Again Unity already did that, (tailing missions for instance were massively reduced yet also expanded to be more open just like every mission in the game). I do wonder if they're going for a new identity altogether or whether that would be a good idea. It remains to be seen because all we can do atm is speculate on just how big the changes will be.
As a fan of the franchise I welcome this expected news but I hope they release something this year (HD remaster), Chronicles left a bad taste in my mouth.
No I was saying that there have already been revamps, a typical narrative you commonly see on gaming forums is that "all X games are the same" concerning large franchises and their sequels, in this case AC.I don't know why you are so set to say I'm asking for something that already happened. They have to revamp that game every time they do a big locale jump. I'm excited to see them take things back to Egypt, to the simpler times like AC1. I'm also interested in them drastically changing up now animations work, how the fundamentals of tooling work. Is you're point still stimming out of the argument that the revamps have left things buggy and it was really the sequels that delivered?
Ran this into ground harder than splinter cell. Remember at the start of last gen Asscreed was to be a trilogy.
Watchdogs sadly is next for overkill.
No I was saying that there have already been revamps, a typical narrative you commonly see on gaming forums is that "all X games are the same" concerning large franchises and their sequels, in this case AC.
I would love an Assassin's Creed compilation with all the games for the current generation. This would be the perfect opportunity to make it happen.
Uh, give me a break. Who cares about these useless changes if the game at it's core is the same? Do you know the meaning of overhaul? You can add a shit ton of small things to your game but it won't change a thing if you stubbornly not willing to do a complete overhaul which was needed like 5-6 years ago. The one and only big thing they've added was ship combat and gameplay, that's it, and even this was abandoned after 3 games.Good thing the company made a very detailed retrospective video series detailing the changes made both small and large. I'd advise going through that before unironically stating that they literally made the same game every time. It's like saying Nintendo makes the same Zelda game every time.
It it that bad? Which ones did you play?
Saw this quote pop up in the OP of one of the other active Ubisoft threads on GAF:
This phrasing is slightly different than simply saying that there will be no new Assassin's Creed in 2016. Is the bolded trying to indicate that there may be no new release in 2017 either?
I suppose this may just mean fiscal year 2016-17, which I think ends in March of 2017.
Who cares about these useless changes if the game at it's core is the same? Do you know the meaning of overhaul? You can add a shit ton of small things to your game but it won't change a thing if you stubbornly not willing to do a complete overhaul which was needed like 5-6 years ago. The one and only big thing they've added was ship combat and gameplay, that's it, and even this was abandoned after 3 games.
They did a complete overhaul of POP back in 2008 which was a completely new game with a completely new concept, why can't they do the same with AC?
What things haven't they actually touched upon or changed in some way?I see, but I don't get why that's related to what I'm saying. Even with all the work that they've done it's still be an annual series that has started to wear on people. Not always offering the change or progress forward that people are looking for. If they want this series to be around for another 10 years it helps change things that they have previously not touched through their various iterations.
Because they've overhauled multiple mechanics in the series. They didn't JUST add small changes but also incredibly large ones that completely changed aspects of the game design as well as changing mission design and pacing. Again, read and watch the entire video series because your statements makes no sense under any sort of scrutiny.Who cares about these useless changes if the game at it's core is the same? Do you know the meaning of overhaul? You can add a shit ton of small things to your game but it won't change a thing if you stubbornly not willing to do a complete overhaul which was needed like 5-6 years ago. The one and only big thing they've added was ship combat and gameplay, that's it, and even this was abandoned after 3 games.
They did a complete overhaul of POP back in 2008 which was a completely new game with a completely new concept, why can't they do the same with AC?
What things haven't they actually touched upon or changed in some way?
Because they've overhauled multiple mechanics in the series. They didn't JUST add small changes but also incredibly large ones that completely changed aspects of the game design as well as changing mission design and pacing. Again, read and watch the entire video series because your statements makes no sense under any sort of scrutiny.
This year, we also are stepping back and re-examining the Assassins Creed franchise. As a result, weve decided that there will not be a new Assassins Creed game in 2016
No they didn't (again, I don't care about useless and not completely game changing stuff they've added) and no I will not read and watch a single thing. I've played every game they made before Unity and I know what I am talking about. Hell, I am not the only one who thinks the same way so please, stop trying to change our mind (you won't succeed) and stop defending them cuz they do not deserve this, not a in the slightest.Because they've overhauled multiple mechanics in the series. They didn't JUST add small changes but also incredibly large ones that completely changed aspects of the game design as well as changing mission design and pacing. Again, read and watch the entire video series because your statements makes no sense under any sort of scrutiny.
Is the movie next year then? Wouldn't be surprised if they shit one out for dat synergy.
I'm not sure if they've learned anything. The series needs an extended hiatus. Two years isn't enough.
One extra year of development = 4 years for the next entry development
The games are normally on a ~3 year development. Unity was openly stated to have been under way 3 years before it launched.
4 years is great.