Again, the President of Finland
![]()
VR Porn.
Jaded? Nah. Completely pragmatic.
FFXV's showing on the later days at E3 impressed me enough to get on board. I'm definitely interested. But it's pragmatic to keep ones expectations below the map, especially for a game that is being touted as Japan's Duke Nukem Forever, in the off chance that you don't get burned.
I feel the same way about The Last Guardian. It could be good but it could also be a stinker based off its troubled development history.
Detroit looks fascinating to me. Something truly new, and is my third game of the show after Zelda and FFXV.
God of War, Horizon;etc I've played enough of those type of games to know I won't like those.
The best stuff on Sony's block weren't even showed at their conference. Stuff like Nier Automata.
The older you get, the more frugal and pragmatic you get with your buying choices. But a lot of gaf is BUY, BUY, BUY, where you have to like every single type of game. Despite my hand waving of Kojima's game for instance, I'm actually interested in it. But a boring CGI concept trailer of a naked man on a beach doesn't do much for me beyond giving me some man eye candy (which I admittedly liked a lot).
My initial post was a response to the idea that Sony unanimously "won" E3. For my tastes, I found Nintendo's lineup more enticing and will be using my 3ds a lot in the next year. That doesn't make me jaded. It makes me capable of separating what I like from what everyone else is hyping and not wasting my money. Wasting my money, now that's what makes me jaded.
Uh, you're buying Monster Hunter and Zelda and FFXV but you don't think you'll like Horizon... even though Horizon takes heavy inspiration from MH and inspiration from the same open world RPGs that Zelda and FFXV are inspired by.
You never watched the E3 demo, did you?
I mean, I liked the Horizon demo from what I played but saying someone should like something because it's derivative of other games isn't a strong point in its favour.
God of War, Horizon;etc I've played enough of those type of games to know I won't like those
Except he said:
No Pc option ?
There was one game that ruled them all.
That’s a bit dismissive. God of War and Horizon both have incredible potential. Definitely part of the new wave of gaming, but I dunno, I embrace the narrative driven story telling aspects of games just as much as the gameplay focused stuff from Nintendo. Been playing since Sega master system, and I really appreciate both. Horizon in particularly is getting praised for it’s fun gameplay though, looks like it’s going to deliver a fun experience to me.God of War, Horizon;etc I've played enough of those type of games to know I won't like those.
The older you get, the more frugal and pragmatic you get with your buying choices.
My initial post was a response to the idea that Sony unanimously "won" E3. For my tastes, I found Nintendo's lineup more enticing and will be using my 3ds a lot in the next year. That doesn't make me jaded. It makes me capable of separating what I like from what everyone else is hyping and not wasting my money. Wasting my money, now that's what makes me jaded.
Monster Hunter is a game series where there's little dialogue. Your reasoning for taking down monsters is to skin them, get loot, make new armor, take on new monsters with said armor, repeat. It's to take on new challenges with about a dozen different move sets and style of play as possible. It also has a friend component.
Horizon from what I saw is a guided open world game. It has Monster Hunter inspired large monsters to fight but it's not Monster Hunter in terms of design or loop. From what I saw it's another open world game placing emphasis on things that no longer interest me. Its Mass Effect styled dialogue wheel doesn't appeal to me in the least.
Comparing MH to Horizon doesn't stick with me, and saying that I should like Horizon because it has big dinosaur mechs to fight makes no sense and completely disregards why I like Monster Hunter (combat depth, slow and methodical controls where every hit matters, loot, customization, co-op).
GAF did by not crashing.
Nintendo, by virtue of blowing everyone the fuck out with the one game they brought
GAF did by not crashing.
I don't think Microsoft is getting any credit because they pretty much announced they have no exclusives anymore. So, if you vote for Microsoft for getting all these cool games coming out on PC, why wouldn't that vote go towards PC instead? PC has a better showing than Microsoft because they kept winning after their conference. I don't really even see the point in buying an Xbox, if they really have the plan to come out with a new console every other year BS. Just build a PC and upgrade through time, it would be more cost effective that way. I know the argument is that consoles are plug and play and in PC you have to download X and install whatever it is, but man, I'm not going to dish out $500 every 2 years when I can buy the game elsewhere.
I don't even own a PC, have no idea what TFLOP, TERAFLOP (Triceratops belly flop?), or whatever the fuck it's called is, but looks like I'll have to learn to play Microsoft games.
Wait what?GAF did by not crashing.
Clearly Zelda won.
Not Microsoft, Nintendo, or Sony. Just Zelda.
I voted Sony, but wow. Microsoft is way low, I expected it to be in second at the very least.
So, who have more fans contest? Or which console is more popular poll.
Servers stayed up during the whole period, so obviously everything was shit
Servers stayed up during the whole period, so obviously everything was shit