Gamepass as of now is 20m+. It was 18m on January, so the numbers should be higher by now. The price of gamepass is 10$-15$. On average, game pass is 10$ a month after 1$ and other stuff. 20m*10=$200mThey spend more on it than they make on it. Of course I don't KNOW this, but the opposite would surprise me greatly. Everyone always talks about what a great value it is, and it is. That value doesn't appear from thin air, someone is paying for it (it's Microsoft).
We’re talking about the Xbox division here, not MS as a whole.Do you guys think the biggest company in the world doesn’t make profits?
The SOC in the XSS is smaller and has higher yields per wafer. It also doesn't have a blu-ray drive. I would be interested to see just how much more the XSS costs to manufacture vs. wholesale cost.It's the exact same console aside from the GPU and less storage space
FY Revenue, in USD:
- Playstation: ~25 billion
- Nintendo: ~16 billion
- Xbox: ~15 billion
They all are doing great.
Xbox need, for this holliday:
- Xbox Series X: U$499,90
- Xbox Series X Digital: U$399,90
- Xbox Series S: U$249,90
yeah i think they're loosing a lot of money otherwise why not report it? if they're making money they would be bragging about it now, talking about the xbox division
Highly unlikely with the current market that we're in. The whole point of the Series S was to make a cheaper console from day 1 because this generations isn't going to see many, if any, cost reductions for the console makers. Even the PS4/XB1 generation hardware is still insanely priced for how old it is. There's next to no chance that MS can cut $100 off the price of a $299 console. Best you can hope for is bundled games and subscriptions.I think we are going to see a $199 series s
By this logic every division in MS that doesn't report profit to revenue is losing money, which is basically all the divisions.yeah i think they're loosing a lot of money otherwise why not report it? if they're making money they would be bragging about it now, talking about the xbox division
I am absolutely sure they are not profitable at this stage, not with just $15B revenue.They already publicly have said its a profitable division
What game is moving the needle and driving up Zenimax sales at this time?Good numbers overall, but I suspect a major portion of this increased revenue will come from the Zenimax revenue (that wasn't present in previous years). That's why it's more important than ever to have P&L statements and operating profit, instead of just revenue.
Very interested to see what % of new entry points xCloud is opening up for Xbox. Could give us insights into how fast the industry is evolving from traditional console experiences to streaming.
Gamepass is covering those expenses. They literally should not have to go out of pocket when Gamepass subscribers are footing the monthly bill.I am absolutely sure they are not profitable at this stage, not with just $15B revenue.
They could have been profitable a couple of years ago, but not now with all this rapid expansion of the division, the acquisition of Zenimax, and all these games in development pipeline.
There Series S has significantly less ram and it's quite a bit slower as well. 10GB, 8 of which is 224GB/s plus & 2GB @56GB/s vs 16GB 10 @562GB/s & 6GB @336GB/s. The Series S is not the same as the Series X, it's weaker all around, the CPU is basically the same because it had to be for performance, everything else that could be cut was which is fine it's an entry level console.It's the exact same console aside from the GPU and less storage space
Damn for all those concessions it's still hanging with the big boys.There Series S has significantly less ram and it's quite a bit slower as well. 10GB, 8 of which is 224GB/s plus & 2GB @56GB/s vs 16GB 10 @562GB/s & 6GB @336GB/s. The Series S is not the same as the Series X, it's weaker all around, the CPU is basically the same because it had to be for performance, everything else that could be cut was which is fine it's an entry level console.
It's not "more important than ever" to anyone here though lol. Do you think that MS execs don't know their profits and losses? Regular joe fanboy's on gaming forums don't ever need P&L statements and operating profit figures of the company that makes their favourite/most hated piece of plastic. Also what Zenimax games are recording massive revenue at this point exactly?Good numbers overall, but I suspect a major portion of this increased revenue will come from the Zenimax revenue (that wasn't present in previous years). That's why it's more important than ever to have P&L statements and operating profit, instead of just revenue.
Very interested to see what % of new entry points xCloud is opening up for Xbox. Could give us insights into how fast the industry is evolving from traditional console experiences to streaming.
More important than ever, because then we'll be able to see how much revenue Zenimax acquisition brought in and how much expenses it incurred. Otherwise, only higher 'revenues' after a big acquisition of another company is misleading at best. Of course, revenue will be up after you have acquired another big company.It's not "more important than ever" to anyone here though lol. Do you think that MS execs don't know their profits and losses? Regular joe fanboy's on gaming forums don't ever need P&L statements and operating profit figures of the company that makes their favourite/most hated piece of plastic. Also what Zenimax games are recording massive revenue at this point exactly?
xCloud will be a fraction of a percentage since it's barely available anywhere and is still in preview.
But you're not getting them, we know you're not getting them, and people need to stop feigning outrage when they don't get them and claiming that it means they're bad and being hidden.More important than ever, because then we'll be able to see how much revenue Zenimax acquisition brought in and how much expenses it incurred. Otherwise, only higher 'revenues' after a big acquisition of another company is misleading at best. Of course, revenue will be up after you have acquired another big company.
Besides, not anyone who is interested in financials and asking to see more information would be a fanboy or console warrior
xCloud: Yeah, absolutely, it'd be a small percentage. My point was that if they consistently reveal these numbers, we will be able to see a trend of how the industry is evolving/evolved and shifted from traditional gaming console experiences to cloud streaming. It'd be a nice case study.
1. I don't think this worth "outraging" about. I don't see people outraging and honestly they have no reason to "outrage". It's MS's choice whether to reveal those numbers or not. But people can definitely talk about it. That's well within their rights.But you're not getting them, we know you're not getting them, and people need to stop feigning outrage when they don't get them and claiming that it means they're bad and being hidden.
MS do not give a shit about console warriors demanding sales numbers on a sony-leaning game forum.
Microsoft as a company keeps going up and up and up in value. They still don't give console sales numbers. Value still goes up. The people that matter do not care about sales numbers for xbox or what percentage of new users are xcloud.
That’s why I hope they don’t get into VR.Let's hope that MS can actually transform into a viable competitor to Nintendo and Sony this gen. They seem to be making all the right moves...but will they stay the course and get distracted by some shitty fad?
But they stopped giving hardware numbers last generation. If hardware wasn't their future why release the XSX|S? Could it be they have more vectors to make money than consoles and their business model is different than the Japanese console makers?1. I don't think this worth "outraging" about. I don't see people outraging and honestly they have no reason to "outrage". It's MS's choice whether to reveal those numbers or not. But people can definitely talk about it. That's well within their rights.
2. MS as a company is doing excellent! But this is a gaming forum, so we are more interested in the Xbox division. Same goes for Sony / PlayStation. We'd be more interested in PlayStation numbers, despite how poor or good Sony as a whole or its other divisions are doing.
3. They don't have to give console sales numbers if they think hardware isn't their future.
Because (some) GAFers don't like to use their brains.But they stopped giving hardware numbers last generation. If hardware wasn't their future why release the XSX|S?
He will become game pass ambassador soon
Such intelligent and sensible post on gaf. What you doing bro? You not supposed to do that here. Only concerned trolling is allowed hereBecause (some) GAFers don't like to use their brains.
Microsoft don't need to provide number of consoles sold, because that number is telling just part of a picture, not whole picture. It's not that Microsoft is not interested in selling consoles. It's just for Microsoft consoles sold are just one part of their ecosystem. It's clear that they stopped releasing Xbox One number because they got pummelled by PS4, but their business changed. That's why Spencer said, that they won't disclose number if if they will outsold PS5.
Nintendo has to release number of consoles sold because their revenue stream is directly and only tied to number of consoles they have on the market. Same for Sony. Yes, Sony is starting to release their first-party on PC, but their business is 95% tied to consoles sales.
Microsoft on the other hand has an ecosystem that you can access from cloud, PC or consoles. They are releasing their first-party games on PC and cloud day one so it is logical, that shareholders does not care about number of consoles sold when it is just fraction of Xbox's revenue stream.
Gafers just want to know number of consoles sold so they can measure their dicks compared to PS5. But fact is that way Microsoft is conducting their business is different compared to Sony.
How many times has this guy said "Another One"??
Do you really think they can? This is Year on Year revenue. They have released a new console compared to last year so revenue is up. 32% YoY growth is expected this year but it would be hard to do that with no new console next year.32% YoY growth is steller
Hope to see if they can at minimum sustain that over the next few years
I am absolutely sure they are not profitable at this stage, not with just $15B revenue.
They could have been profitable a couple of years ago, but not now with all this rapid expansion of the division, the acquisition of Zenimax, and all these games in development pipeline.
Apple could easily eat. With their Apple Arcade and a decent Apple TV.
You Goddamn right!
I think Apple would eat from Nintendo the most. They can use the PS2 model. Where theres a game about every movie and show kids love within months. Doesnt even have to be a apple tv, it can be a iPod GameTouch. A iPod touch as a switch lite.Hmm. Apple would eat a chunk out of everyone (ms/sony/Nintendo) but I think they would need to basically create a robust way to all devs to port old games or emulate windows/bits of windows in a way that enables those games to run. I also think that they are going to have to change their story policies but that's more of a hope.
Great point until you actually read the financial report and realize that hardware is down 31%.Do you really think they can? This is Year on Year revenue. They have released a new console compared to last year so revenue is up. 32% YoY growth is expected this year but it would be hard to do that with no new console next year.
From the OP:Great point until you actually read the financial report and realize that hardware is down 31%.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!Why don't you contribute instead of being a little bitch?
Of couse Xbox is profitable at $15.4bn revenue.I am absolutely sure they are not profitable at this stage, not with just $15B revenue.
They could have been profitable a couple of years ago, but not now with all this rapid expansion of the division, the acquisition of Zenimax, and all these games in development pipeline.
It is actually around 10% no?Microsoft has not over 1/3 of their expenses attributed to just Xbox
It's not even third. Tencent is number 1 in the game industry now.Xbox have the best third place in the game industry... WHEN ?
45 bil is quarter number for MS and 15 bil is yearly number for Xbox. So not really 1/3All that shit combined is 2/3 and that small Xbox division is 1/3?
No.It's not even third. Tencent is number 1 in the game industry now.
45 bil is quarter number for MS and 15 bil is yearly number for Xbox. So not really 1/3
Of couse Xbox is profitable at $15.4bn revenue.
Microsoft as a whole company is just spending $45.8bn.
Microsoft has not over 1/3 of their expenses attributed to just Xbox.
They have, Azure, Office, Windows, Surface, LinkedIn, Dynamics, Github and other deloper tools, Bing, AI, Enterprise Services, Hololens, executive expenses, other research.
All that shit combined is 2/3 and that small Xbox division is 1/3?
Xbox is highly profitable. Just not as ridiculous like the rest of Microsoft.
probably this is why they are with Apple one of the few trillion-dollar companies ... while the others are belowEach Days, it's always the "Best" something at Microsoft
From the OP:
"Series X|S boosted hardware rev 92% YoY"
Are you illiterate or what?