They didn't make as many movies in the 70's and 80's and they weren't as technically impressive as the older movies and they didn't have as high production values as the 90's stuff.DavidDayton said:I've always been of the opinion that the weak periods were the 70s and the post-Hunchback years. Otherwise the films were generally fairly decent...
I'm a bit puzzled by that... TLM, B&B, and Hunchback are all films which are much better than a) all of the 70s-Basil stuff, and b) are on par with some of the classic Disney stuff. The rest of the films I'll give to you, if you want them, but....
But they did contain much better animation. Rescuers, Fox and Hound and Basil has absolutely unequaled animation in some spots and retains a high standard throughout. The Black Cauldron isn't nearly as bad as it has been made out to be, although I'd still say it's the weakest from the period.
And above all, they are have much better narratives, much stronger characters, much more atmosphere, and you can really feel that unquantifiable sense of enthusiasm, genuine sweetness and love behind every cel.
The 90's movies are just showcases of brute force handicraft.
It's like the difference between a gothic cathedral, and a renaissance/baroque cathedral.
One is made with love, in genuine praise of something great. Build in harmonic and organic unison of the workers, craftsmen and designers (which were often one and the same person).
The second on the other hand, is made according to dogmatic rules, when faith in the common goal/lodestar (in this case God) was becoming phony, diluted and merely an establishment. Taking a language (in this case Roman/Greek architecture) whose words were blindly used without sense of their real meaning.