
yencid said:
It is incredibly pathetic that grown men watch Disney Channel programming to ogle teenage girls, then fill a thread with gifs from the episodes..
RustyNails
Member
I really, really avoid backseat modding but the idea is to NOT post pictures sexual in nature, like pics of women's asses or just tits. That's what got the yoga pants thread locked.yencid said:Well i did say MIGHT but the difference between that thread and this one is the fact that this thread is SFW (except for a few posters that tried to get it closed and failed) I really doubt that thread was closed because of a single poster. It was going to happen regardless.
Ill just drop the subject now and go back to watching victorious. You have a justice avatar, go appreciate her.
weekend_warrior
Banned
corkscrewblow said:
Because your posting off-topic pictures just to get the thread locked, idiot.
Who fucking cares if the yoga pants thread got locked anyway? Hot girl threads get started and locked on a regular basis. In a couple of days someone will start a "Why are white girls so skinny?" thread, which will turn into another ASS-GAF thread of big fat asses before it too gets locked. That's just how it goes. Get over it.
spindashing
Banned
.yencid said:
And corkscrew, no one said stay away from this thread, but at the moment, there isn't a lot of love here.
Mechanical Snowman
Member
I know you're baiting, but to offer some perspective: Gomez isn't even a year younger than me.TeethMummy said:
Don't forget that there are posters on here that were born after colour TVs were invented.
ShinobiFist
Banned
Most of the pics on this thread are usually face shots, don't see the beef. They can't stop The Gomez and Justice League Army. If they do, will start a Wizard, Victorious, iCarly etc....TV Thread. Basically, same thing we're doing here. Calm the fuck down folks.
nVidiot_Whore
Banned
Yeah figure it out GAF.
Images or animations of underage girls clearly meant for sexual purposes = OK.
Images of adult females in g-strings = LOCK/BAN.
Images or animations of underage girls clearly meant for sexual purposes = OK.
Images of adult females in g-strings = LOCK/BAN.
spindashing
Banned
nVidiot_Whore said:
Playing devil's advocate, but
Images or animations of adult girls clearly meant for sexual situations = OK.
Images of "under age girls" in g-strings = LOCK/BAN.
It's real sad THIS thread manages to exist while the others get destroyed due to posters posting more skin than what is allowed.
I don't make the gifs.nVidiot_Whore said:
I don't make the rules.
I have posted women above the age of 18 in this thread several times without breaking the rules and that is why I haven't gotten my shit slapped.
That's breaking the rules and those are the consequences.nVidiot_Whore said:
spindashing
Banned
It's alright, it's human nature to want to put the blame somewhere/on someone. I'm not defending all of the people in this thread but it's pretty funny. :lol
nVidiot_Whore
Banned
Medalion said:
The girls are all post-puberty; so while I don't find Ariana Grande to be jerk-off material if you do then by all means, fap away.
I just think it's odd this forum allows it.
I've run several forums, and any time someone would post something like this thread I'd be inundated with complaints from members.
Plywood said:
I know, I'm saying the rules are silly.
You should be able to post chicks in g-strings IMO.. that's seriously PG-13 material.
You shouldn't be allowed to oogle underage females and have an entire thread dedicated to pictures of them.
Or allow both I guess. I'm not that personally offended by this thread, just saying relative to a g-string'd adult female it's offensive.
nVidiot_Whore
Banned
Medalion said:
Yeah I have run forums that are mostly American members; and lots of Conservatives too for some odd reason.
I'm not complaining about this thread for the record; I'm just saying I find that this being allowed and normal "babe threads" not being allowed is strange.
If this forum has wide-spread age groups and a lot of international people.. making it more "liberal".. then why the banning of scantily clad adult females?
ShinobiFist
Banned
This.Plywood said:
Boards of Canada
Member
I looked at the last few pages of this thread wondering what the fuck it was. What the fuck?
Mechanical Snowman
Member
There's nothing explicitly sexual about the pictures posted in this thread, that's why it survives. That's the only reason. It's not hard to understand.
And the term 'underage' is being thrown around very unnecessarily; all of the main 3 or 4 girls posted in this thread are of legal age in most civilised places in the world, one of them is even of legal age to make a porn video and the rest are a year behind :lol
Seriously, such a stupid discussion.
And the term 'underage' is being thrown around very unnecessarily; all of the main 3 or 4 girls posted in this thread are of legal age in most civilised places in the world, one of them is even of legal age to make a porn video and the rest are a year behind :lol
Seriously, such a stupid discussion.
I imagine the TOS isn't created in consideration of the forum's user base, more the advertising. Also, professionals from the gaming industry post here, I doubt Evilore wants to risk the forum's reputation to potentially lessen the activity of industry insiders, which is what might happen if the OT section is full of soft core porn threads.nVidiot_Whore said:
RustyNails
Member
.Medalion said:
Um... Babe threads are aloud otherwise as soon as those threads where MADE they would have been closed. They get closed because people cant handle their hard on's and post pictures that would not get the thread closed.
If you went in to a Hot womans thread that was already under way and started posting those because you think its PG-13 it would get closed. And the longer the thread stays open the less clothe and the more skin they show.
If you went in to a Hot womans thread that was already under way and started posting those because you think its PG-13 it would get closed. And the longer the thread stays open the less clothe and the more skin they show.
spindashing
Banned
nVidiot_Whore said:
A few hours ago, I honestly believed that a "babe thread" could exist, but knowing GAF, that won't be possible. Someone will post a picture of a hot chick meandering on nakedness. People will complain. People will quote said picture asking for more/source/PMs. People will get similar pictures and post in said "babe thread." Lock.
I could see where you're coming from if this thread was filled with younger females in bikinis all over the place. G-strings, no matter how you slice it/rate it, are inching towards full nudity.
Honestly, I'm still here because the people that are regulars are hilarious people. I think I wouldn't bother with this thread if such a community did not exist.
X26 said:
If that was even true, would that even be a problem? An attraction to a post-pubescent woman is fine in my book, just don't act on it if she isn't legal.
For the record, I'm 21.
Mechanical Snowman
Member
I imagine that if we took a poll, you would be very wrong. But it's irrelevant anyway.X26 said:
nVidiot_Whore
Banned
Mechanical Snowman said:
They don't have nudity, but many are 100% meant to be sexual. Come on now.. that Arianna Grande snippet of her putting her ass into the air isn't sexual?
Now you are calling a g-string soft core porn?
Whose suggesting we allow soft-core porn?
Anyways.. this is like the 5th time I've started this discussion so I'll stop
Mechanical Snowman
Member
My bad, it was hyperbole, but my point standsnVidiot_Whore said:They don't have nudity, but many are 100% meant to be sexual. Come on now.. that Arianna Grande snippet of her putting her ass into the air isn't sexual?
Now you are calling a g-string soft core porn?
Whose suggesting we allow soft-core porn?
Anyways.. this is like the 5th time I've started this discussion so I'll stop
And yeah it's 'meant to be sexual', but in its original context it isn't, and she's fully clothed! Gifs posted here are almost exclusively taken from children's shows, obviously if they're suitable for that kind of TV then they're suitable for this forum.
:lol and for the record I'd be surprised if anyone was actually jerking it to the pics posted here, I come here for laughs more than fap material.
Anyway, you're right we should stop this talk
Edit: WHOA Visor, I've just checked the properties and, 12 megabytes? Is the site you used to upload free? I'd love to make uncompressed .gifs.
weekend_warrior
Banned
nVidiot_Whore said:
Is your name meant to be nVidiot, or an idiot?
You're asking why a thread that contains pictures of non-sexual, fully clothed, legally age-consenting young women survives, while threads that contain nothing but copious amounts of scantily clad woman (plenty of which that are "barely legal"), ass cracks, nipple slips, camel toes, "OMG fap fap fap", "NEED NAME!", etc etc, gets locked?
Best part about her existence is that it eventually lead to this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SMKISeG_wk
Best part of her existence is the NSFW pics of her that exist that blow my fucking-Saved-By-The-Bell-everday-watching mind.zlatko said:
Best part about her existence is that it eventually lead to this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SMKISeG_wk
And I'm 18, but nowhere near a huge poster in this thread. I just check in for the lulz. And oh this thread has provided lulz. Even GomezGAF has produced greatness in this thread, yet it only is the "Thank You Based God" gif. Still, great gif.
nVidiot_Whore
Banned
weekend_warrior said:
Come on now.. I'm talking about the images that ARE sexual.. unless you are going to tell me these weren't meant to be sexual:
And they are all of girls that were under 18 at the time. And while of "legal consent" in several states in the US, they are not of "legal consent" outside of their own age group, and images of them can't legally be used for any "sexual purposes" in this country.. clothed or not.
Like I said.. I am not personally offended.. and nothing here is illegal, or apparently rule breaking... I just find it odd that "sexualizing" under-age girls isn't against the rules here, as it is something that gets threads locked and people banned even at forums that allow nudity.
But I'll stop.. carry on..
MOST of the thread is just for lulz anyways.. you guys are getting all upset at me when all I'm discussing is the rules here.
And if those images are "Safe for work" for you.. I want to know where you work.
Mechanical Snowman
Member
OH MY GOD. GUYS. LOOK. GUYS. 14MEGABYTES.
This thread just got high definition.
This thread just got high definition.
spindashing said:
It was funny a few weeks ago, then people tried to shit this thread up. I felt sorry for the Gomezrialites, who though a little obsessive were funny as hell (actually the obsessiveness is one of the reasons I found it so funny). I tried to get into the LOLZ.
Then they started spamming other threads, so I felt less sympathy for them. It's all very childish really - if you don't like a thread, don't visit it. Don't post stuff in it to try and close it down. If you think it contains objectionable material, contact a mod.
Kinyou said:
Maybe you'd like just normal non-furred girls then?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UrQniuDLtc
Mechanical Snowman said:That's a curious fetish you've got friend. Though no judgement will be passed here.
Yes I have a certain obsession with dolls.
Thank you.
Plus most of the last pages have been "Waaaaaaah waaaaaaaah I don't like your cosplay, they're not up to my standards of pretty." Well I mostly posted them for myself. Whiners.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked