• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Gods of Egypt director has meltdown on Facebook, critics are "deranged idiots"

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZehDon

Gold Member
tumblr_myrb6jMUUi1qcjfvvo1_r2_500.gif


Oh, how the mighty have fallen.
 
I don't know?

You don't see the difference between the pantheon of a black and brown society being a bunch of white people that look nothing like them (except the protagonist of course) and the creative license to include one black guy in a Thor movie? Not even a bunch of black guys. Did Idris Elba play Thor, Loki or Odin? There's creative license and making a point. This movie is making a point.
 
Nope? So is Heimdall also a nope to you? Or is it only bad when white people portray the mythical gods of another culture in a fantastical movie.

Heimdall being black is a part of the tongue in cheek current that runs through the Thor film. It is a deliberate play on his appearance in Norse mythology, where he is described as 'whitest of the gods'. So, based on the nature of the film itself, it is not an arbitrary choice, unlike the case of this film, where the race of the actors plays no such narrative role, at least that I can see.

It is also subversive, given that it reverses the dominant trend of having white actors portray people of colour, which is representative of the white oppression of people of colour. When this dynamic is reversed, and such a reversal is welcomed, this should reveal the artificiality of racialising film characters, i.e. claiming that they must be of a given race. When we combine this with the scarcity of this 'reverse whitewashing' and the preponderance of 'whitewashing' we should then see that the scale and imbalance is the problem, and not any single incidence of this. White people playing characters that we would think should be people of colour is not a problem in itself. It is a problem because of its scale, and because it is part of the wider issue of the oppression of people of colour.
 

stufte

Member
Heimdall being black is a part of the tongue in cheek current that runs through the Thor film. It is a deliberate play on his appearance in Norse mythology, where he is described as 'whitest of the gods'. So, based on the nature of the film itself, it is not an arbitrary choice, unlike the case of this film, where the race of the actors plays no such narrative role, at least that I can see.

It is also subversive, given that it reverses the dominant trend of having white actors portray people of colour, which is representative of the white oppression of people of colour. When this dynamic is reversed, and such a reversal is welcomed, this should reveal the artificiality of racialising film characters, i.e. claiming that they must be of a given race. When we combine this with the scarcity of this 'reverse whitewashing' and the preponderance of 'whitewashing' we should then see that the scale and imbalance is the problem, and not any single incidence of this. White people playing characters that we would think should be people of colour is not a problem in itself. It is a problem because of its scale, and because it is part of the wider issue of the oppression of people of colour.

This is a great response, thanks!
 

duckroll

Member
I've actually watched this movie, and the latent racism in the casting is absolutely there. It's hard to say how much of it is intentional and how much is just being totally tone-deaf, but it's hard to argue that it is there when the biggest problem isn't that the main cast are all white dudes in a movie called Gods of Egypt. The problem is much deeper and it is everywhere.

Thoth is a really inane character, and being the only black representation among the named characters really makes it feel much more insulting. He's the "God of Wisdom" and the film repeatedly hammers it in that he's the wisest and smartest of all the gods. He also repeatedly reminds the audience and other characters of this because he is supposed to be a total egomaniac obsessed with his own superior intellect. Yet when they finally bring him on the mission for the one purpose they needed him for - his wisdom, he fumbles like a fool trying to answer the Sphinx's riddle, and only gets it right after being reminded by the white mortal lead to "stop thinking like a god". What a fucking joke. His only other role throughout the movie besides being insufferable is in the opening and ending scenes where he, as this supposedly wise teacher character, participates in the coronation ceremony of Jamie Lannister and endorses him as the One True King.

There's one other black character of minor importance in the plot. She's the other half of a set of twin warriors serving under Leonardis and his 300. Her sister is white. They both ride giant serpent mounts, one white, one black. Get it? Hurr hurr.

The rest of the brown and black people throughout the film are extras in the crowd, especially the dirty and simple peasant class people. They are just there to celebrate the greatness of Jamie Lannister. The movie also ends with a black peasant girl keening in reverence before the great and mighty Jamie Lannister as she offers him his missing eye, while he poses triumphantly, being very proud of the fact that he saved "his" people.
 

eso76

Member
Lock a critic in a room with a movie no one has even seen and they will not know what to make of it. Because contrary to what a critic should probably be they have no personal taste or opinion, because they are basing their views on the status quo. None of them are brave enough to say 'well I like it' if it goes against consensus."

I think he has a point here though, at least with some of them.
Regardless of how much the movie may suck (never seen or heard anything about it)
 

diamount

Banned
I do think it's unfair to lay the blame solely on his feet when Lionsgate probably had some say in the casting. Especially considering he is ethnically Egyptian, critics should solely put out the movies flaws - not something out of his control.
 
I do think it's unfair to lay the blame solely on his feet when Lionsgate probably had some say in the casting. Especially considering he is ethnically Egyptian, critics should solely put out the movies flaws - not something out of his control.

Was anything preventing him from saying anything though? Even Ridley Scott tried standing up for himself as fas as casting for Exodus went
 

duckroll

Member
Was anything preventing him from saying anything though? Even Ridley Scott tried standing up for himself as fas as casting for Exodus went

He did actually: http://www.theguardian.com/film/201...or-and-studio-apologise-for-lack-of-diversity

Proyas, the director of The Crow, Dark City and I, Robot, said: “The process of casting a movie has many complicated variables, but it is clear that our casting choices should have been more diverse. I sincerely apologise to those who are offended by the decisions we made.”

Lionsgate added: “We recognise that it is our responsibility to help ensure that casting decisions reflect the diversity and culture of the time periods portrayed. In this instance we failed to live up to our own standards of sensitivity and diversity, for which we sincerely apologise. Lionsgate is deeply committed to making films that reflect the diversity of our audiences. We have, can and will continue to do better.”
 
I like how he glosses over white washing as if it didn't happen. No, bruh, it happened, and everyone knows it. :v Ultimately though, casting the appropriate actors isn't going to save a shit movie.

EDIT: And looking at the comment duckroll posted, that he flipped his own switch to complain about PC culture tells me that he was just engaging in PR culture am I right
 

Ushojax

Should probably not trust the 7-11 security cameras quite so much
In this instance we failed to live up to our own standards of sensitivity and diversity

Seems like it lived up to those standards just fine.
 

Creaking

He touched the black heart of a mod
I'm sure this is frustrating and all, but social media is a bad place to vent like this.

I liked The Crow, but... yikes dude.
 

UrbanRats

Member
Man, he really comes across like an insolent little shit here. What happened to him?! Dark City and I, Robot were so great.

How has one thing anything to do with the other? Also, in the age of Social Media, people give too much credit to meltdowns.
Had Facebook been around since the 60s, i'm sure they would've been a tradition, by now.

I don't care to defend Proyas nor his movie, but anyone can have a mental breakdown, especially after their big project failed so hard and you see the world collective shit on it happily.
People go into meltdowns for less.

Honestly, the truth is the Internet just feeds off this shit, at this point.
 
How has one thing anything to do with the other? Also, in the age of Social Media, people give too much credit to meltdowns.
Had Facebook been around since the 60s, i'm sure they would've been a tradition, by now.

I don't care to defend Proyas nor his movie, but anyone can have a mental breakdown, especially after their big project failed so hard and you see the world collective shit on it happily.
People go into meltdowns for less.

Honestly, the truth is the Internet just feeds off this shit, at this point.

yep. far better directors and talent would have gotten eaten alive if twitter were around in the 50s-90s.

it's very poisonous to creatives tbh, unless they have extremely thick skin and even then it probably can grate. plus they now have an outlet to speak to everybody at any time...nah. that's a recipe for disaster.
 
While I can't comment on Gods of Egypt, as I've not seen it yet, I do think that movie critics can be far too harsh on films these days and a lot of them are stuck up twats anyway.
 

neorej

ERMYGERD!
While I share his sentiment that there's a selection of critics who will never share an original thought on any movie, he has to consider the fact that Gods of Egypt might actually be shit.
 
I like how he glosses over white washing as if it didn't happen. No, bruh, it happened, and everyone knows it. :v Ultimately though, casting the appropriate actors isn't going to save a shit movie.

EDIT: And looking at the comment duckroll posted, that he flipped his own switch to complain about PC culture tells me that he was just engaging in PR culture am I right

I think Proyas just really thought he made a masterpiece that was overshadowed by the casting.

Like, he's just tone deaf to the nth level.
 

Trident

Loaded With Aspartame
I think Proyas just really thought he made a masterpiece that was overshadowed by the casting.

Like, he's just tone deaf to the nth level.

I really wish people would stop using "tone deaf" as some catch-all phrase for something vaguely bad about a person. What are you even trying to say? Why not use actual, specific phrases with meanings related to the point you're trying to make?
 
Proyas embarked on a lengthy rant at critics on Facebook.com, accusing them of not "thinking for themselves" and simply giving his film a bad review because everybody else had.
I don't care about any of his movies, including this one. I'm more interested in people who refer to Facebook as "Facebook.com". I think this is the first time I've ever seen anyone refer to it as such, and it looks so strange to me. It'd be like saying 'I was able to find x on Google.com'. Is this something common, or is it as unnatural as it feels to me?
 

sankt-Antonio

:^)--?-<
But these guys are the leads of a movie about Gods of Egypt
gods-of-egypt.jpg



But then you go to the muesum and the Gods are painted like....
hieroglyphs.jpg

17558f5f0970aa3111b07b06bb1ea91c.jpg

I don't see what's wrong with this. While I get the white wash accusations. This movie is not made for educational puoposes nor is it what is asked of Hollywood.
I don't get how the color of the actors skin is erasing all enjoyment one could have for a action/fantasy movie with a Egyptian skin applied to it.

while I think it's good to have the discussion about Hollywoods whitewashing, I don't think it should be leading to dragging down a movie just because of it.

I'm not going to waste my time on this movie, because the trailer made it out to be a shallow action piece, but not because of historical incorrectness.
 
I really wish people would stop using "tone deaf" as some catch-all phrase for something vaguely bad about a person. What are you even trying to say? Why not use actual, specific phrases with meanings related to the point you're trying to make?

Its not hard to understand

Proyas thinks he legit made a good movie. He is attacking critics not because they rightly criticized his work, but because he thinks theres a cloud of political correctness over the casting made. Ie he is tone deaf to the criticism.

Is that better?
 
I don't see what's wrong with this. While I get the white wash accusations. This movie is not made for educational puoposes nor is it what is asked of Hollywood.
I don't get how the color of the actors skin is erasing all enjoyment one could have for a action/fantasy movie with a Egyptian skin applied to it.

while I think it's good to have the discussion about Hollywoods whitewashing, I don't think it should be leading to dragging down a movie just because of it.

I'm not going to waste my time on this movie, because the trailer made it out to be a shallow action piece, but not because of historical incorrectness.

It's a problem because it means fewer jobs for non-white people.

Question, MLK Jr. played by a white man - problematic?
 

Trident

Loaded With Aspartame
Its not hard to understand

Proyas thinks he legit made a good movie. He is attacking critics not because they rightly criticized his work, but because he thinks theres a cloud of political correctness over the casting made. Ie he is tone deaf to the criticism.

Is that better? While Im here do you want me to spell out anything else for you?

No, that was great. Keep using descriptive sentences like that in the future, and you'll enter into the amazing world of actually being able to communicate ideas and information.

As to your actual point now that you've described it, I'm sure plenty of reviewers did bandwagon onto the hate, because we're cruel social animals, and I think his complaints about reviewers hold some possible weight in general. But in this case, they're glomming onto a real social issue, so he's more a victim of hitting against a meaningful zeitgeist than overwrought political correctness, at least in my opinion. Regardless, the movie looked like straight ass, and all these points were already agreed upon in the first page.
 
No, that was great. Keep using descriptive sentences like that in the future, and you'll enter into the amazing world of actually being able to communicate ideas and information.

As to your actual point now that you've described it, I'm sure plenty of reviewers did bandwagon onto the hate, because we're cruel social animals, and I think his complaints about reviewers hold some possible weight in general. But in this case, they're glomming onto a real social issue, so he's more a victim of hitting against a meaningful zeitgeist than overwrought political correctness, at least in my opinion. Regardless, the movie looked like straight ass, and all these points were already agreed upon in the first page.

It sounds like you're projecting

No need to be condescending~ Just because you didn't get what I meant by saying 'tone death' that was following a previous statement(Thus indicating that they were related) doesn't mean my post was some puzzle of the flesh to be deciphered.
 
I would have defended Proyas if Gods of Egypt was anywhere near as interesting as even I Robot and Knowing. Those weren't great movies but they were surprisingly competent. GoE is just a dull CGI fest. It had some sparks of life and a charmingly cheesy sincerity, but he must know the final result is lackluster. Just take the money and move on, this isn't a social media hill worth dying on.
 

spekkeh

Banned
I love it when authors and critics throw shade at each other. It's a cliche that's older than even Hollywood witewashing.

I read the first three rotten reviews on RT, and only one mentions the whiteness and doesn't really make a point out of it. So not sure what the director is on.
 

Tsukumo

Member
One of the most pleasurable fall from grace I've ever witnessed. Shame on anyone who took part on this absurdity.
 

Dryk

Member
Gerard Butler is like the Jar Jar Binks of this movie. If you replaced him with someone more appropriate the movie would still look like total shit but it's a quick and easy criticism for people to latch onto.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Or just maybe not make a movie about Egyptians at all, which is usually the result.

I think they're probably just shitty movies, and that shittiness has nothing to do with the color of the actors skin.

I wait for a day when someone can make an authenticate looking/feeling Egyptian movie. Good storyline and no whitewash. I believe it can work.
 

gabbo

Member
People need to stop hiring Proyas for big budget action films. He seems to be much better at smaller budget titles like his early work, and I Robot was not a god indicator of his ability to put butts in seats
 
I watched the trailer and I don't see why everyone is saying it looks like complete shit from the trailer. Looks like a typical mindless action movie with explosions and shit.

From the trailer alone, what makes this movie worse than, say, Transformers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom