He should team up with Josh Trank to write a book on how to ruin your career as a director.
lol, seriously.
He should team up with Josh Trank to write a book on how to ruin your career as a director.
I don't know?
Nope? So is Heimdall also a nope to you? Or is it only bad when white people portray the mythical gods of another culture in a fantastical movie.
Heimdall being black is a part of the tongue in cheek current that runs through the Thor film. It is a deliberate play on his appearance in Norse mythology, where he is described as 'whitest of the gods'. So, based on the nature of the film itself, it is not an arbitrary choice, unlike the case of this film, where the race of the actors plays no such narrative role, at least that I can see.
It is also subversive, given that it reverses the dominant trend of having white actors portray people of colour, which is representative of the white oppression of people of colour. When this dynamic is reversed, and such a reversal is welcomed, this should reveal the artificiality of racialising film characters, i.e. claiming that they must be of a given race. When we combine this with the scarcity of this 'reverse whitewashing' and the preponderance of 'whitewashing' we should then see that the scale and imbalance is the problem, and not any single incidence of this. White people playing characters that we would think should be people of colour is not a problem in itself. It is a problem because of its scale, and because it is part of the wider issue of the oppression of people of colour.
Ooooooooooooooooooaaaaa...is this where Kung Pow's French Alien Pyramid joke came from?
Lock a critic in a room with a movie no one has even seen and they will not know what to make of it. Because contrary to what a critic should probably be they have no personal taste or opinion, because they are basing their views on the status quo. None of them are brave enough to say 'well I like it' if it goes against consensus."
I do think it's unfair to lay the blame solely on his feet when Lionsgate probably had some say in the casting. Especially considering he is ethnically Egyptian, critics should solely put out the movies flaws - not something out of his control.
Was anything preventing him from saying anything though? Even Ridley Scott tried standing up for himself as fas as casting for Exodus went
Proyas, the director of The Crow, Dark City and I, Robot, said: The process of casting a movie has many complicated variables, but it is clear that our casting choices should have been more diverse. I sincerely apologise to those who are offended by the decisions we made.
Lionsgate added: We recognise that it is our responsibility to help ensure that casting decisions reflect the diversity and culture of the time periods portrayed. In this instance we failed to live up to our own standards of sensitivity and diversity, for which we sincerely apologise. Lionsgate is deeply committed to making films that reflect the diversity of our audiences. We have, can and will continue to do better.
In this instance we failed to live up to our own standards of sensitivity and diversity
Man, he really comes across like an insolent little shit here. What happened to him?! Dark City and I, Robot were so great.
How has one thing anything to do with the other? Also, in the age of Social Media, people give too much credit to meltdowns.
Had Facebook been around since the 60s, i'm sure they would've been a tradition, by now.
I don't care to defend Proyas nor his movie, but anyone can have a mental breakdown, especially after their big project failed so hard and you see the world collective shit on it happily.
People go into meltdowns for less.
Honestly, the truth is the Internet just feeds off this shit, at this point.
I like how he glosses over white washing as if it didn't happen. No, bruh, it happened, and everyone knows it. :v Ultimately though, casting the appropriate actors isn't going to save a shit movie.
EDIT: And looking at the comment duckroll posted, that he flipped his own switch to complain about PC culture tells me that he was just engaging in PR culture am I right
I think Proyas just really thought he made a masterpiece that was overshadowed by the casting.
Like, he's just tone deaf to the nth level.
I think Proyas just really thought he made a masterpiece that was overshadowed by the casting.
Like, he's just tone deaf to the nth level.
I suppose I can see that - no director, at least soon after release, is going to say "jeez, I sure fucked up didn't I"
Was anything preventing him from saying anything though? Even Ridley Scott tried standing up for himself as fas as casting for Exodus went
Fantastic Four released in the US on August 7 2015....
I don't care about any of his movies, including this one. I'm more interested in people who refer to Facebook as "Facebook.com". I think this is the first time I've ever seen anyone refer to it as such, and it looks so strange to me. It'd be like saying 'I was able to find x on Google.com'. Is this something common, or is it as unnatural as it feels to me?Proyas embarked on a lengthy rant at critics on Facebook.com, accusing them of not "thinking for themselves" and simply giving his film a bad review because everybody else had.
But these guys are the leads of a movie about Gods of Egypt
But then you go to the muesum and the Gods are painted like....
I really wish people would stop using "tone deaf" as some catch-all phrase for something vaguely bad about a person. What are you even trying to say? Why not use actual, specific phrases with meanings related to the point you're trying to make?
Why do people keep saying this movie is white washed? Look how many black people are in this scene.
https://youtu.be/3kkS_JDBg3Q
I don't see what's wrong with this. While I get the white wash accusations. This movie is not made for educational puoposes nor is it what is asked of Hollywood.
I don't get how the color of the actors skin is erasing all enjoyment one could have for a action/fantasy movie with a Egyptian skin applied to it.
while I think it's good to have the discussion about Hollywoods whitewashing, I don't think it should be leading to dragging down a movie just because of it.
I'm not going to waste my time on this movie, because the trailer made it out to be a shallow action piece, but not because of historical incorrectness.
Its not hard to understand
Proyas thinks he legit made a good movie. He is attacking critics not because they rightly criticized his work, but because he thinks theres a cloud of political correctness over the casting made. Ie he is tone deaf to the criticism.
Is that better? While Im here do you want me to spell out anything else for you?
No, that was great. Keep using descriptive sentences like that in the future, and you'll enter into the amazing world of actually being able to communicate ideas and information.
As to your actual point now that you've described it, I'm sure plenty of reviewers did bandwagon onto the hate, because we're cruel social animals, and I think his complaints about reviewers hold some possible weight in general. But in this case, they're glomming onto a real social issue, so he's more a victim of hitting against a meaningful zeitgeist than overwrought political correctness, at least in my opinion. Regardless, the movie looked like straight ass, and all these points were already agreed upon in the first page.
It's a problem because it means fewer jobs for non-white people.
Question, MLK Jr. played by a white man - problematic?
LMAO.
"Could it be that I made a crappy movie?"
"No, it's the critics who are wrong."
Both based on a great comic the Carnival of Immortals. (Truly great art and story.)It was also a video game
Ayyy, this is like that thread about CGI that looked shitty for its own time. What the hell is this monstrosity?
Gerard Butler is like the Jar Jar Binks of this movie. If you replaced him with someone more appropriate the movie would still look like total shit but it's a quick and easy criticism for people to latch onto.
Or just maybe not make a movie about Egyptians at all, which is usually the result.
I think they're probably just shitty movies, and that shittiness has nothing to do with the color of the actors skin.
Ayyy, this is like that thread about CGI that looked shitty for its own time. What the hell is this monstrosity?
Lmao what a sore loser
Take it from me man, just take the L and move on
Gerard Butler fucking sucks though. Someone here pointed out his Rottentomatoes page a while back, it really is an eye-opener.