UncleCross
Member
Taking advantage of a price glitch is not the same as committing this type of fraud.
Who's gaff?
Asking for a price match is not fraud. You should probably learn what that word means if you are going to try to use it.
Taking advantage of a price glitch is not the same as committing this type of fraud.
Who's gaff?
Asking for a price match is not fraud. You should probably learn what that word means if you are going to try to use it.
Asking for a price match is not fraud. You should probably learn what that word means if you are going to try to use it.
Whoa that's straight up fraud to make a fake listing on Amazon.
Price matching an error I can understand, if the retailer decides to match. But to rig the system is unethical.
That's entirely debatable. If someone buys a PS4 at a highly discounted price, it's very possible that the remainder saved will be spent on other goods. Whether that is game related (games/accessories/etc) or other goods entirely, the money will flow somewhere.
So by extension, stealing from a megacorp stimulates the economy! Why didn't congress think of this!
There's also the fact that anyone disagreeing with the fact it's a scam is a shameless Walmart corporate whore who can't bear to think of our dear masters as anything less than perfect and how dare we support a business trying to make money by not scamming shit out of them?
They deserved it? Didn't you see how they were dressed, all price matching and such. They were practically asking for it.
Taking advantage of a price glitch is not the same as committing this type of fraud.
Who's gaff?
You can do that?Whoa that's straight up fraud to make a fake listing on Amazon.
Price matching an error I can understand, if the retailer decides to match. But to rig the system is unethical.
How are rape apologists and Walmart related again, you absolutely ridiculous person?
So by extension, stealing from a megacorp stimulates the economy! Why didn't congress think of this!
But to rig the system is unethical.
More money in consumer pockets stimulates the economy. Certainly moreso than in the coffers of a billionaire that use loopholes to avoid paying billions in taxes.
What the blue hell kind of science-fiction economics class did you take? This only makes any sense whatsoever if retailers got their goods for free and made 100% profit on every item they sold, which is preposterous.That's entirely debatable. If someone buys a PS4 at a highly discounted price, it's very possible that the remainder saved will be spent on other goods. Whether that is game related (games/accessories/etc) or other goods entirely, the money will flow somewhere.
This is why we can't have nice things. someone had to come along and ruin it for everyone else.
I can see Walmart's price match policy changing after this.
Thanks a lot.
I don't know if you saw the discussion earlier in the thread...
But another comparison made was to software piracy.
The excuse here that people are using seems to hinge on the person asking for the price match NOT being the same person that put up the fake listing.
Interestingly this is very similar to the argument some people make when defending piracy: That only the cracker/sharer is in the wrong. Obviously that's bs; the person taking advantage of the "free" game copy via torrent or w/e isn't in the clear.
So why is the person taking advantage of the bogus price, and trying to enter into a price-match transaction at walmart in bad faith blameless, according to many here?
No hyperboleAlso, for anyone who thinks I'm "mad" about not getting a PS4, you should see my legendary bitching about Destiny on PS4 in the Destiny thread.
This is a good post right heresince some people don't know the meaning of certain words I'm here to help.
Theft is the taking of another person's property without that person's permission or consent with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it.[
Lol I really meant it. I missed the WalMart thread by minutes, the WiiU thread by minutes, and this ps4 thread. The one that hurts the most is the Yoshitaka Amano The Sky going for $15 on Amazon smh. Saw the thread and didn't get all the details. Still tons of salt.I think I see what you did there.
What the blue hell kind of science-fiction economics class did you take? This only makes any sense whatsoever if retailers got their goods for free and made 100% profit on every item they sold, which is preposterous.
If the customer's first transaction causes a business to eat a $300 loss on an item, using that entire $300 on more purchases would still barely scratch the surface of recouping the initial loss. Price of products =/= profit margin, you lunatic.
I would have taken full advantage of this exploit, had I been aware/not at work.
More money in consumer pockets stimulates the economy. Certainly moreso than in the coffers of a billionaire that use loopholes to avoid paying billions in taxes.
Still doesn't make sense. If the massive deficit you inflicted upon one retailer caused an okay profit at another, the latter retailer may hold you in esteem but you're still responsible for a net loss to the economy at large.That would be true if I was actually talking about spending the money at the same business.
I wasn't.
Hope he can play his $50 PS4 in jail!
since some people don't know the meaning of certain words I'm here to help.
Theft is the taking of another person's property without that person's permission or consent with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it.[
It is outright theft, at least in Illinois. I'd wager it would be in most other states as well.
720 ILCS 5/16A‑3: Offense of Retail Theft.
A person commits the offense of retail theft when he or she knowingly:
(a) Takes possession of, carries away, transfers or causes to be carried away or transferred, any merchandise displayed, held, stored or offered for sale in a retail mercantile establishment with the intention of retaining such merchandise or with the intention of depriving the merchant permanently of the possession, use or benefit of such merchandise without paying the full retail value of such merchandise
I like how all those people included the PS4's serial number on the receipts in their pictures and, in many cases, the last 4 digits of the credit card used, as well as the town and state of the purchase.
Not quite the most intelligent fraudsters on the planet.
Someone should tell the Illinois legislature.
This is fraud.
If you're American, what a surprise. Congratulations. You want to put someone in a violent American jail over something that is ultimately minor.
If you're not American, congratulations. You'd fit in nicely with the lowest common denominator here.
From what I was told from another poster, trying to prosecute these people would be illegal.
From what I was told from another poster, trying to prosecute these people would be illegal.
How are rape apologists and Walmart related again, you absolutely ridiculous person?
Yep. Not too dissimilar to the concept of the broken window fallacy.Still doesn't make sense. If the massive deficit you inflicted upon one retailer caused an okay profit at another, the latter retailer may hold you in esteem but you're still responsible for a net loss to the economy at large.
They're not.
People saying that Walmart deserved to be scammed are similar, because both are making ridiculously false statements.
Its still up.. For both the PS4 and the Wii U
Uh, I don't think rape and PS4 theft are comparable at all. It's a flat ridiculous comparison that borders on offensive.
That law probably wouldn't hold up in a case like this. Since you can make the argument that your receipt showing the price you paid for the goods is proof of purchasing said item for the full retail price agreed upon during the transaction.