TatteredHat
Member
That Xbone screenshot really is something else.
This is tough! I can instantly tell that three of those are fully qualified for an editor position at Polygon, though.
Guess which one is XO.
That would require optimizations and probably concessions considering the PS4 is a good bit more powerful than XB.
So find Gravity in 3d instead. Sequence in CoD lasts around 5 minutes, is quite neat though.Man I dont want ghosts at all but I REALLY want to play that space sequence
PC and PS4 have the same colors. Xbox One adds sharpness and contrast to output video. To have the same colors in PC/PS4 just modify sharpness and contrast from your monitor/TV options.
At this point I could probably post a black screen and someone will say it looks better.
Have MS said they plan to remove it?Can't wait until that filter is removed completely.
Mind you I care more about the overall detail of an image, not the resolution or the frame rate.
What exactly is the point of this filter?
Why does FIFA look like hot trash on any system?
It's personal preference, there's no science to this. One has nicer colours, the other one has an obviously sharper image. Depends on what people care about, how far they sit from the TV, the quality of the TV - all kinds of shit.
Does this mean the Xbox would be WORSE at a higher res? Fuck no, of course not.
I am heavily bias with the PS4 but if Xbox plans to use their on the cloud feature for processing, then it would be an equal to the PS4 or even better.
Um, resolution makes up the detail. The Xbone filter obscures details via crushing any blacks/shadows in addition to less picture information.
I'm sorry but I would never ever want any game to look like that just to meet the preferences of people who seem to like what's going on in those xb1 screens.
D'aww!!That comments section:
I am heavily bias with the PS4 but if Xbox plans to use their on the cloud feature for processing, then it would be an equal to the PS4 or even better.
Man, that Forza 4/Forza 5 comparison wipe on the article is a real eye opener. Forza 4 actually seems to look better than it's sequel in a lot of ways. How does that even happen?
Yeah, CoD is a pretty poor point of comparison. They all look negligibly shit.call of duty just looks bad imho :/
It's just a terrible sharpening filter being applied to non 1080P games. There's a bug in ACIV going by the OT where it can actually disappear at times and look better. Plus games like Ryse use custom upscaling methods that ignore it. And if the comment in the OT saying BF4 doesn't use it either than it must be optional. Hopefully every developer chooses not to, or Microsoft fixes it.
Maybe I used the wrong term, I saw someone using that term today and decided to copy it.
I care most importantly about level detail, world detail, shaders, smoke, particles, I care about the overall image, I couldnt' give a shit if it's sub 1080p not in the least.
I just re-finished KZ 2 and 3 and both of those games look fucking tip top to me, still - pretty good world detail, admitedly a bit bland on the colour palette but the levels are fleshed out. Flat floors, flat walls but ultra crisp at 1080p? 4k? Couldn't possibly care less.
Preview/beta build with sharpening and contrast filter said:
Final retail version without the filter said:
They could just forego the filter then but in terms of performance is what I was answering with.
Can this be patched/improved on the XB1?
Lmao I'm dying over here.
Lol... Wait whut.That comments section:
Played a fair amount of both games on XBone. I definitely noticed the sharpening while playing COD, the game looks like ass overall, but I haven't noticed over-sharpening in AC4, I think the game looks fantastic and runs great, looks impressive.
IGN put up a comparison video of AC4 among Xbone and PS4 and they were virtually identical. Not sure I trust all the sources putting out this info. I believe there is a sharpening filter at work, but I don't think it has such a dramatic effect as some of these screenshots would have one believe.
Okay, what about tons of detail at 1080p?
Because that's totally possible on PS4 and PC games.
I'm sorry but I would never ever want any game to look like that just to meet the preferences of people who seem to like what's going on in those xb1 screens.
Depends on the detail I REALLY like my levels detailed, resolution does almost nothing for me.
If that means 900p even on PS4 but even better shaders, even more polygons, better quality textures? ............
I'd love resolution, I'd love 4k but honestly, to me world detail is THE most important thing by far.
Isn't this shot taken from the framebuffer or whatever the term is? Both the images represent what's sent to my TV? One looks more washed out than the other.
The AC4 shot is interesting, look at the tree which has it's leaves obscurring the water near the boat, somehow the PS4 shot actually looks more jagged there than the Xbox One, I don't know OR CARE what the filter is being used for that bit but honestly it looks better to me as do the overall colours of the shot.
Mind you I care more about the overall detail of an image, not the resolution or the frame rate.
Depends on the detail I REALLY like my levels detailed, resolution does almost nothing for me.
If that means 900p even on PS4 but even better shaders, even more polygons, better quality textures? ............
I'd love resolution, I'd love 4k but honestly, to me world detail is THE most important thing by far.
Isn't this shot taken from the framebuffer or whatever the term is? Both the images represent what's sent to my TV? One looks more washed out than the other.
The AC4 shot is interesting, look at the tree which has it's leaves obscurring the water near the boat, somehow the PS4 shot actually looks more jagged there than the Xbox One, I don't know OR CARE what the filter is being used for that bit but honestly it looks better to me as do the overall colours of the shot.
Mind you I care more about the overall detail of an image, not the resolution or the frame rate.
Maybe I used the wrong term, I saw someone using that term today and decided to copy it.
I care most importantly about level detail, world detail, shaders, smoke, particles, I care about the overall image, I couldnt' give a shit if it's sub 1080p not in the least.
I just re-finished KZ 2 and 3 and both of those games look fucking tip top to me, still - pretty good world detail, admitedly a bit bland on the colour palette but the levels are fleshed out. Flat floors, flat walls but ultra crisp at 1080p? 4k? Couldn't possibly care less.
The gap between the PS3 and the PS4 is astounding. The PS3 shot looks more like a space toilet than a space station.PS3
360
Xbone
PS4
Depends on the detail I REALLY like my levels detailed, resolution does almost nothing for me.
If that means 900p even on PS4 but even better shaders, even more polygons, better quality textures? ............
I'd love resolution, I'd love 4k but honestly, to me world detail is THE most important thing by far.
OK, so here's an example of what the sharpening filter is doing to XB1 games. Both images below are of Battlefield 4 on XB1, upscaled to 1080p from 720p:
Just fuck with your TVs sharpening and contrast until games look the way you feel pop.
A black-crushed, ultra-sharpened mess?I honestly don't even know what "that" is?
IGN put up a comparison video of AC4 among Xbone and PS4 and they were virtually identical. Not sure I trust all the sources putting out this info. I believe there is a sharpening filter at work, but I don't think it has such a dramatic effect as some of these screenshots would have one believe.
I can't deny the jaggies are definitely more obvious in the first, darker shot - but the colours / contrast are (yet again) nicer.
Actually switching back and forth between the 2 shots and looking at the whole damn image, rather than focusing on a good jaggie point? Nope prefer the darker shot (First one)
Can see a bit more detail in a few things too.
or wait, am I agreeing with you and you are saying the first one is better?
I can't deny the jaggies are definitely more obvious in the first, darker shot - but the colours / contrast are (yet again) nicer.
Actually switching back and forth between the 2 shots and looking at the whole damn image, rather than focusing on a good jaggie point? Nope prefer the darker shot (First one)
Can see a bit more detail in a few things too.
The question you were responding to seemed to be asking about the terrible sharpening effect.