Because those are things that people haven't already paid for in some other fashion, unlike XBL's paywall for basic online MP.People gladly pay for cell phone service, cable, internet, music, Netflix, etc. at far higher rates than PS+ or XBL.
Because those are things that people haven't already paid for in some other fashion, unlike XBL's paywall for basic online MP.People gladly pay for cell phone service, cable, internet, music, Netflix, etc. at far higher rates than PS+ or XBL.
Who builds and maintains the infrastructure? When a new internet feature needs to be added to the console, its up to the publishers?
No.... The publishers need to focus on games... That's it. The console manufacturer has to build the APIs and maintain the network. They hire the staff and the programmers.
People gladly pay for cell phone service, cable, internet, music, Netflix, etc. at far higher rates than PS+ or XBL. I just don't understand the reluctance to pay a very reasonable fee to the manufacturer so that they can maintain, support, and upgrade the online infrastructure.
They really need to switch the left analog into the dpad spot so you have clean access to the touchpad.
Because they're soulless and greedy corporations, unlike the mom and pop telcos, the cottage industry internet providers, and small independent media shoppes.People gladly pay for cell phone service, cable, internet, music, Netflix, etc. at far higher rates than PS+ or XBL. I just don't understand the reluctance to pay a very reasonable fee to the manufacturer so that they can maintain, support, and upgrade the online infrastructure.
Well, I don't think they did for NGP.Wait, people believe they won't even name the console tomorrow? Wut.
Wait, people believe they won't even name the console tomorrow? Wut.
Wait, people believe they won't even name the console tomorrow? Wut.
Well, I don't think they did for NGP.
This plausibly is exactly what happened with the source who subsequently passed on the pricing info to Kotaku. $429 makes zero sense in terms of pricing structure. The basic SKU will probably debut for $399 here in U.S.
what is the extra $100 of the Premium version?
what is the extra $100 of the Premium version?
Well, I don't think they did for NGP.
Just wanted to give you guys a heads up
All these Kotaku rumours are just BS . Dont believe in these things . Dont know why the site just hates SONY for like eons and isnt banned at Gaf
No , there is no plans for releasing an SKU above 500$. Last i heard , there was gunning for 470$ and a lower sku with 420$ price tag. SONY most probably upped the RAM in the final machine
I have some very concrete info but cant afford to lose my job as all these are just insider infos . Like i said PS4 was showcased to big investors last week . One thing could be right though the Xperia connectivity . But please dont believe in these BS
Good night and i am sure all of you will be happy with PS4 unveiling including the haters
I don't think their changing the name either, but I think they might keep the codename until E3.I'm pretty sure it's going to be PS4.
429 is the "tard" pack most likely. Not that I believe Kotaku on anything though. I bet Sony doesn't even have firm pricing plans as of yet.
Looking at the controller pictures, does anyone else think that the new triggers still look kind of crappy?
Yep, looks like some people on the design team really didn't want to change the triggers so they came up with this half-assed solution.
Why not? Because of the example MS set?
Sony tried being 'friendly' this gen (free online play, no proprietary memory) and it lost them a chunk of pennies. Why repeat the mistake?
To gain more market share. Free online with XGC and Party Chat would be a huge differentiator to the Durango.
I call BS on the 4 = death thingie in Japan. 4th Installment didn't kill the Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Megaman, Street Fighter or Resident Evil,I don't know how much away the 4 = death thing has on the culture in Japan, but would be out of question for them to have different names in different territories?
Maybe not since the MegaDrive/Genesis had different names. As well as the famicom/NESI don't know how much away the 4 = death thing has on the culture in Japan, but would be out of question for them to have different names in different territories?
Could someone explain how would their source know all of this? Being a developer and having a controller and a devkit is one thing, but knowing details like launch dates, pricing and plans for the online service.. wouldn't he have to be someone really high at SCEA? and even then I doubt more then a few people who make these decisions have all of this information
Because that infrastructure -- the one used to enable the actual online gameplay -- is (other than lobby functionality) peer-to-peer, doesn't go through the company's servers, and therefore has little to no bandwidth cost.
That's why it's free on PC and should always remain free.
They're not making you pay for something they provide... they're making you pay for something, just because they know they can make you do it if you want an essential feature.
Same with the utter silliness of charging an XBL fee to give you Netflix access. It makes no sense... the only cost to Microsoft, at worst, was for the development of that app. How does this justify putting it behind a paywall? It doesn't. It's just done because they can.
Wait, people believe they won't even name the console tomorrow? Wut.
if its not PLAYSTATION 4 Sony has already LOST
No nintendo charges 50 cent for kidsThank Microsoft and their paywall strategy. Nintendo probably feels foolish with their Wii U free to play solution.
Almost every gamer I've talked to expected the PS4 to have paid online.
They are finding it rather funny, it seems.
Hey kids, let's learn some Japanese.
What's April (4) in Japan?
"Shi"gatsu
----------------------
No one will call Playstation 4, "Playstation Shi".
Even if you want to say "4" in Japanese, there are tons of other ways to say it.
Stop that "4" taboo bs already.
*goes play some Devil May Cry 4*
Of course they do. They built the hardware to accommodate the pricing of the thing.
If by 'it' you mean 'money', you're correct, they haven't gotten 'it' in a long long time. Personally I hope they make a lot of money doing this because as gamers we're much better off when Sony is profitable.
Sounds like you're the one getting fucked buddy.
What? Gaming division has been profitable in 3rd and 4th quarter even though the Vita is not selling and PS3 sales are shrinking. The new Slim is highly profitable for them.
Nintendo waited until about 3 months from release to announce a price. Not sure why Sony needs to rush. Plenty of time to see if Microsoft shows their cards first.
High five!Gross, they better not. I like it the way it is.
if its not PLAYSTATION 4 Sony has already LOST