chickdigger802
Banned
GTA V might be...
is it really though? GTAO is ass, and its an open world game... so 70% sure it won't be 60fps.
GTA V might be...
So what if I'm a first time buyer? Is it worth the $60? I ask this as many people are saying they are not buying a second time at $60 as it's not worth it.
So what if I'm a first time buyer? Is it worth the $60? I ask this as many people are saying they are not buying a second time at $60 as it's not worth it.
So what if I'm a first time buyer? Is it worth the $60? I ask this as many people are saying they are not buying a second time at $60 as it's not worth it.
So what if I'm a first time buyer? Is it worth the $60? I ask this as many people are saying they are not buying a second time at $60 as it's not worth it.
Most of the game is a monotonous 3rd person shooter where you shoot the same dumb AI over and over and cinematic action sequences where things blow up around you while you press/hold simple inputs.
There's only so much you can do with last-gen texture resolution.
Watched the video again. Face looks good to me.
Needs more AA though
That wouldn't be fair would it lol.
GTA V might be...
This version uses subsurface scattering for Lara's skin which isn't in the PC version, so yeah, the skin definitely looks better than in the PC version.
Old vs new face I'm still conflicted on, but the new skin definitely looks better. Played the game on Ultra w/Tress FX at 1440p/30fps last year, but the skin shader on the PC is probably inferior to this new version.
So what if I'm a first time buyer? Is it worth the $60? I ask this as many people are saying they are not buying a second time at $60 as it's not worth it.
So what if I'm a first time buyer? Is it worth the $60? I ask this as many people are saying they are not buying a second time at $60 as it's not worth it.
I would say no. It wasn't worth the $4 I rented it for.
It's a very mechanically sound and pretty game that has a very bad story and very little gameplay value. Basically all style, no substance.
Most of the game is a monotonous 3rd person shooter where you shoot the same dumb AI over and over and cinematic action sequences where things blow up around you while you press/hold simple inputs. The traversal and puzzles are barely there and so simple, dumbed-down, and lacking in anything resembling challenge that they might as well not be there.
Wait, you didn't enjoy pressing a total of 3 buttons to? I thought that was much more fun than having a challenging timed platforming section!escape the exploding wreckage of a ship
This isn't a dick measuring contest, I actually want to see this remaster compared to the best looking version of their old build. If they said they actually went back and did more than just hit a few graphical settings on, I want to see what's different.How about someone does a PS4 vs average PC comparison?
They seem to be using this to get a grip on the new console arcitechtures. Not a waste of money at all, if this helps them to ease into PS4Bone development.Seems like a waste of money when they could've just easily ported the PC version...
Squeenix gonna Squeenix I guess.
Dude. I get it. You don't like the game. That doesn't mean you should needlessly repeat yourself again and again how much you hate the game and discourage others from experiencing it.
I'm on mobile with data cap, can anyone summarize the difference? Is it 30 vs 60fps? Is it Uncharted 1 vs 2?
I can't imagine why not. Is it any different from someone recommending the game?
At max settings, 1080p@60fps?!sounds like slightly improved PC version from what I can gather?
One opinion isn't supposed to drown out the other.
Fair enough. It's not easy to stay quiet when you see someone charging $60 for a port of a game from last year that you personally found incredibly boring, though.
Who knows? The folks over at Crystal Dynamics could be taking all of the criticism into account in an attempt to make a sequel that could win over people such as yourself.
1080p, we don't know what the frame rate is but it's most likely going to be 30fps.At max settings, 1080p@60fps?!
But it's not thrilling. The story is utter crap and the gameplay is repetitive, tedious, and unchallenging. How is it thrilling when there is no danger of failing due to lack of skill?Basically the exact opposite of all of this for me.
I thought it was a thrilling, fast-paced action game that draws upon modern mechanics and borrows heavily from standout blockbusters like the Uncharted and Arkham series (in a good way). I am a huge fan of Uncharted 2 & 3, and yet I feel Tomb Raider takes what those games were doing and manages to best them (aside from story and characterization, which is good here but not stellar). It's like making Uncharted more expansive and adding more exploration and motivating you to actually want to collect and find things.
It's a gorgeous game to look at. There's a very nice balance of action and exploration, though the tombs themselves are too short and too few, what is there is very atmospheric and transporting.
I don't get the hate the game gets from a lot of people. It's tied for 2nd with GTAV for my favorite game of 2013.
But yes, the multiplayer is shit.