Dragonborn
Member
I thought this was true about the 360 vs the PS3, but the PS3 eeked out several months last year.
Several months? Was it is just one month (Sept, thanks to GTA) after years of getting beat.
I thought this was true about the 360 vs the PS3, but the PS3 eeked out several months last year.
As a gamer, would you rather play Singstar or SO, the MCC or Littlebigplanet? I mean, I know people love Sony but come on.
People forget how long it took for PS3 to get traction after their bad initial approach, MS better hold on the effects of a bad approach takes years to wear off.
Several months? Was it is just one month (Sept, thanks to GTA) after years of getting beat.
Wrong wrong wrong, debunked literally hundreds of times. The PS3 was always selling better than the 360 in several regions worldwide last generation, and by the end they were able to shift the ration in regions that they weren't selling as well as 360 (the UK and US) in order to catch up worldwide overall.
This generation Xbone is selling worse everywhere.
Unless the PS4 is literally discontinued there is nothing that MS can do to catch up.
Wrong wrong wrong, debunked literally hundreds of times. The PS3 was always selling better than the 360 in several regions worldwide last generation, and by the end they were able to shift the ration in regions that they weren't selling as well as 360 (the UK and US) in order to catch up worldwide overall.
This generation Xbone is selling worse everywhere.
Unless the PS4 is literally discontinued there is nothing that MS can do to catch up.
There should really be a "In the US" on the thread title.
I almost laughed myself to death until I saw that he was talking about US numbers. Which doesn't seem so impossible.
I wouldn't call which console will sell more overall so early, look at how much legwork the PS3 has done in these few years and last I checked both the 360 and PS3 were at about 70-80 million all time sales. The Xbox one is so far doing legwork as well and all it take is the right mood.
MS has more firmware updates.Again man...how is MS doing more legwork? Sony has a ton of studios woeking on announced and unannounced games (probably more than MS). What is MS doing that Sony is not? You keep saying this on every page.
Bullshit the Playstation 3 Phat was getting absolutely destroyed. Sony had to literally relaunch the brand (right down to software boxart redesign) and make a Slim console before the tide started to shift and even then it took them years. All you people forget the phat years out of mere convenience. The 360 had a strong start and a weak finish, the PS3 had a weak start and a strong finish. Headstarts mean nothing. The Dreamcast and Wii both prove this. Eventually the tides will correct themselves based on past, present and future offerings and if that ever happens to Xbox One then the pattern is predictable as it has been in generation's past.
Eventually the tides will correct themselves based on past, present and future offerings and if that ever happens to Xbox One then the pattern is predictable as it has been in generation's past.
Again man...how is MS doing more legwork? Sony has a ton of studios woeking on announced and unannounced games (probably more than MS). What is MS doing that Sony is not? You keep saying this on every page.
Again man...how is MS doing more legwork? Sony has a ton of studios woeking on announced and unannounced games (probably more than MS). What is MS doing that Sony is not? You keep saying this on every page.
So you're predicting a MS 'win' this gen based on what Sony did last generation?
Reasonable, totally reasonable.
So you're predicting a MS 'win' this gen based on what Sony did last generation?
Reasonable, totally reasonable.
Pachter is just sitting back and laughing his ass off.
Bullshit the Playstation 3 Phat was getting absolutely destroyed. Sony had to literally relaunch the brand (right down to software boxart redesign) and make a Slim console before the tide started to shift and even then it took them years. All you people forget the phat years out of mere convenience. The 360 had a strong start and a weak finish, the PS3 had a weak start and a strong finish. Headstarts mean nothing. The Dreamcast and Wii both prove this. Eventually the tides will correct themselves based on past, present and future offerings and if that ever happens to Xbox One then the pattern is predictable as it has been in generation's past.
Bullshit the Playstation 3 Phat was getting absolutely destroyed. Sony had to literally relaunch the brand (right down to software boxart redesign) and make a Slim console before the tide started to shift and even then it took them years. All you people forget the phat years out of mere convenience. The 360 had a strong start and a weak finish, the PS3 had a weak start and a strong finish. Headstarts mean nothing. The Dreamcast and Wii both prove this. Eventually the tides will correct themselves based on past, present and future offerings and if that ever happens to Xbox One then the pattern is predictable as it has been in generation's past.
Feel better now?
Okay well, feel free to continue this weird Tolkienesque prophesising and ignore the facts, but you're going to end up quite confused when the PS4 continues to sell the Xbone for the entire generation.
That isn't what he said. He said, IF that happens then it will have followed the same pattern. How do you get that he, himself is predicting that from his post?
Bullshit the Playstation 3 Phat was getting absolutely destroyed. Sony had to literally relaunch the brand (right down to software boxart redesign) and make a Slim console before the tide started to shift and even then it took them years. All you people forget the phat years out of mere convenience. The 360 had a strong start and a weak finish, the PS3 had a weak start and a strong finish. Headstarts mean nothing. The Dreamcast and Wii both prove this. Eventually the tides will correct themselves based on past, present and future offerings and if that ever happens to Xbox One then the pattern is predictable as it has been in generation's past.
Youre missing my point, i was probably too obtuse.
I mean MS and sony constantly switching places at the top of sales numbers can only mean great things for everyone involved, including single console owners.
Why would you want either company resting on success?
How can you honestly say that? 360 was top dog for so long then sony turned the ship around, are you saying its IMPOSSIBLE for MS to catch up when weve seen the sales leader switch a few times in every generation?
Wrong wrong wrong, debunked literally hundreds of times. The PS3 was always selling better than the 360 in several regions worldwide last generation, and by the end they were able to shift the ration in regions that they weren't selling as well as 360 (the UK and US) in order to catch up worldwide overall.
This generation Xbone is selling worse everywhere.
Unless the PS4 is literally discontinued there is nothing that MS can do to catch up.
I'm not going to say it's impossible, but I do consider it exceedingly improbable that the Xbone will ever catch up to the PS4.
Please don't put words in my posts.
That isn't what he said. He said, IF that happens then it will have followed the same pattern. How do you get that he, himself is predicting that from his post?
Eventually the tides will correct themselves based on past, present and future offerings[/B].....
... and if that ever happens to Xbox One then the pattern is predictable as it has been in generation's past.
I'm not gonna argue that but lets not pretend like they have no exclusives left this year.
Also both franchises are not as small as people seem to believe. (Singstar Franchise has + 20 million sales and LBP franchise has +9 million sales)
Not everyone loves to play shooters. You dismiss LBP but it will probably sell more than SO maybe even MCC i don't know if its just bias or ignorance that you continue to dismiss games because you don't like them.
+10 internet points.Consumer's caught wind of the first class treatment, finally. When you think Xbox, you think luxury and elegance.
Constant switching, what? Neither of them want that. You think MS wouldnt kill to be winning all of 2014 months and selling software above all others?. Come on.
Of course, I completely agree. It's totally subjective. My preferences are not the same as others. My posts are always just my angle on things. I am not a parent or a casual gamer, or a teen, or limited by a small budget ... so my opinions will differ vastly from many.
I am very careful now to say, 'In my opinion...' or 'Personally I feel that...' , in many of my posts to get this point across.
A lot of people who jump on my back do not respect that different people have different views, especially on subjective things like preferences of games. It's the same as someone having a go because you like different music than they do.
Personally, I feel that the MS games lineup for 2014 is a lot stronger than the PS4. That's a subjective opinion. It's not wrong. It can't be wrong. It's like saying, 'You think Led Zeppelin are the best band ... but you are wrong.'
I will be buying all the great exclusives for my PS4. It is currently an exclusives machine for me and as such, apart from PS+ free games, I only own Killzone, TLOU, Infamous and Resogun. I can't wait for 2015 as I think that is when the PS4 will really start to be worth my investment in it.
Bullshit the Playstation 3 Phat was getting absolutely destroyed. Sony had to literally relaunch the brand (right down to software boxart redesign) and make a Slim console before the tide started to shift and even then it took them years. All you people forget the phat years out of mere convenience. The 360 had a strong start and a weak finish, the PS3 had a weak start and a strong finish. Headstarts mean nothing. The Dreamcast and Wii both prove this. Eventually the tides will correct themselves based on past, present and future offerings and if that ever happens to Xbox One then the pattern is predictable as it has been in generation's past.
How can you honestly say that? 360 was top dog for so long then sony turned the ship around, are you saying its IMPOSSIBLE for MS to catch up when weve seen the sales leader switch a few times in every generation?
Best thing about this whole affair is that it gave a certain portion of Gaf who have a bone to pick with Sony, a veritable second wind so they can come out of the woodwork.
NPD threads have been pretty lonely now that console war's been decided. I'm glad Pachter spiced things up.
Sure it does, but unless there are games that YOU want, you're not going to bother trying to convince anyone else that it's worth buying.
That's why games like Halo are more important. They appeal to the kind of people that want a new £300 console in the first place.
You did?
EDIT: I agree, that it's nigh impossible, just found those two posts so close a little funny.
It should be clear to anyone that has been following gaming news recently that Sony has allowed their success to go to their head and turn into classic Playstation arrogance. While Xbox continues to positively pump out new OS features that makes The One a joy to own, Playstation contents themselves with stability updates and, if we are lucky, a Share Factory update once every four months.
It is also apparent in their approach to releasing games. While Xbox continues to delight gamers, by securing breathtaking exclusives like Sunset Overdrive and Rise of the Tomb Raider or by securing exclusive FIFA experiences, Sony are content to only enter transparent marketing deals for the biggest disappointment of the generation. Playstation arrogance have even gotten to levels where they feel they can stop paying checks to Ubisoft to gimp XBO versions of games to give gamers the impression that PS4 is superior hardware. A gross miscalculation, in my opinion. When AC: Unity releases this fall and looks just as good on The One, gamers will finally realize that the so-called power advantage of the PS4 was a lie all along.
Perhaps most embarrassing of all is how Sony envisioned Driveclub to be a big exclusive that would help drive sales throughout the Holiday season. With gameplay stuck in the 1900s and next to no customization options how did they expect anyone to pick that game up in 2014? And dont get me started on the multiplayer and PS+ version fiasco. Rather than propel PS4 sales, I expect the bad word-of-mouth from the Driveclub fiasco will negatively affect PS4 sales well into 2015. I am willing to commit to the following bet here and now: Driveclub will be a huge disappointment that will not even chart in the NPD to be released this week. If it does, I will eat my hat. You can laugh all you want, but I expect to be the one still laughing on Thursday night, and you can quote me on that.
Youre missing my point, i was probably too obtuse.
I mean MS and sony constantly switching places at the top of sales numbers can only mean great things for everyone involved, including single console owners.
Why would you want either company resting on success?
No, it's not. I don't understand where this is coming from.Why would you want that. Surely sales parity is better for the consumer?
Competitive platforms are good for the consumer. Sales parity is completely irrelevant to the consumer. In fact, if one platform lags behind the other, it is because the consumer has decided that one platform is not actually good for them. That is how it works. The dog wags the tail.
This "competition is good" thing has grown completely into a monster. Competition is the means by which a lessor is weeded out. If a platform is weaker, it should lose. That is competition. This whole "parity is good for the consumer"/"two platforms selling well is good for the consumer" sentiment is bizarre.
What you are espousing is not capitalism or competition but instead crony capitalism in which market competitors are propped up for the sake of having market competitors.
Y2Kev said:I didn't. Perhaps YOU did. None of those competitors were on "even footing" when it came to sales. They still aren't. Unless you think coke at 48b in sales is on even footing with PepsiCo at 16b.UNCMark said:Perhaps you missed the cola wars, the fast food wars, the beer wars.
Sales parity is IRRELEVANT to the consumer. Sales differential is the RESULT of competition.
Competition results in a winner and a loser. It's not best for the consumer to have everyone on even footing "just because that's best for the consumer." You won't find evidence of this in history; you are depicting controlled markets and zombie corporations.
Here's how it should work: two systems took different paths to the market. That is true. The market will validate them both independently. Someone might lose and it's going to suck for some Internet group.
People are confusing the outcome of competition with the benefits of competition, which is where this silliness over sales comes in.
Constant switching, what? Neither of them want that. You think MS wouldnt kill to be winning all of 2014 months and selling software above all others?. Come on.
This thread, like a fine wine, keeps getting better with age.I don't care, I'm just pointing out a rather continuous pattern in Neogaf at the moment. People calling Neogaf a hivemind isn't a new concept and in some cases it can be entirely true. It just shows how important this forum is to some gamers.
CrazedPro I'd love to hear your answer on MS doing more legwork than Sony
And of course, we have someone who thinks competition means both consoles being neck and neck in sales. Guess what? It doesn't mean that. Time to bring Y2kev quotes
Comparatively and anecdotally, I haven't seen a single Sony promotional event in my city. Sorry if you were expecting a well sourced and industry analytical essay. I'm just being honest with my impressions thus far.
As a gamer, would you rather play Singstar or SO, the MCC or Littlebigplanet? I mean, I know people love Sony but come on.