Escape Goat
Member
Maybe they got an advanced screening of the movie
Maybe they got an advanced screening of the movie
Burn the UN to the ground.
Supergirl is not cheesecake.
http://i.imgur.com/PUaTnEi.jpg/IMG][/QUOTE]
[CODE][IMG]http://2static.fjcdn.com/large/pictures/ae/1d/ae1d4b_5823706.jpg[/CODE]
Those are the reasons LOLWhat was the reasoning again? Because reading this article makes it sound like wonder woman couldn't be the ambassador fir equality due to her being white and pretty. That is crazy if true.
Supergirl is not cheesecake.
Giving such title to a fictional character is dumb anyways. Now, a real person like Emma Wattson is better, wasn't she also a UN ambassador or something like that? Hope no one protested just because she is pretty
Those are the reasons LOL
Giving such title to a fictional character is dumb anyways. Now, a real person like Emma Wattson is better, wasn't she also a UN ambassador or something like that? Hope no one protested just because she is pretty
Wonder Woman is one of the best known feminist icon in the world. Sometimes the far left falls for far/alt-right lies that aim is to render feminism as a fringe concept..
On 21 October 2016, the Secretary-General of the United Nations decided that the new Honorary Ambassador for the empowerment of women and girls will be Wonder Woman, a fictional character, the rights to which are owned by DC Comics, a for-profit entertainment corporation.
Since that date, over 16,000 people have expressed their concern with this appointment.
Wonder Woman was created 75 years ago. Although the original creators may have intended Wonder Woman to represent a strong and independent “warrior” woman with a feminist message, the reality is that the character’s current iteration is that of a large breasted, white woman of impossible proportions, scantily clad in a shimmery, thigh-baring body suit with an American flag motif and knee high boots –the epitome of a “pin-up” girl. This is the character that the United Nations has decided to represent a globally important issue – that of gender equality and empowerment of women and girls. It appears that this character will be promoted as the face of sustainable development goal 5 for the United Nations at large.
At a time when issues such as gender parity in senior roles and the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of women and girls is at the top of the United Nation’s agenda, including the “He for She” campaign, this appointment is more than surprising. It is alarming that the United Nations would consider using a character with an overtly sexualized image at a time when the headline news in United States and the world is the objectification of women and girls. The image that Wonder Woman projects (life-size cut outs of which have already appeared at UNHQ) is not culturally encompassing or sensitive –attributes the United Nations expects all its staff members to embody in the core value of respect for diversity.
The message the United Nations is sending to the world with this appointment is extremely disappointing. The bottom line appears to be that the United Nations was unable to find a real life woman that would be able to champion the rights of ALL women on the issue of gender equality and the fight for their empowerment. The United Nations has decided that Wonder Woman is the role model that women and girls all round the world should look up to.
Having strong (living, breathing) female role models is a critical aspect of the goal of empowerment of women and girls. If the United Nations would like a list of incredible extraordinary women that would formidably carry out this role, we could surely be able to come up with a list from which the Secretary-General could choose.
Since 2007, the Secretary-General has launched campaign after campaign under the banner of the empowerment of women and girls. However, the United Nations cannot on the one hand claim that “providing women and girls with equal access to education, healthcare, decent work, and representation in political and economic decision-making processes will fuel sustainable economies and benefit societies and humanity at large,” and on the other, award this key ambassadorial role to Wonder Woman, relegating the importance of the issue of gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls to the previous appointment of fictional characters for ambassadorial positions, such as Tinkerbell (Ambassador of Green) and Winnie the Pooh (Ambassador of Friendship).
..... okay, sure.
Or maybe we shouldn't nominate fictional characters for real world shit.
Good.
Has the world really ran out of real women with great achievements that require acknowledgment that the UN must use a fictional, cartoon character to act as a representative role model for women?
No... but does that exclude fictional characters from the title? It's undeniable WW has had an impact on the feminist movement in America and elsewhere. Should that not be recognized?
I'm not sure what is so unbelievable about people not feeling represented by a flawless white supermodel
I don't understand why people need to identify themselves to other people like this, it's even worse when it comes to fiction, people should be inspiration by their acts, not by their looks...
Having read the petition I don't see where anyone can really disagree with it.
Except Wonder Woman was being held up as a role model, AKA someone that people should not only be able to identify with but also strive to emulate. Also if you don't read Wonder Woman comics she is in fact just a brunette barbie doll in a skimpy red white and blue outfit. There are no "acts" other than in media which the vast majority of the world's populace does not partake.
You are all wrong, it's Gwenpool's time to shine!!!
Frank Cho stopped doing variants. Cliff Chiang is like the exact opposite of Cho.The fact that she has large breasts shouldn't somehow mean she can't be a good role model for girls. She's not a Barbie doll. She's a fierce but very compassionate, well spoken, intelligent and complex character.
Not only that, but Greg Rucka getting controlling with her image is what reportedly caused Cliff Chiang to stop doing variant covers for the series.
Seems very superficial to me and ironically sends the message that how you look is more import than how you act.
So your saying you never had to look towards a fictional character, especially a superhero when life gets you down?..... okay, sure.
Or maybe we shouldn't nominate fictional characters for real world shit.
You'd be surprised how much people are influenced by fictional characters. It's why representation has become an important topic in comics.I feel like the issue is more that she's a fictional character and there's plenty of actual women who would be better for this. Also, the people who were mad about this felt like it was a slap in the face after a man was picked to be the next Secretary General.
I don't get why everyone in the thread is upset, I think it's kind of dumb to use WW instead of a real person.
This is some petty bullshit on the UN's part.
WW is all about S&M anyways...
This was her official costume for the last 3-4 years
Yes, the wording in the petition is quite poor. A lack of diversity in media is a legitimate problem, but blaming a singular character for being white is ridiculous.
Also, I agree that many girls consider her iconic. My daughter, for example, is impressed by Wonder Woman and Supergirl even though both of them have been portrayed as cheesecake at various times.
Supergirl is not cheesecake.
This was her official costume for the last 3-4 years
Small Victory Rejected, Would Rather Have Nothing.
Honestly, people have to learn to appreciate the small victories more. We can't really progress if we criticize every small move forward.
Calling a leotard with a cape cheesecake?
And they get along with the class clownAnd this, again, is why Democrats won't be in power for the next decade. FTR, this is the WW little girls love with right now:
Wait I thought cheesecakes were pies made of cream cheese, when has have Super Girl and Wonder Woman been portrayed as pies and not women? What are you talking about?
Because that post should belong to a real women that have accomplished inspiring and great things, in which this world has aplenty, instead of filled by a fictional character created by some multi-million commercial company.
In my views, it really cheapens the whole thing and feels like a degradation to what the post is representing. It's like saying "no real women are worth this post, so let's use a cartoon fictional woman instead!"
Would've been nice to have an actual person who did something for the cause lol, you kidding me with this? Right move.
Besides, if we HAVE to pick a fictional character that represents "a strong and independent woman with a feminist message", Rosie is a better pick than Wonder Woman. Wonder Woman kinda sucks.
Isn't she American with those clothes? How can she be an international icon?
Isn't she American with those clothes? How can she be an international icon?