Unregistered007
Banned
an insult to one of the best games on next gen systems.
My guess is that they ran some kind of script over the game assets which automatically reduces the resolution of every single texture and the polygon count of every single model to like 10% of the original fidelity. It's probably called Wii_Version.bat or something.fizzelopeguss said:Rather than create new assets they've just nuked the texture resolution and ripped chunks of polygons off the characters and environs.
Unregistered007 said:an insult to one of the best games on next gen systems.
JetSetRadio said:This can only look good for those who just woke up from an 8 year coma.
Vorador said:
I don't know how they managed to make it look far worse than COD 2 on the cube but they did. What a mess.
AniHawk said:Halo came out 8 years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NriQbh6nj4E#t=1m30sLuigiv said:pics
Is it a well known fact that grandma's can't spell?spyshagg said:Some place in America a grandma is saying "this looks exquisite - BOUGTH"
[Nintex] said:Is it a well known fact that grandma's can't spell?
[Nintex] said:Is it a well known fact that grandma's can't spell?
Frencherman said:In such a situation I feel helpless, because I don't know how to show those developers in that they're doing it wrong. So frustrating that it's going to sell anyway.
No kidding, such games are killing the very rest of positive attitude that coregamers have towards the wii....
Inspired by yesterday's DMC4 "PSP version" thread aye? :lolbig_z said:can someone with the pc version run it at the lowes res possible with all the effects turned off or lowest settings? just wondering how it compares.
That rocket appears to be powered by fairy dust:lolLuigiv said:
Nintendo Magic(tm)sjt333 said:That rocket appears to be powered by fairy dust:lol
Frencherman said:In such a situation I feel helpless, because I don't know how to show those developers in that they're doing it wrong. So frustrating that it's going to sell anyway.
No kidding, such games are killing the very rest of positive attitude that coregamers have towards the wii....
World at War on Wii ran terribly with loads of framerate drops. Maybe they thought it'd be better to make it look WORSE than World at War but at a higher framerate?Stoney Mason said:I sort of hinted at that in the original Wii thread when the game was annouced. Like I said I'll wait for a final judgment to see it in motion but it's hard to recommend that anybody buy the game in the current state. Unlike a lot of GAF boycotts this is one I could actually get behind because that just looks absolutely lazy from those screens. Better not to bring it over in that instance.
I am legit curious to see it in motion though. My brain says it must be butter smooth if it looks like that but a small part of my brain that wants the lulz wonders if it runs as bad as it looks.
Yaceka said:World at War on Wii ran terribly with loads of framerate drops. Maybe they thought it'd be better to make it look WORSE than World at War but at a higher framerate?
If this isn't running at a stable 30fps or better, I'm not buying this shit. It's fucking embarrassing on their part.
Stoney Mason said:I sort of hinted at that in the original Wii thread when the game was annouced. Like I said I'll wait for a final judgment to see it in motion but it's hard to recommend that anybody buy the game in the current state. Unlike a lot of GAF boycotts this is one I could actually get behind because that just looks absolutely lazy from those screens. Better not to bring it over in that instance.
I am legit curious to see it in motion though. My brain says it must be butter smooth if it looks like that but a small part of my brain that wants the lulz wonders if it runs as bad as it looks.
:lol :lolStormwatchGR said:I think it will look OK as long as you play it on an under-2inch display
the guy on the ground so much more detailed than the soldier. he almost looks chopped in lolCaptain N said:
Dizzan said:Probably shouldnt have released these on the day we've been drooling over some of the PS3's best first party titles.
OnPoint said:Would it be a boycott if nobody was intending to buy it in the first place?
Did you just call Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare a generic FPS, you'd better run for the hills and don't look back. And although I'm a Wii supporter, yes this game is better on HD systems. It's nice to know what you're shooting at you know...Agalloch said:Hei really?
generic fps are better on hd ?
But i don't like the genre, expecially with a gamepad,
one time i try Timesplitters 2 on gamecube cause some people say it's a masterpiece,
put it on the trash after 2 levels and back to play Metroid.
i need mouse/keyboard or wiimote for this genre, but it's boring and repetitive,
too many generic fps, need some action-platforming, rpg and more blue skyes and boss battles (yes i start play games in the early eighties and yes, don't know english grammar)
Pretty sure these games actually have the same developer.Teknoman said:Just for comparison sake:
Call of Duty 2 Xbox 1
Call of Duty 2 Cube
Souldriver said:In my mind I love how a scenario would play out if Activision crapped out this eye sore and Nintendo says "You know what? No, just no. Come back when you've made a game".
Who would lose more? Nintendo for it's reputations with developers/publishers? Or Activision because they lost a ticket to easy money? And would Activision put more effort in the game, or would they get bitter as well and threat the Wii console even more as a step child.
I know there is 0% change of anything even slightly similar to that happening though.
[Nintex] said:Did you just call Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare a generic FPS, you'd better run for the hills and don't look back. And although I'm a Wii supporter, yes this game is better on HD systems. It's nice to know what you're shooting at you know...