OrbitalBeard
Member
People don't seem disappointed with what they've shown so far. ¯\_(ツ_/¯
Yeah, it's looking pretty great, but, at least for me, going from 60 to 30 will be somewhat disappointing.
People don't seem disappointed with what they've shown so far. ¯\_(ツ_/¯
Slight bump but I guess this explains why motion blur was missing as you can customise it -
This if from the stream here - http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1111637
An option? This is the middleground we deserve.Motion blur option
The "heeey, Eddy!" line always makes me laugh. The delivery is just perfect.
Most remakes look about as good as I remember original game, but Uncharted 1 looks insanely good here! I remember it as clunky, constant screen tearing mess and this look like something that I would happily play today!
(this demo setting reminds me of MGSV a bit. looks easily as good, but of course it is not open world. Still good for remake)
It looks like it is.I hope they make Crushing difficulty available from the start. I get them wanting you to unlock it and experience they game balanced for Hard or Normal, but these are almost 10 years old now.
It looks like it is.
Have to beat it to play brutal.
Let's not get carried away, it does not look as good as MGS5, not even close.
It looks nice though, good improvements over the original game obviously, but U2 still looks considerably better.
U2's gameplay is a very good addition though.
I hope they make Crushing difficulty available from the start. I get them wanting you to unlock it and experience they game balanced for Hard or Normal, but these are almost 10 years old now.
Brutal is the new difficulty.Wait, which one was the hardest? That's what I was talking about. I want to do that from the start.
Bluepoint really is top tier when it comes to port jobs. Still disappointed that they're not including multiplayer, but hopefully ND delivers in that department with Uncharted 4.
The jungles that jeep drives through definitely do. Obviously it's trick because it's not open world, but still impressive at 60 fps.
Oh wow lighting looks very flat in the original game. I remember it looking so much better. lol
My brain is deceiving me.
Very slick presentation.
It's just on rails (and I argue that even than I can't agree with you), when it moves into full gameplay (with gunplay and all) it definitely doesn't look as good, not even as good as U2 imo.
I'm looking forward to playing this. However, as Uncharted 3 no longer has 3D support I consider it downgraded.
I'm looking forward to playing this. However, as Uncharted 3 no longer has 3D support I consider it downgraded.
It makes good business sense though. Don't want to cannibalize your own playerbase when UC4 hits next spring. Not enough time in between the releases to justify a full MP suite, servers, and post-release support. The UC4 beta works really well to give MP to the title without taking from UC4's MP.
Have you? Despite being janky in terms of framerate and resolution, UC3 looks astoundingly good in 3D. The sense of depth and scene presence is matched by very few games I've ever seen. I'd pay full price easily just for that game alone to be remastered in 720p/60 (which is the HDMI 1.4 maximum) in 3D. Such a shame that they didn't do it.You actually used 3D?
Agreed!I hope they nailed SALT WATER PARTICLES in UC1 @ 60fps.
Props to whoever gets that reference!
Apart from the barrel explosions which are most like the original, I'd say no. Even they seem to be missing the initial pop of pressure/heat haze.Much better explosions
Eh disagree they look much better here.Apart from the barrel explosions which are most like the original, I'd say no. Even they seem to be missing the initial pop of pressure/heat haze.
Have you? Despite being janky in terms of framerate and resolution, UC3 looks astoundingly good in 3D. The sense of depth and scene presence is matched by very few games I've ever seen. I'd pay full price easily just for that game alone to be remastered in 720p/60 (which is the HDMI 1.4 maximum) in 3D. Such a shame that they didn't do it.