Well i did say MIGHT but the difference between that thread and this one is the fact that this thread is SFW (except for a few posters that tried to get it closed and failed) I really doubt that thread was closed because of a single poster. It was going to happen regardless.corkscrewblow said:Why would I get banned yet the several other people who have posted similar pictures didn't? The dude admitted he was trolling the yoga thread by posting pics of that whale and didn't get banned.
68 sir... 68Weenerz said:That yoga thread was much hotter in 8 page than this has been in 135. Pathetic.
yencid said:Ill just drop the subject now and go back to watching victorious.
I really, really avoid backseat modding but the idea is to NOT post pictures sexual in nature, like pics of women's asses or just tits. That's what got the yoga pants thread locked.yencid said:Well i did say MIGHT but the difference between that thread and this one is the fact that this thread is SFW (except for a few posters that tried to get it closed and failed) I really doubt that thread was closed because of a single poster. It was going to happen regardless.
Ill just drop the subject now and go back to watching victorious. You have a justice avatar, go appreciate her.
corkscrewblow said:Why would I get banned yet the several other people who have posted similar pictures didn't? The dude admitted he was trolling the yoga thread by posting pics of that whale and didn't get banned.
Im 19 and i enjoy the show, dont see how thats a problem ._.TeethMummy said:It is incredibly pathetic that grown men watch Disney Channel programming to ogle teenage girls, then fill a thread with gifs from the episodes..
.yencid said:Im 19 and i enjoy the show, dont see how thats a problem ._.
I watch anything i enjoy no matter my age. Ill probably be 60something and will still be watching cartoons.
Yea I know, Plywood and others definitely didn't do that in this thread. It's still standing, no one banned.weekend_warrior said:Because your posting off-topic pictures just to get the thread locked, idiot.
I know you're baiting, but to offer some perspective: Gomez isn't even a year younger than me.TeethMummy said:It is incredibly pathetic that grown men watch Disney Channel programming to ogle teenage girls, then fill a thread with gifs from the episodes..
I fucking love cartoons. <3yencid said:Im 19 and i enjoy the show, dont see how thats a problem ._.
I watch anything i enjoy no matter my age. Ill probably be 60something and will still be watching cartoons.
This, there's always someone who feels they need to push it to the next level and posts a bare ass/nips/whatever and thats what get's awesome pants threads closed.enzo_gt said:Plywood didn't post borderline nude pictures. THAT is what gets shit locked. Everything else is fair game, as much of this thread has been. That's the discrepancy.
nVidiot_Whore said:Yeah figure it out GAF.
Images or animations of underage girls clearly meant for sexual purposes = OK.
Images of adult females in g-strings = LOCK/BAN.
Hey, if you get off on them, I won't judge younVidiot_Whore said:Yeah figure it out GAF.
Images or animations of underage girls clearly meant for sexual purposes = OK.
Images of adult females in g-strings = LOCK/BAN.
I don't make the gifs.nVidiot_Whore said:Yeah figure it out GAF.
Images or animations of underage girls clearly meant for sexual purposes = OK.
That's breaking the rules and those are the consequences.nVidiot_Whore said:Images of adult females in g-strings = LOCK/BAN.
Medalion said:Hey, if you get off on them, I won't judge you
Plywood said:That's breaking the rules and those are the consequences.
There is a wide posting age range on this forum supposedly, and these girls are legal in most places 16+ , so it's legal for most people... people can complain or they can...ya know... stop coming to threads like this.nVidiot_Whore said:The girls are all post-puberty; so while I don't find Ariana Grande to be jerk-off material if you do then by all means, fap away.
I just think it's odd this forum allows it.
I've run several forums, and any time someone would post something like this thread I'd be inundated with complaints from members.
Medalion said:There is a wide posting age range on this forum supposedly, and these girls are legal in most places 16+ , so it's legal for most people... people can complain or they can...ya know... stop coming to threads like this.
This.Plywood said:I don't make the gifs.
I don't make the rules.
I have posted women above the age of 18 in this thread several times without breaking the rules and that is why I haven't gotten my shit slapped.
That's breaking the rules and those are the consequences.
I imagine the TOS isn't created in consideration of the forum's user base, more the advertising. Also, professionals from the gaming industry post here, I doubt Evilore wants to risk the forum's reputation to potentially lessen the activity of industry insiders, which is what might happen if the OT section is full of soft core porn threads.nVidiot_Whore said:If this forum has wide-spread age groups and a lot of international people.. making it more "liberal".. then why the banning of scantily clad adult females?
.Medalion said:There is a wide posting age range on this forum supposedly, and these girls are legal in most places 16+ , so it's legal for most people... people can complain or they can...ya know... stop coming to threads like this.
You should be able to post chicks in g-strings IMO.. that's seriously PG-13 material.
Medalion said:There is a wide posting age range on this forum supposedly, and these girls are legal in most places 16+ , so it's legal for most people... people can complain or they can...ya know... stop coming to threads like this.
nVidiot_Whore said:Yeah I have run forums that are mostly American members; and lots of Conservatives too for some odd reason.
I'm not complaining about this thread for the record; I'm just saying I find that this being allowed and normal "babe threads" not being allowed is strange.
If this forum has wide-spread age groups and a lot of international people.. making it more "liberal".. then why the banning of scantily clad adult females?
X26 said:As if the biggest posters ITT aren't in their mid-30's minnimum
I have the most post in this thread and I'm 20.X26 said:As if the biggest posters ITT aren't in their mid-30's minnimum
.spindashing said:Honestly, I'm still here because the people that are regulars are hilarious people. I think I wouldn't bother with this thread if such a community did not exist.
I imagine that if we took a poll, you would be very wrong. But it's irrelevant anyway.X26 said:As if the biggest posters ITT aren't in their mid-30's minnimum
Mechanical Snowman said:There's nothing explicitly sexual about the pictures posted in this thread, that's why it survives.
I imagine the TOS isn't created in consideration of the forum's user base, more the advertising. Also, professionals from the gaming industry post here, I doubt Evilore wants to risk the forum's reputation to potentially lessen the activity of industry insiders, which is what might happen if the OT section is full of soft core porn threads.
Too true. Some funny ass stuff in this thread.Honestly, I'm still here because the people that are regulars are hilarious people. I think I wouldn't bother with this thread if such a community did not exist.
so hotViperVisor said:How bout some Gomez in yoga type pants?
My bad, it was hyperbole, but my point standsnVidiot_Whore said:They don't have nudity, but many are 100% meant to be sexual. Come on now.. that Arianna Grande snippet of her putting her ass into the air isn't sexual?
Now you are calling a g-string soft core porn?
Whose suggesting we allow soft-core porn?
Anyways.. this is like the 5th time I've started this discussion so I'll stop
nVidiot_Whore said:Yeah I have run forums that are mostly American members; and lots of Conservatives too for some odd reason.
I'm not complaining about this thread for the record; I'm just saying I find that this being allowed and normal "babe threads" not being allowed is strange.
If this forum has wide-spread age groups and a lot of international people.. making it more "liberal".. then why the banning of scantily clad adult females?
yencid said:Too true. Some funny ass stuff in this thread.
Best part of her existence is the NSFW pics of her that exist that blow my fucking-Saved-By-The-Bell-everday-watching mind.zlatko said:
Best part about her existence is that it eventually lead to this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SMKISeG_wk
weekend_warrior said:You're asking why a thread that contains pictures of non-sexual, fully clothed, legally age-consenting young women survives, while threads that contain nothing but copious amounts of scantily clad woman (plenty of which that are "barely legal"), ass cracks, nipple slips, camel toes, "OMG fap fap fap", "NEED NAME!", etc etc, gets locked?
Mormon porn, no seriously google it.enzo_gt said:Okay bubbling is just wrong. Why the fuck do people do it? I see it on /b/ and it makes no sense to me at all, wtf is the purpose of it?
spindashing said:Honestly, I'm still here because the people that are regulars are hilarious people. I think I wouldn't bother with this thread if such a community did not exist.
I don't actually think there's a regular poster in this thread older than 24. Outside of the odd spy of course. I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Vox-Pop turned out to be a police mole...Mechanical Snowman said:I imagine that if we took a poll, you would be very wrong. But it's irrelevant anyway.
Kinyou said:
Mechanical Snowman said:That's a curious fetish you've got friend. Though no judgement will be passed here.
The lucky bastard!!yencid said:Back to my Agenda. More victorious
They live right next to each other.Jexemad said:The lucky bastard!!