• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Hollywood Reporter: Why Did Marvel and Dreamworks Whitewash Their Asian Characters?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Was Ninja Assassin the last major studio movie where most of the leads were Asian? I'm blanking on anything else.

Shout out to the Wachowski's for used their pull to get that made.
 

lupinko

Member
In the first film not done by the Asian director, funny about that. (Also I believe Han was in Better Luck Tomorrow?)

What are you talking about? Since Tokyo Drift, the series has only been directed by Asian directors, Justin Lin and starting with 7, James Wan.

And Han bit the bullet in his debut in Tokyo Drift.

Yeah Hollywood doesn't give a shit about Asians but that's one occasion you shouldn't be throwing rocks at them for.
 

Kinyou

Member
I don't think anyone is denying that many Asian's do have narrow eyes. The issue comes in with how Asian's were portrayed in western media for so long, whether that be animation or in actual movies where it was common to feature white people dressed up as Asian's and with over the top stereotypes in terms of appearance. Now DICE's Faith wasn't anywhere near those extremes, but it's still going to make some people raise their eyes whenever you go for those stereotypes when characters of those races are rare. Obviously Asian's aren't rare in games in general because of all the Asian studios around the world, but leads in western games? Pretty fucking rare.

I think if you look at games that have Asian character and are developed by Japanese, Korean, Chinese etc. studios you'll see that their characters fall more in line with what those Japanese posters were talking about than what DICE's Faith originally looked like. They still do feature characters with smaller eyes, but it's not the go to look.
It would be interesting to know if Asian Americans feel similar, or if that's perhaps something only the Japanese audience is more interested in because they're already so strongly represented in their own media anyway.
 
It would be interesting to know if Asian Americans feel similar, or if that's perhaps something only the Japanese audience is more interested in because they're already so strongly represented in their own media anyway.

Well the comments were made by Japanese and the artist was Korean so you have at least a small sampling of two different groups who seem to think the same
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
I can't wait to see how tactfully they bring Fing Fang Foom to life in live action on the big screen. He's asian right?
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
FFF is an alien.

I wasn't really being serious with that post. It was more the fact that his name is silly and he looks like an Asian dragon and fucks around with the Mandarin and we would probably get him before we get a decent asian character in a movie.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
No they are not and it is fucking offensive.

Look, I'm sorry you're offended, but apparently too offended to read the article properly.

1. Even the shittiest old white guy editor in the business KNOWS you don't say "Oriental" when referring to people, unless making a point. As do his copy, sub and deputy editors. It didn't slip through the cracks. It wasn't an article in DieHard Gamefan.
2. It's a strong piece of reporting on a giant cultural problem in Hollywood. Written in scolding terms.
3. The article is written and researched by an Asian-American journalist.

It's a deliberate piece of sarcastic language, in the proper context. It was designed to press that button, on purpose.

4. The offending term separates the offensively generic oriental themes from the people. To draw attention to it.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
I'm not exactly sure what about this project's storyline requires any of the roles to be cast with Asian people.

It's not like they cast Matt Damon as Dr. Tenma.
 

linsivvi

Member
Look, I'm sorry you're offended, but apparently too offended to read the article properly.

1. Even the shittiest old white guy editor in the business KNOWS you don't say "Oriental" when referring to people, unless making a point. As do his copy, sub and deputy editors. It didn't slip through the cracks. It wasn't an article in DieHard Gamefan.
2. It's a strong piece of reporting on a giant cultural problem in Hollywood. Written in scolding terms.
3. The article is written and researched by an Asian-American journalist.

It's a deliberate piece of sarcastic language, in the proper context. It was designed to press that button, on purpose.

Thanks for telling me I shouldn't be offended by the use of an offensive word because it's used by "my own people".

And thanks for making the assumption that I didn't read the article and need you to explain to me why I shouldn't feel offended.
 

4Tran

Member
This is a very dumb trend in general, and I think it's one that hurts male Asian actors even moreso than female ones. The reason seems to stem from Asian men being seen as nerdy, unassuming, safe, and sexually inactive. This rules them out of most leading men roles by default.

Female Asian actors are still deemed viable for roles calling for sexy love interests so they have more opportunities. It leads to the curious phenomenon where it's really rare to see an Asian man kissing a woman in Hollywood films, but Asian women kissing scenes are far more common.

Of all the examples in this thread, I can excuse the Ghost in the Shell casting choice because it runs into one of the other big Hollywood stereotypes: the unwillingness to have a female lead in a tentpole action film. There are probably only three women in Hollywood that executives are willing to risk headlining a major film like this, and Scarlett Johansson is in that select company. If anyone else was the lead the film wouldn't have been made in the first place.
 
Of all the examples in this thread, I can excuse the Ghost in the Shell casting choice because it runs into one of the other big Hollywood stereotypes: the unwillingness to have a female lead in a tentpole action film. There are probably only three women in Hollywood that executives are willing to risk headlining a major film like this, and Scarlett Johansson is in that select company. If anyone else was the lead the film wouldn't have been made in the first place.

A much better solution to the problem...

It's relatively obvious Hollywood is going to butcher it...
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
Thanks for telling me I shouldn't be offended by the use of an offensive word because it's used by "my own people".

And thanks for making the assumption that I didn't read the article and need you to explain to me why I shouldn't feel offended.

YOU said in your post that they DIDN'T intend to be provocative in their language. I'm suggesting you may be OBJECTIVELY incorrect. I'm not telling you whether to be offended or not. I actually don't care whether you're offended or not since you're rude and oblivious. I was defending the use of the word in an excellent article, by a thoughtful writer trying to draw attention to exactly the kind of thing you're offended about.
 

linsivvi

Member
YOU said in your post that they DIDN'T intend to be provocative in their language. I'm suggesting you may be OBJECTIVELY incorrect. I'm not telling you whether to be offended or not. I actually don't care whether you're offended or not since you're rude and oblivious. I was defending the use of the word in an excellent article, by a thoughtful writer trying to draw attention to exactly the kind of thing you're offended about.

No, you were suggesting that I didn't read the article properly.

You weren't interested in an honest discussion when you made such a baseless accusation.

Talk about being rude.

By saying I am "objectively" incorrect you are telling me I'm wrong to feel offended. That's what exactly you are doing no matter how many words you used to dress it up.

Objectively wrong. What a joke.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
No, you were suggesting that I didn't read the article properly.

You weren't interested in an honest discussion when you made such a baseless accusation.

Talk about being rude.

By saying I am "objectively" incorrect you are telling me I'm wrong to feel offended. That's what exactly you are doing no matter how many words you used to dress it up.

Objectively wrong. What a joke.

Maybe you forgot what you typed:

Jm1WHpl.png


And it's fine to be offended, but be clear - you're offended by the use of the word DESPITE it being used in a deliberately provocative (I'd actually say satirical) fashion.

Which is literally fine. A person of color could be offended by the n-word regardless of context. But that's not what you said when this argument kicked off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom