Getting us ready for Destiny.
I've never played Call of Duty, you might have to go a little more in-depth with me.
Dog hair is coming in a patch according to Andy (Nvidia rep).
I can't tell if this is a joke or not. Are they really patching in dog hair? Amazing if true. Not the dog hair, the fact that it's something that has to be patched in later.
Is that from a DF capture? Dat black crush...Game looks pretty rubbish overall.
I can't tell if this is a joke or not. Are they really patching in dog hair? Amazing if true. Not the dog hair, the fact that it's something that has to be patched in later.
It will be a $5 DLC.Maybe. Probably.
In a forthcoming game update, NVIDIA GPU-accelerated animal fur, and NVIDIA GPU-accelerated PhysX effects.
- NVIDIA GPU-accelerated animal fur will add high-quality, realistic, dynamically-reacting fur to Riley, NPC wolves, and multiplayer attack dogs.
- NVIDIA GPU-accelerated PhysX will add realistic, dynamically-reacting particle effects throughout the game, dramatically enhancing their appearance.
I'm pretty sure it's from a "GIF" which tend to add compression to reduce file sizeIs that from a DF capture? Dat black crush...
from extinction. didn't even have mypad plugged in.360
pretty obvious rush job
How can the devs blatantly lie and force people to upgrade, makes me sick. BF4 it is then.
from extinction. didn't even have my 360 pad plugged in.
pretty obvious rush job
Quoting myself from the official source: http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/call-of-duty-ghosts-definitive-pc-version-available-now
Do you know release date for that patch?
About memory requirement, Black Ops 2 demands 3 GB one year ago and uses < 1 GB. Nobody complain then.
Ghosts can use 2.7 GB and every other program running in a pc can use more memory than 12 months ago version.
I see no madness in the 6 GB requirement.
Guys, the minimum system reqs are wrong, My friend is playing as we speak, while only having HD6770 and the minimum claims to be a HD5870.
Guys, the minimum system reqs are wrong, My friend is playing as we speak, while only having HD6770 and the minimum claims to be a HD5870.
Nobody complained (taking your word for it), probably because 3 GB was pretty standard 1 year ago and it was not forcing many people to upgrade for no real reason.
And I don't know, was the situation the same? If you had 2 GB for example, did the game run with more stuttering, or was it set to not even launch like it is now?
Demanding 6 GB when using less than 2, and not even attempting to run the game? This is just ridiculous and pretty much a fraud the way I see it.
Saying that "other apps may be eating up too much memory" is such a nonsensical excuse, didn't chrome or firefox eat up GBs like breakfast a year or two ago? Why didn't other games demand 6-8 GB 'just to be sure'?
Quoting myself from the official source: http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/call-of-duty-ghosts-definitive-pc-version-available-now
So they're using the same tech as the Witcher 3 showed off? (PsyX)
Ghosts doesn't use < 2GB. People are reporting confusing numbers. You can found users with out of memory errors and application in the 3 GB zone.
Yeah, I'm seeing a 6 GBs video memory usage for example.
The minimum spec is just a DX11 card.Guys, the minimum system reqs are wrong, My friend is playing as we speak, while only having HD6770 and the minimum claims to be a HD5870.
Oh, it uses close to 2-3 GB of (system) RAM but at the same time it seems to fully saturate all the VRAM which is available on a system.So ... it does now use more than 2GB of ram ?
360/PS3 versions are only 6v6 MP and no ground war
wait are you serious?
More VRAM than I expected...Oh, it uses close to 2-3 GB of (system) RAM but at the same time it seems to fully saturate all the VRAM which is available on a system.
This is probably a result of using the old engine without proper streaming capabilities because its running ok even on 2 GB cards while consuming all the 6 GB on Titans. Thus it's not really needed but it does seem to use it if you have a lot of VRAM.
Oh, it uses close to 2-3 GB of (system) RAM but at the same time it seems to fully saturate all the VRAM which is available on a system.
This is probably a result of using the old engine without proper streaming capabilities because its running ok even on 2 GB cards while consuming all the 6 GB on Titans. Thus it's not really needed but it does seem to use it if you have a lot of VRAM.
This may be a bug in the RTSS monitoring though. Need to check this out a little bit more.Interesting. Unless their using some bizarre streaming god knows what ... I mean, WTF is going on there lol ?
Dont worry, pirates figured out how to bypass the fake hardware requirements. Theres also a FOV tool as well for multiplayer now.
Wow...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-A0VEG5KOo&feature=youtu.be
Holy shit, lmao.
So basically they are filling the RAM up with absolutely nothing in order to move a bunch of variables outside of the 32bit address range as a form of anti-cheat. This is so bloody backwards.
This is what happens when consumers continue to support companies like this.
I still wonder why this game needs so much RAM when it only uses 2GB.He made a followup. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXwT1Bilgvk