Militant17
Member
Why are you posting this to me? Do you think i am a trump fan because of my comments when none of them have even remotely hinted that. I even said earlier in this thread that what trump is doing is disturbing and another perfect example of authoritarianism, i honestly fear what he is capable of doing. If you get wind of an official government new network starting up as part of his attack on "fake news" then it's time to pack your bags if your american. But i'm still puzzled why you reference me to that article in the first place.White House Bars Times and 2 Other News Outlets From Briefing
WASHINGTON Journalists from The New York Times and two other news organizations were prohibited from attending a briefing by President Trumps press secretary on Friday, a highly unusual breach of relations between the White House and its press corps.
Reporters from The Times, CNN and Politico were not allowed to enter the West Wing office of the press secretary, Sean M. Spicer, for the scheduled briefing. Aides to Mr. Spicer allowed in reporters from only a handpicked group of news organizations that, the White House said, had been previously confirmed to attend.
Organizations allowed in included Breitbart News, the One America News Network and The Washington Times, all with conservative leanings. Journalists from ABC, CBS, The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, and Fox News also attended.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/24/us/politics/white-house-sean-spicer-briefing.html
Oh definitely, but also one has to take into account the initial source of the outrage and it's validity. Now that we also know the author is guilty of making those same kinds of shitty jokes you have to ask yourself why this issue was brought up by him in the first place and what kind of agenda he was pushing. Like it maybe seems that the article was purely "clickbait" about (coincidentally) the biggest youtuber which designed to get a response from the reactionaries either positive or negative resulting in views. Who would've thought right. You have to ask what is the validity in the policing of humor especially when we find out the ones writing the story are guilty of the same thing.People are and always have been allowed to ostracize those who say or do disagreeable things, just like PDP's fans have a hard on over the thought of the WSJ being brought down for publishing the story in the first place, nor how they don't seem to care that jacksepticeye is getting shit on because he apparently didn't come out in full support of the Pewds. Speech and action can freely combat speech and action. It's fair dues to be kicked out of the house party if you're shitting in the punch bowl. Really, at this point you're arguing against a fundamental aspect of human socialization and communication.