• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

GeForce GTX 1060 announced - July 19, 6GB, $249 MSRP/$299 Founder's

MuchoMalo

Banned
No it's more like your i7 saying it is 3.6 GHZ and clocks up to 4 GHZ in certain situations. The 1.7 GHZ is the equivalent of the 4 GHZ.

Got it. Thank you!

Just to be clear, the card will actually boost even higher than 1.7GHz most of the time unless you're throttling pretty hard. It's a lot different from CPU boost speeds.

The actual speed really doesn't matter much. Just worry about raw performance.
 
Mini-ITX form-factor allows for significantly less cooling performance over a standard ATX format, both for CPU cooling and case-flow.

You're not looking at top drawer performance when you build a Mini-ITX PC, most are looking for a HTPC with some gaming performance over using the iGPU..
Most ITX cases that allow GPUs have vents so the GPU fan(s) pull cool air from outside the case. They allow cooler air to hit the GPU heatsink than most ATX cases. With reference cards this means that air comes from outside the case and immediately pushed out the back.

Anyone who likes to LAN should be building a performance rig in an ITX case. Much easier to transport and has a small footprint. I personally like the Cooler Master Elite 130.

Sure, you won't be able to overclock the CPU as well without liquid, but that's no reason to think ITX builders aren't interested in GPU performance.
 

Darkwater

Member
Pretty much. It is why Nvidia stock is at 50 dollars a share right now and AMD stock is sitting around 5.

Of course AMD is fighting two fronts, Intel on CPU and Nvidia on GPU. However they are losing both battles pretty heavily. Their Xen CPU is needed for a big comeback. So are their upcoming video cards. It is why the issues they are having with the 480 are disappointing.

Then I'm on team red, whether they win the value battle or not. Unless they lose by a landslide, of course, but that doesn't seem to be happening with this gpu generation.

What issues with the 480 are you talking about? The power draw? From what I read, that was almost a non-issue and definitely is a non-issue since the recent driver update. Any other issues?
 
Do other manufacturers blower-coolers perform any different from first-party ones (founders edition for instance)?

I'm interested in upgrading my Alienware x51 r3, and understand that I'm recommended to use a blower-type cooler.
 

Yeah thought as much. That would line up perfectly. I don't know why some are expecting the 1080 Ti this year. It appears Titan P will be later this year, 1080 Ti in Feb-May. Makes sense for Nvidia to space their releases out, and to combat AMD's Vega in Jan-May.
 
Do other manufacturers blower-coolers perform any different from first-party ones (founders edition for instance)?

I'm interested in upgrading my Alienware x51 r3, and understand that I'm recommended to use a blower-type cooler.

I don't know if they perform better (a blower cooler's a blower cooler), but I can tell you for a fact that they will be cheaper. Founder's Edition cards are overpriced as hell.
 

StereoVsn

Member
Yeah thought as much. That would line up perfectly. I don't know why some are expecting the 1080 Ti this year. It appears Titan P will be later this year, 1080 Ti in Feb-May. Makes sense for Nvidia to space their releases out, and to combat AMD's Vega in Jan-May.
Running 980TI right now and pretty damn happy with it. Next year will be perfect to upgrade with Gen 2 VR headsets hopefully coming in and DirectX playing a bigger role.

Advised couple guys at work to look at 1060 as they didn't want to spend $400+ for 1070 and 1060 will be great for them considering one is running 660ti and the other I think 670.
 

Oxn

Member
Running 980TI right now and pretty damn happy with it. Next year will be perfect to upgrade with Gen 2 VR headsets hopefully coming in and DirectX playing a bigger role.

Advised couple guys at work to look at 1060 as they didn't want to spend $400+ for 1070 and 1060 will be great for them considering one is running 660ti and the other I think 670.

1060 sounds like a great value if you can get at msrp.
 
Do other manufacturers blower-coolers perform any different from first-party ones (founders edition for instance)?

I'm interested in upgrading my Alienware x51 r3, and understand that I'm recommended to use a blower-type cooler.

You sure that's what you need? If your case has air intake and out, you really shouldn't go blower type. Man I will never go blower again because they are loud and hotter. All blowers are the same, small high rpm fan.
 
You sure that's what you need? If your case has air intake and out, you really shouldn't go blower type. Man I will never go blower again because they are loud and hotter. All blowers are the same, small high rpm fan.

To be fair, I'm not entirely sure. I'm basically new to the desktop business, as the only one I've had before was an Acer I eventually swapped the graphics card in with one I got from a friend...

I'm mainly seeing posts from r1 and r2 owners claiming a blower is needed due to the small form factor and to protect the CPU heatsink. But my model has liquid cooling for the CPU.

I'll ask in the X51 thread if anyone else has experience with an r3 model.

I don't know if they perform better (a blower cooler's a blower cooler), but I can tell you for a fact that they will be cheaper. Founder's Edition cards are overpriced as hell.

That would be a benefit. ;-)
 

MuchoMalo

Banned
3GB versions confirmed :|

Edit: Okay, already posted. Also,

It's Mini-ITX, no-one who's running a Mini-ITX rig is that concerned with performance & 3GB is fine for lower-specced 1080p play.

Robin-Williams-What-Year-Is-It-Jumanji.gif
 

PnCIa

Member
It's the only card of its kind that we've seen thus far, and Nvidia has stated the $249 MSRP is for the 6GB version. If this means the 1060 can be had for like $200 with 3GB of VRAM for people who play at 1080p and don't care about maxing out their texture quality, that is fine by me.
Its probably not gonna cost 200 in the wild though. Also, 3gb vram is not a lot these days :/
 
I'd never in a million year buy a 3GB gtx 980 level gpu.

Look at the 2GB gtx 960 and how horribly crippled it is compared to the 4GB version.

That's the future for the 3GB 1060
 

Oxn

Member
I'd never in a million year buy a 3GB gtx 980 level gpu.

Look at the 2GB gtx 960 and how horribly crippled it is compared to the 4GB version.

That's the future for the 3GB 1060

Yep.

I truly think that the 6GB version can last a good 3 years, if your not the type thats chasing the best.

Unlike the 960 before it, this one releases with a bright future, and worth the MSRP.
 

shark sandwich

tenuously links anime, pedophile and incels
Yeah thought as much. That would line up perfectly. I don't know why some are expecting the 1080 Ti this year. It appears Titan P will be later this year, 1080 Ti in Feb-May. Makes sense for Nvidia to space their releases out, and to combat AMD's Vega in Jan-May.
My money is on a Pascal refresh branded as 1100 series. Maybe make the 1180 based on a cut down GP102. Think 600->700 series.
 

Oxn

Member
Man ive been planning for either a 1080 or 1080Ti for soooo long, but the more i look at this card the more i think itll fit my needs better.

I currently have a GTX 780, and the upgrade seems very good for the cost.

-3 more GBs of ram
-GTX980 performance, which equals to 30-50% better performance pending game
-Much lower TDP. 120 vs a whooping 250 on the GTX780
-AIO card vs the reference 780 Im using now.
-Only cost me around $150 or less after i sell this card
-Im using a ITX case, and even though itll fit a 1080, itll work better with a smaller card.

This can be a great stopgap card until a 1180 comes out.
 

byropoint

Member
Man ive been planning for either a 1080 or 1080Ti for soooo long, but the more i look at this card the more i think itll fit my needs better.

I currently have a GTX 780, and the upgrade seems very good for the cost.

-3 more GBs of ram
-GTX980 performance, which equals to 30-50% better performance pending game
-Much lower TDP. 120 vs a whooping 250 on the GTX780
-AIO card vs the reference 780 Im using now.
-Only cost me around $150 or less after i sell this card
-Im using a ITX case, and even though itll fit a 1080, itll work better with a smaller card.

This can be a great stopgap card until a 1180 comes out.

I'm doing the same thing, I'm just replacing a 390 that wasn't the best choice for a limited airflow system...

If it really delivers 980 performance at 120tdp I'll be very happy, perfect card for my quiet mini ITX PC.
 

Nohar

Member
I am not familiar enough with GPU, but basically it is a better and cheaper GTX 980? I have a Sapphire Radeon HD 7850 - 2 Go (yup, that's kinda old now), and I'm looking for a new GPU (along with a new motherboard and CPU). I'll probably make my purchases in August.
 
I am not familiar enough with GPU, but basically it is a better and cheaper GTX 980? I have a Sapphire Radeon HD 7850 - 2 Go (yup, that's kinda old now), and I'm looking for a new GPU (along with a new motherboard and CPU). I'll probably make my purchases in August.

Yeah, kind of.
 
Man ive been planning for either a 1080 or 1080Ti for soooo long, but the more i look at this card the more i think itll fit my needs better.

I currently have a GTX 780, and the upgrade seems very good for the cost.

-3 more GBs of ram
-GTX980 performance, which equals to 30-50% better performance pending game
-Much lower TDP. 120 vs a whooping 250 on the GTX780
-AIO card vs the reference 780 Im using now.
-Only cost me around $150 or less after i sell this card
-Im using a ITX case, and even though itll fit a 1080, itll work better with a smaller card.

This can be a great stopgap card until a 1180 comes out.

Honestly it's a fantastic stop over card, for now and because of the relatively low price point it won't lose significant value if or when you decide to upgrade in the next few years.

That being said I would recommend going for the 6GB version, it will keep its value much better, the 3GB is already below the memory threshold for many modern games. So it's better to go with a 970 or 480 if you insist on going with the lower cost card.
 
Or any of the millions who will be playing at 1080p anyway. 4GB+ is only really beneficial if you're going 1440p or higher, or plan on slamming as much AA on every game as possible.

Try playing Hitman at 1080p on a 2GB 960: you're locked to low textures unless you override the memory safeguards, at which point your FPS tanks.
 

Oxn

Member
Honestly it's a fantastic stop over card, for now and because of the relatively low price point it won't lose significant value if or when you decide to upgrade in the next few years.

That being said I would recommend going for the 6GB version, it will keep its value much better, the 3GB is already below the memory threshold for many modern games. So it's better to go with a 970 or 480 if you insist on going with the lower cost card.

Oh ofcourse ill go with the 6GB model. im saying i'll get 3 more GBs or ram because the 780 already has 3.
 
Hmmm it appears the 1060 is better than a 480 in some areas, but also worse in others.

And definitely not better than a 980

http://videocardz.com/62086/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-rumors-part-5-full-specs-2-0-ghz-overclocking

This won't stop some looking at that and going 'woo it hits 2Ghz overclock!!' and fail to assess what game-performance gains that gives you. If it's like the 1070, you can expect up to 14% more performance.

If the 480 overclocks 'only' to 1400-1450 and you get more performance than +14% in games, it will obviously be the better overclocker in real terms.
 
I would like to get one of these or a 480. Looking forward to having the option to buy one in a few months. I have been using the same PC for 4.5 years now lol. Blizzard games are about all I play on my PC and they scale so well that I don't even worry about it. It's time to upgrade though.
 
D

Deleted member 98878

Unconfirmed Member
When can we expect some proper benchmarks?
 

Ashhong

Member
Everyone only talks about gaming at 1080, but what about 1200? Would the 3gb version still be ok? I was originally debating between the 4 and 8gb 480s, but maybe the 3/6gb 1060 is better? I have dual monitors but only game on one of them if that matters
 
Everyone only talks about gaming at 1080, but what about 1200? Would the 3gb version still be ok? I was originally debating between the 4 and 8gb 480s, but maybe the 3/6gb 1060 is better? I have dual monitors but only game on one of them if that matters

That's a very minor difference in resolution, so don't worry.


About 1060 trading blows with 980, just as expected. You can't surpass a GPU with better numbers with just speed. Even when it could be able to show similar average framerates, expect worse minimums and frame pacing here and there.

Pretty glad it is a full uncut chip too.
 

Engell

Member
Based on this, it actually seems the RX480 comes out on top in more situations.

These benchmarks are properly wrong, if you look at how a gtx970 benchmarks in this game it is very close to the rx480 so if these benchmarks are true the gtx1060 would be slower than a 970.
but who knows..
 
"Lol ok?" It's pretty obvious why they did it.

I just don't see how it's dirty. It's not like the 970 memory fiasco where they lied to people, they're making it clear before release that these things don't support SLI. That's not dirty in my opinion. It's not like SLI is a good idea in 2016 either.
 
And millions of people playing CS:GO, dota and LOL won't care one bit.

lol those people don't need a 250 dollar gpu

they can buy a 20 dollar second hand hd7850 and it is MORE than enough (like more than plenty and then some) to play those games. at 100+ fps

Why not buy a gtx 1080 for terraria while you're at it

Or any of the millions who will be playing at 1080p anyway. 4GB+ is only really beneficial if you're going 1440p or higher, or plan on slamming as much AA on every game as possible.
3GB already isn't enough at 1080p for several games today.

Honestly if you want to buy a 3GB card that badly go right ahead, just don't say you weren't warned hahaha
 

emag

Member
Everyone only talks about gaming at 1080, but what about 1200? Would the 3gb version still be ok? I was originally debating between the 4 and 8gb 480s, but maybe the 3/6gb 1060 is better? I have dual monitors but only game on one of them if that matters


Friends don't let friends get the 3 GB version. There are a number of existing games that bump up against the 2 GB wall at 1080p with low-medium/medium settings. If you're buying a new card, get one with a safe amount of RAM.
 
No Sli support, Nvidia getting more and more dirty with each release..

I actually believe they are being honest here. Why would anyone throw 500$ on 2x1060 when you can buy a 1070 for less than 450$ with less hassles and 2 more GB of RAM?

They also are discouraging enthusiast people to do tri or quad SLIs with big cards because how bad the scaling is.

This is how 480 scales with crossfire with a bunch of games right now:

arkhamknight_1920_1080.png

fallout4_1920_1080.png

jc3_1920_1080.png

r6siege_1920_1080.png

hitman_1920_1080.png


It only looks useful for big resolutions, and you wouldn't buy 1060 for that anyway.
 

Durante

Member
Why not buy a gtx 1080 for terraria while you're at it
This is amusing to me since the game I played most of (in terms of hours) on my new 1080 so far is probably Pix The Cat. It ran at less than 200 MHz, and when I saw that I thought "I could have done this for cheaper" :p

(Don't worry, I fully use it (and would appreciate some more!) in VR)
 
Top Bottom