It's time for that Far Cry 3 quote everybody quotes, ladies and gentlemen.
I'm genuinely surprised that after Dragon's Crown, Killer Is Dead, Senran Kagura, Dungeon Travellers 2 and probably a tonne of others that I've forgotten about (and I'll include Hatred in there for good measure, even though it's not otaku-aimed), game journalists keep doing the same thing and are continuiously disappointed that they all recieve the same outcome. You would have thought that they would have noticed the pattern by now:
1) Write editorial shitting on a otaku-aimed game X, making it seem like a far larger problem than a game that would struggle to sell more than 100k copies worldwide.
2) Include a sentence that reads "I'm not calling for X to not be made, but [description of how wonderful it would be if X was not made, making it blatantly obvious that the first half of the sentence is a lie]
3) Add window dressing to try to hide that you're shitting on X
4) Otaku get defensive.
5) Other people point out that the article is simply shitting on X
6) Writer in question is surprised by 4 & 5 happening.
7) There's a thread on NeoGAF which contains a bunch of people calling other people pedos and getting away with that scot-free
8) X gains a boost of popularity and pre-orders.
Everytime, the same outcome. And then the next plonker tries 1, 2 and 3, and is surprised that 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 happen, and the next, and so on and so forth.
There's two minor changes to the formula that been made here. The first is that X (in this case, Omega Labyrinth) isn't available to pre-order outside of Japan. We don't know if it's any good or not, we don't know if it's ever going to be localised etc. It's ultimately a fairly minor detail that reduces the number of pre-orders the game gets as a direct result of the article (for obvious reasons). The second is that the writer claims that he'll respect it more if it was outright porn, which is the most blatant lie I've seen anyone from the videogame press say in quite a while.
Ultimately, if you want shit to change, don't do the same damn thing. Instead of writing about how you want less of A, how about writing about how you want more of B instead? That way there, you do actively want more popularity and pre-orders for your subject.
(Cue a bunch of people making the "expose the bad thing" argument, which has been demonistrated in this case and all of the previous cases and likely all future cases that it just ends up in said bad thing getting more sales)